+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: CUSAbbs (/forum-514.html)
+---- Forum: CUSA Conference Talk (/forum-439.html)
+---- Thread: P6 (/thread-837945.html)
P6 - CrushMI - 12-21-2017 10:56 AM
From @Brett_McMurphy
Group of 5 bowl records vs. Group of 5 teams last 4 years entering tonight:
C-USA 14-6 (.700)
MWC 9-5 (.643)
Sun Belt 9-7 (.563)
MAC 5-11 (.313)
AAC 1-9 (.100)
https://twitter.com/brett_mcmurphy/status/943869420627259393
RE: P6 - herdfan129 - 12-21-2017 11:01 AM
You know, it would be nice if we had a commissioner with some balls and speak out on our behalf like Aresco does for the AAC.
RE: P6 - topper1296 - 12-21-2017 11:02 AM
(12-21-2017 10:56 AM)CrushMI Wrote: From @Brett_McMurphy
Group of 5 bowl records vs. Group of 5 teams last 4 years entering tonight:
C-USA 14-6 (.700)
MWC 9-5 (.643)
Sun Belt 9-7 (.563)
MAC 5-11 (.313)
AAC 1-9 (.100)
https://twitter.com/brett_mcmurphy/status/943869420627259393
How embarrassing for a conference that claims to be a power conference.
RE: P6 - TitanTopper - 12-21-2017 11:03 AM
Yeah...no balls there. Well, on second thought.
RE: P6 - MTPiKapp - 12-21-2017 11:13 AM
Who cares what they call themselves.
They are G5, we know, they know it, let them have their sticker party and stop posting threads that are just going to bring their trolls over here.
RE: P6 - Monarchist13 - 12-21-2017 11:17 AM
(12-21-2017 11:13 AM)MTPiKapp Wrote: Who cares what they call themselves.
They are G5, we know, they know it, let them have their sticker party and stop posting threads that are just going to bring their trolls over here.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media3.giphy.com/media/3oeSAD00YsGzUPTmqA/giphy.gif)
RE: P6 - goliath74 - 12-21-2017 12:18 PM
P7
RE: P6 - ODU2017 - 12-21-2017 12:41 PM
CUSA is P5. Big XII is G5. KU and Baylor would not be allowed in.
Sent from my SM-G930F using CSNbbs mobile app
RE: P6 - EagleX - 12-21-2017 03:08 PM
(12-21-2017 11:13 AM)MTPiKapp Wrote: Who cares what they call themselves.
They are G5, we know, they know it, let them have their sticker party and stop posting threads that are just going to bring their trolls over here.
too late. their trolls are some of this forum's most prolific posters.
RE: P6 - Duke Dawg - 12-21-2017 03:20 PM
don't most of the top AAC teams get bowl games against P5 schools and the middle to lower AAC teams get bowl games against the top teams in the other leagues?
I'm going to guess that has something to do with the poor 1-9 record.
not that i'm advocating the AAC as a P6. They aren't. But that stat is very misleading IMO.
RE: P6 - UTSAMarineVet09 - 12-21-2017 03:28 PM
I think stands for..
P6
I
C
K
RE: P6 - tigtoodawg - 12-21-2017 03:35 PM
(12-21-2017 03:20 PM)Duke Dawg Wrote: don't most of the top AAC teams get bowl games against P5 schools and the middle to lower AAC teams get bowl games against the top teams in the other leagues?
I'm going to guess that has something to do with the poor 1-9 record.
not that i'm advocating the AAC as a P6. They aren't. But that stat is very misleading IMO.
But the tweet was G5 versus G5 (no P5's were included)
RE: P6 - MTPiKapp - 12-21-2017 04:05 PM
(12-21-2017 03:35 PM)tigtoodawg Wrote:(12-21-2017 03:20 PM)Duke Dawg Wrote: don't most of the top AAC teams get bowl games against P5 schools and the middle to lower AAC teams get bowl games against the top teams in the other leagues?
I'm going to guess that has something to do with the poor 1-9 record.
not that i'm advocating the AAC as a P6. They aren't. But that stat is very misleading IMO.
But the tweet was G5 versus G5 (no P5's were included)
The point he was making was that the better AAC programs matchup with P5 programs, leaving their lesser bowl participants to get beaten by other G5s in what AAC fans chalk up to being "their Super Bowl" for the G5 team whenever they get thumped, which ironically is exactly how P5 fans view their matchups witb AAC.
If UCF beats Auburn, SEC fans will chalk it up to the same thing.
1-9 is 1-9. They've had ten bowl games against their G5 brethren and lost nine of them.
RE: P6 - mturn017 - 12-21-2017 04:18 PM
(12-21-2017 03:28 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote: I think stands for..
P6
I
C
K
Bravo, well done.
