+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: AACbbs (/forum-460.html)
+---- Forum: AAC Conference Talk (/forum-409.html)
+---- Thread: AAC RPI after 2/3 games (/thread-841848.html)
AAC RPI after 2/3 games - rath v2.0 - 02-03-2018 05:04 PM
After today's games.
Overall AAC Conference RPI: 7th (ick our OOC RPI and SOS is 22nd for both)
UC: 13
Wichita: 31
Houston: 39
Temple: 40
SMU: 65
UCF: 76
UCONN: 94
Tulsa: 109
Tulane: 122
Memphis: 123
ECU: 273
USF: 281
RE: AAC RPI after 2/3 games - AirRaid - 02-03-2018 05:06 PM
ECU and USF....anchoring the RPI hard. UH plays 4 games against them.
RE: AAC RPI after 2/3 games - rath v2.0 - 02-03-2018 05:22 PM
Thankfully the AAC only gave us that dynamic duo 2 times.
RE: AAC RPI after 2/3 games - payday - 02-03-2018 05:24 PM
Helped make up for those 4 OOC stinkers
RE: AAC RPI after 2/3 games - 2bumsabroad - 02-03-2018 05:26 PM
(02-03-2018 05:04 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote: After today's games.
Overall AAC Conference RPI: 7th (ick our OOC RPI and SOS is 22nd for both)
UC: 13
Wichita: 31
Houston: 39
Temple: 40
SMU: 65
UCF: 76
UCONN: 94
Tulsa: 109
Tulane: 122
Memphis: 123
ECU: 273
USF: 281
The goal for the conference at this point is to sneak a 4th team in. If we do, we probably put more teams in than the PAC12 and possibly tie the big ten
RE: AAC RPI after 2/3 games - Joprior23 - 02-03-2018 05:42 PM
(02-03-2018 05:26 PM)2bumsabroad Wrote:(02-03-2018 05:04 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote: After today's games.
Overall AAC Conference RPI: 7th (ick our OOC RPI and SOS is 22nd for both)
UC: 13
Wichita: 31
Houston: 39
Temple: 40
SMU: 65
UCF: 76
UCONN: 94
Tulsa: 109
Tulane: 122
Memphis: 123
ECU: 273
USF: 281
The goal for the conference at this point is to sneak a 4th team in. If we do, we probably put more teams in than the PAC12 and possibly tie the big ten
Who is the fourth team going to be? Temple or SMU?
RE: AAC RPI after 2/3 games - rath v2.0 - 02-03-2018 05:53 PM
Temple could be the topic of a lot of debate in late February.
RE: AAC RPI after 2/3 games - BrooklynRocket - 02-03-2018 07:14 PM
(02-03-2018 05:42 PM)Joprior23 Wrote:(02-03-2018 05:26 PM)2bumsabroad Wrote:(02-03-2018 05:04 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote: After today's games.
Overall AAC Conference RPI: 7th (ick our OOC RPI and SOS is 22nd for both)
UC: 13
Wichita: 31
Houston: 39
Temple: 40
SMU: 65
UCF: 76
UCONN: 94
Tulsa: 109
Tulane: 122
Memphis: 123
ECU: 273
USF: 281
The goal for the conference at this point is to sneak a 4th team in. If we do, we probably put more teams in than the PAC12 and possibly tie the big ten
Who is the fourth team going to be? Temple or SMU?
Most likely Temple. I can't see SMU beating any of the top 3 teams now without Foster.
RE: AAC RPI after 2/3 games - payday - 02-03-2018 08:21 PM
Ucla and Miss St both with solid RPI wins today. X is in OT vs GT. Bluitt makes a 4 pt play to put it in OT.
RE: AAC RPI after 2/3 games - sfink16 - 02-03-2018 08:50 PM
(02-03-2018 05:04 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote: After today's games.
Overall AAC Conference RPI: 7th (ick our OOC RPI and SOS is 22nd for both)
UC: 13
Wichita: 31
Houston: 39
Temple: 40
SMU: 65
UCF: 76
UCONN: 94
Tulsa: 109
Tulane: 122
Memphis: 123
ECU: 273
USF: 281
2 to 4 bid conference. Houston and Temple need to keep winning to up their resumes. I do not count Houston as a definite in at this time. As of now I'd say two are in and 2 on the bubble. Lots can change moving forward.
RE: AAC RPI after 2/3 games - HuskyU - 02-03-2018 08:55 PM
Temple is really interesting. I think 18 regular season wins and a first round AAC tourney win lands them in the First Four.
