(05-04-2015 04:27 PM)vandiver49 Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 11:41 AM)BamaScorpio69 Wrote:  Wheldon said they completely cut out Ms. Marvel's part in the movie. He felt it would have been a little much to add her, Vision, Scarlet Witch, and Quicksilver in the same movie. I expect that she will be introduced in either the Guardians of the Galaxy or Cap's next movie.

They should just give Captain Marvel her own movie. It's the only way people will be happy.

She's getting her own movie in Phase 3. I'm looking forward to it because Carol Danvers is one of my favorite characters, with Kamala Khan and Monica Rambeau right behind her.

(05-04-2015 08:44 PM)PirateTreasureNC Wrote:  

(05-04-2015 04:26 PM)vandiver49 Wrote:  I felt the problem was that the first Avengers was a movie of convergence of the Phase I Marvel Universe. Avengers: AoU is more of a divergent film to start Phase III. They spent an inordinate amount of time trying to phase out the original line up, introduce new members and drop hints for upcoming movies that the Ultron story-line was IMO pointless.

Not sure about all your statements but...

Ultron in the commercials felt way more sinister than the version I actually saw in the movie. He wasn't "Evillll (Dr. Evil voice over)" enough. I don't mind the cast expanding... but considering Ant Man, Wasp( I believe that was her name), and Black Panther being no shows? Especially when Thor has a new one coming and they have yet to figure out how to do Hulk "right."

I'm fine with no Ant-Man for now, and I doubt we get Wasp, although it would be nice if we did. Black Panther is getting introduced proper in Civil War, so that should be fun. I think we got a lot to get him riled up in AoU, with Stark and Hulk basically demolishing Johannesburg.