Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
AAC 'Power Six' push, UCF title claim irritate at least some Group of Five brethren
Author Message
bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 66,967
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 3320
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #58
RE: AAC 'Power Six' push, UCF title claim irritate at least some Group of Five brethren
(03-02-2018 11:07 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(03-02-2018 09:19 AM)johnbragg Wrote:  
(03-02-2018 07:16 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(03-01-2018 08:57 PM)CougarRed Wrote:  
(03-01-2018 08:39 PM)10thMountain Wrote:  Being a P conference is not having to advertise that you're a P conference

Tell that to all the Bama fans who get so defensive when it is pointed out UCF won the national title per at least one legit (former BCS) poll.

Laughing at UCF isn't being 'defensive'. 03-lmfao

Colley-Matrix isn't a poll, it's a computer, and it means nothing to be chosen #1 by a computer.

Tell that to UCF's banner.

You understand that anyone can create a banner, right?

I just created a USF is #1 banner. Does that count too?

Surely, for the past 40 years, since the AP and Coaches both decided to do their final polls after the bowls, the ONLY valid claim to a share of a national title is if either the coaches or AP poll selected you, or if you won the BCS or CFP.

Nebraska and Michigan 1997? That's a split title. Both can claim a share.

UCF? None of that.

We know other title claims from the past are bogus. That doesn't make UCF's any less bogus. It's B-O-G-U-S. 07-coffee3

I would consider it the only valid claim, but opinions can differ. Those polls have their biases. One computer poll listed in the NCAA record book-Rothman's FACT often declared multiple national champions. 1977 was Notre Dame, Arkansas and Texas. Another non-computer system listed, the National Championship Foundation in 1981 had Clemson, Nebraska, Pitt, SMU and Texas. Note that Texas doesn't claim either of those.

In 1982 Penn St. was first in all but a couple of polls (Berryman had Nebraska and Helms had SMU), but SMU did have a better record than Penn St. 11-0-1 with only a tie to #8 Arkansas while Penn St. lost by 21 to #17 Alabama. Auburn could also point to 2004 where USC was unanimous but did get that title vacated. Auburn didn't get a chance to play. In both those cases, schools with a history of getting on probation were lower ranked (not that there weren't other good reasons for the rankings).
03-02-2018 11:42 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: AAC 'Power Six' push, UCF title claim irritate at least some Group of Five brethren - bullet - 03-02-2018 11:42 AM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.