RE: AAC RPI after 2/3 games - thespiritof1976 - 02-03-2018 09:09 PM
Serious question here: what does ECU and USF need to do to elevate their programs ?
RE: AAC RPI after 2/3 games - sfink16 - 02-03-2018 09:58 PM
(02-03-2018 09:09 PM)thespiritof1976 Wrote: Serious question here: what does ECU and USF need to do to elevate their programs ?
Take a look at ECU's schedule. Their entire OOC was at home with the exception of Rutgers, there only power conference team on the schedule. Tell me if you see anything wrong with that pathetic schedul.
Take a look at USF's schedule. They too played only one power conference team in Indiana.
I think if you take a quick look at the schedules above you'll see that improvements need to be made.
RE: AAC RPI after 2/3 games - billybobby777 - 02-03-2018 11:04 PM
(02-03-2018 08:55 PM)HuskyU Wrote: Temple is really interesting. I think 18 regular season wins and a first round AAC tourney win lands them in the First Four.
If you haven’t noticed ECU has been playing very tough lately. Signs of life right now.
RE: AAC RPI after 2/3 games - BrooklynRocket - 02-03-2018 11:24 PM
Both ECU and USF should continue to improve.
ECU's lineup next year should look like
G - Fleming
G - Williams
G/F - Barkley
G/F - LeDay
F - Spasojevic
USF's should look like
G - Rideau
G - Collins
G/F - Lang
F - Yetna
C - Martin
Just gotta limit attrition for both rosters
RE: AAC RPI after 2/3 games - DowdyPirate2 - 02-03-2018 11:35 PM
(02-03-2018 11:24 PM)BrooklynRocket Wrote: Both ECU and USF should continue to improve.
ECU's lineup next year should look like
G - Fleming
G - Williams
G/F - Barkley
G/F - LeDay
F - Spasojevic
USF's should look like
G - Rideau
G - Collins
G/F - Lang
F - Yetna
C - Martin
Just gotta limit attrition for both rosters
Jeremy Sheppard is probably better than Fleming.
ECU also has a solid class, Jayden Gardner will help in the post he’s averaging 25 and 15 in the CAP8 conference which is as about as good as it gets in NC. Had numerous offers, most notable being VCU.
Mike Wynn is a SG who also had numerous mid-major offers. Probably wont be playing major minutes next year, but seems decent.
Deshaun Wade is a SG, had two other offers from NJIT and MD Eastern Shore
And Rico Quenton is a center who has no other reported offers but has put up some ridiculous stats for Dyer County who is pretty good according to the Memphis fans.
RE: AAC RPI after 2/3 games - fishpro1098 - 02-03-2018 11:35 PM
(02-03-2018 09:09 PM)thespiritof1976 Wrote: Serious question here: what does ECU and USF need to do to elevate their programs ?
Recruit the I-95 corridor. ECU may need to changes its name to confuse recruits. Something like Carolina Tar Devils.
RE: AAC RPI after 2/3 games - BrooklynRocket - 02-03-2018 11:40 PM
(02-03-2018 11:35 PM)DowdyPirate2 Wrote:(02-03-2018 11:24 PM)BrooklynRocket Wrote: Both ECU and USF should continue to improve.
ECU's lineup next year should look like
G - Fleming
G - Williams
G/F - Barkley
G/F - LeDay
F - Spasojevic
USF's should look like
G - Rideau
G - Collins
G/F - Lang
F - Yetna
C - Martin
Just gotta limit attrition for both rosters
Jeremy Sheppard is probably better than Fleming.
ECU also has a solid class, Jayden Gardner will help in the post he’s averaging 25 and 15 in the CAP8 conference which is as about as good as it gets in NC. Had numerous offers, most notable being VCU.
Mike Wynn is a SG who also had numerous mid-major offers. Probably wont be playing major minutes next year, but seems decent.
Deshaun Wade is a SG, had two other offers from NJIT and MD Eastern Shore
And Rico Quenton is a center who has no other reported offers but has put up some ridiculous stats for Dyer County who is pretty good according to the Memphis fans.
I wasn't sure of Sheppard's status and if he was expected to return. If he and Wilkins get their sh*t together then all the better.
RE: AAC RPI after 2/3 games - Nevadanatural - 02-03-2018 11:48 PM
Equally important to improving the team is improving the schedule. In terms of RPI it’s better to lose to a good team than it is to beat a horrible one and if you lose to a horrible one it’s a double whammy.
RE: AAC RPI after 2/3 games - payday - 02-04-2018 12:52 AM
Cincy up to 11