RE: P6 - EagleX - 12-21-2017 04:56 PM
look, you've got to see this from the perspective of St. Mike of TelevisionLand. he signed on to be the commish of the big east, which was (arguably) a power conference. but then the entire conference committed suicide (literally) rather than tolerate what he was doing to it. BANG, there he was stuck being the commish of the-artist-formerly-known-as-C-USA*. his disappointment must have been epic, his anguish uncontrollable.
so, he's been on this Holy Snipe Hunt ever since, trying to recapture the glory that (he imagined) belonged to the big east in the first place. of course, the P5 was going to cut his balls off even if the big east didn't kill itself, but he either can not or will not accept that obvious fact. and when he couldn't make the big kids accept his cobbled together group of good-to-mediocre G5 schools, he took a huge hit of acid, and created this P6 delusion. what's a bit surprising is that quite a few former conference brethren, all of whom seemed quite sane when I first met them, seem to buy into this hallucinogen-induced bull****. they used to just play football. now they count ratings points. it's all very sad.
so, try to understand the source from whence this demented man's mirage originates; raging butthurt, destroyed dreams, a traumatized psyche, and a few thousand willing disciples.
we should all just pray to God almighty that St. Mike of TelevisionLand doesn't offer koolaid at the next conference gathering, or they're going to carry every one of those bastards out tits-up.
*not that I see (or saw) a problem with that, but it obviously wasn't what he had in mind.
RE: P6 - Seminowl - 12-21-2017 05:13 PM
(12-21-2017 10:56 AM)CrushMI Wrote: From @Brett_McMurphy
Group of 5 bowl records vs. Group of 5 teams last 4 years entering tonight:
C-USA 14-6 (.700)
MWC 9-5 (.643)
Sun Belt 9-7 (.563)
MAC 5-11 (.313)
AAC 1-9 (.100)
https://twitter.com/brett_mcmurphy/status/943869420627259393
I say we get P6 stickers on our helmet. Everyone except the AAC has a legit claim to P6.
RE: P6 - jasdf - 12-21-2017 05:14 PM
(12-21-2017 10:56 AM)CrushMI Wrote: From @Brett_McMurphy
Group of 5 bowl records vs. Group of 5 teams last 4 years entering tonight:
C-USA 14-6 (.700)
MWC 9-5 (.643)
Sun Belt 9-7 (.563)
MAC 5-11 (.313)
AAC 1-9 (.100)
https://twitter.com/brett_mcmurphy/status/943869420627259393
L6L
RE: P6 - Seminowl - 12-21-2017 05:17 PM
(12-21-2017 04:05 PM)MTPiKapp Wrote:(12-21-2017 03:35 PM)tigtoodawg Wrote:(12-21-2017 03:20 PM)Duke Dawg Wrote: don't most of the top AAC teams get bowl games against P5 schools and the middle to lower AAC teams get bowl games against the top teams in the other leagues?
I'm going to guess that has something to do with the poor 1-9 record.
not that i'm advocating the AAC as a P6. They aren't. But that stat is very misleading IMO.
But the tweet was G5 versus G5 (no P5's were included)
The point he was making was that the better AAC programs matchup with P5 programs, leaving their lesser bowl participants to get beaten by other G5s in what AAC fans chalk up to being "their Super Bowl" for the G5 team whenever they get thumped, which ironically is exactly how P5 fans view their matchups witb AAC.
If UCF beats Auburn, SEC fans will chalk it up to the same thing.
1-9 is 1-9. They've had ten bowl games against their G5 brethren and lost nine of them.
But that’s only if the AAC actually admits to thier being a P5. According to them there is no such thing. Thier either or self proclaimed power conference who can beat the G4, or a G5 team who can’t beat them either.
RE: P6 - Attackcoog - 12-21-2017 05:23 PM
lol....no doubt, 1-9 is pretty pizz poor. That said, the conference is 3-3 vs the P5 in that same time frame. So, the AAC post season results are not quite as craptastic as the 1-9 stat might lead one to think.
RE: P6 - Volkmar - 12-21-2017 05:24 PM
(12-21-2017 04:05 PM)MTPiKapp Wrote:(12-21-2017 03:35 PM)tigtoodawg Wrote:(12-21-2017 03:20 PM)Duke Dawg Wrote: don't most of the top AAC teams get bowl games against P5 schools and the middle to lower AAC teams get bowl games against the top teams in the other leagues?
I'm going to guess that has something to do with the poor 1-9 record.
not that i'm advocating the AAC as a P6. They aren't. But that stat is very misleading IMO.
But the tweet was G5 versus G5 (no P5's were included)
The point he was making was that the better AAC programs matchup with P5 programs, leaving their lesser bowl participants to get beaten by other G5s in what AAC fans chalk up to being "their Super Bowl" for the G5 team whenever they get thumped, which ironically is exactly how P5 fans view their matchups witb AAC.
If UCF beats Auburn, SEC fans will chalk it up to the same thing.
1-9 is 1-9. They've had ten bowl games against their G5 brethren and lost nine of them.
That's true, and while it is a valid point that their lower teams are usually playing other G5 conferences' upper teams for the reason cited, it's also worth noting that I doubt we would find any P5 conference with a .100 winning percentage in bowl games against G5 opposition even though it's their worst against our best also. So their "P6" thing still doesn't hold water, at least in terms of their record against other G5 in bowls.