(01-16-2018 10:50 PM)pesik Wrote:  6 committee members are being replaced this year .. one of them will be Oklahoma's AD..the other 5 to be announced in February

you think the AAC will get a rep? we havent had a real rep yet
ucf making a scene about misrepresentation could force their hand

people like to act like the playoff committee will have the same mentality on how they vote always (they have never voted a g5 top 10, they will never do it. etc)

but the committee is small, 13 members, and has high turnover on certain years, like this year with 6. the committee members arent trained and just come in with their own pre-conceived ..if we get a cycle with g5 friendly members who are vocal..who knows

(01-16-2018 11:59 PM)thespiritof1976 Wrote:  

(01-16-2018 10:50 PM)pesik Wrote:  6 committee members are being replaced this year .. one of them will be Oklahoma's AD..the other 5 to be announced in February

you think the AAC will get a rep? we havent had a real rep yet
ucf making a scene about misrepresentation could force their hand

people like to act like the playoff committee will have the same mentality on how they vote always (they have never voted a g5 top 10, they will never do it. etc)

but the committee is small, 13 members, and has high turnover on certain years, like this year with 6. the committee members arent trained and just come in with their own pre-conceived ..if we get a cycle with g5 friendly members who are vocal..who knows

What I would give for Danny White to be on that committee.

(01-16-2018 10:50 PM)pesik Wrote:  6 committee members are being replaced this year .. one of them will be Oklahoma's AD..the other 5 to be announced in February

you think the AAC will get a rep? we havent had a real rep yet
ucf making a scene about misrepresentation could force their hand

people like to act like the playoff committee will have the same mentality on how they vote always (they have never voted a g5 top 10, they will never do it. etc)

but the committee is small, 13 members, and has high turnover on certain years, like this year with 6. the committee members arent trained and just come in with their own pre-conceived ..if we get a cycle with g5 friendly members who are vocal..who knows

(01-16-2018 10:50 PM)pesik Wrote:  6 committee members are being replaced this year .. one of them will be Oklahoma's AD..the other 5 to be announced in February

you think the AAC will get a rep? we havent had a real rep yet
ucf making a scene about misrepresentation could force their hand

people like to act like the playoff committee will have the same mentality on how they vote always (they have never voted a g5 top 10, they will never do it. etc)

but the committee is small, 13 members, and has high turnover on certain years, like this year with 6. the committee members arent trained and just come in with their own pre-conceived ..if we get a cycle with g5 friendly members who are vocal..who knows

(01-17-2018 08:02 AM)fanhood Wrote:  

(01-16-2018 10:50 PM)pesik Wrote:  6 committee members are being replaced this year .. one of them will be Oklahoma's AD..the other 5 to be announced in February

you think the AAC will get a rep? we havent had a real rep yet
ucf making a scene about misrepresentation could force their hand

people like to act like the playoff committee will have the same mentality on how they vote always (they have never voted a g5 top 10, they will never do it. etc)

but the committee is small, 13 members, and has high turnover on certain years, like this year with 6. the committee members arent trained and just come in with their own pre-conceived ..if we get a cycle with g5 friendly members who are vocal..who knows

If the G5 gets a rep, it will be a wallflower AD type that desires to "move up" in the profession. You can take that to bank. It is how it works on the basketball committee.

(01-17-2018 09:46 AM)SublimeKnight Wrote:  Former UCF AD, maybe the best we can do

(01-17-2018 12:22 PM)BullsFanInTX Wrote:  This CFP committee is biased and inherently unfair. I just don't get how people can't see that. What am I missing? And, Aresco is for this committee as constituted?

(01-17-2018 12:26 PM)otown Wrote:  

(01-17-2018 12:22 PM)BullsFanInTX Wrote:  This CFP committee is biased and inherently unfair. I just don't get how people can't see that. What am I missing? And, Aresco is for this committee as constituted?

Who does the selection for candidates? Who were the candidates? How were they selected? Who was nominated? How did the selection progress go? Did the conferences plus ND vote on them? Were the votes party line 6-5?

So many questions, so little answers.................all in the dark.

(01-17-2018 12:29 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(01-17-2018 12:26 PM)otown Wrote:  

(01-17-2018 12:22 PM)BullsFanInTX Wrote:  This CFP committee is biased and inherently unfair. I just don't get how people can't see that. What am I missing? And, Aresco is for this committee as constituted?

Who does the selection for candidates? Who were the candidates? How were they selected? Who was nominated? How did the selection progress go? Did the conferences plus ND vote on them? Were the votes party line 6-5?

So many questions, so little answers.................all in the dark.

All you need to know is each conference gets a vote. Thats 5-5...then Notre Dame gets a vote.

So the voting becomes P5-6 G5-5. The 13 member committee is virtually all P5 reps with a G5 lap dog or two for window dressing. Its a joke. Thats why I was completely against the Selection Committee concept from the start. Its much easier to rig than 2 polls comprised of thousands of voters working in conjunction with multiple computer models. Cant easily control an outcome with that many inputs. Here, they get 13 guys in a smokey room. Better yet---they get to pick the 13 guys. Now, it they can just buy off the refs in a few key games we can have Alabama vs LSU for the Natty every year.

(01-17-2018 12:32 PM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  Why the funk is Ken Hatfield involved? Dude is still mad no one runs the wishbone