(01-12-2018 09:09 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  To be clear - there’s a big difference between saying someone is unfit (a criticism) and someone should be removed from office because of their unfitness (an action), just as there is between saying, here are the issues created by removing someone from Office because they aren’t “unfit” even if how they act does make you question it (a valid critique), and please define unfit for me (a deflection technique).

So the following is doublespeak?

Quote:There isn’t, and shouldn’t be, a defined test, outside of immediate eligibility requirements, to either be elected to or maintain the presidency. A process such as that would be ripe for misuse and abuse. I think an annual physical that includes mental cognition would be ideal, and requiring that the overall health of POTUS (conducted by multiple docs) be released to the public or House/Senate. That way, should a true neurologically disorder be found in any future President, action could be taken.

I read that as you saying, "There shouldn't be a defined test... but there should be a defined test."