(06-07-2014 08:25 PM)dopeordogfood Wrote:  

(06-07-2014 07:26 PM)Tbringer Wrote:  Let's see what did I miss today--

ACC fans gang busting on the Big 12, WVU and the poster known as Buckaineer....ACC fans accusing me of being someone else --because if you don't fly the ACC colors on these boards--you must be someone else I guess?.... and ACC fans celebrating having the lowest tv contract of the P5 (or whatever they go by now) conferences-and pretending its better than everyone else's. Yeah, I'd say that about covers it. Nothing new here.

It is interesting to note that Maryland stated the ACC would be paying out $20 million per member by 2014 for everything. Not surprising its right as expected to be. Based on the fact that has played out as it was reported--by 2017 the Big Ten will be about $19 to $20 million ahead of ACC payouts.

you've been busy today spinning the ACC contract haven't you "Buck"? lol. If you are not Buckaineer, you and the "dodge" poster argue just like Buck.

I've been busy today--but not on a message board and no I'm not "Buck". Now which one are you? Maize? Terry D? or one of the other ACC "personalities regularly gang slamming others on this board and elsewhere who don't agree with your odd views.

It might surprise you to step out of this message board and realize everyone doesn't share your narrow views on things by a long shot--and yes other people that have different views than you may share similar thoughts with each other.

Let's recap the week.

Yes let's--although first let me say that you ACC people provide lots of laughs outside your small circles. You bash West Virginia and its posters constantly for some reason, but some of the nutjob things you come up here put those posters that used to post there--"the Dude" and "MHver3" to shame with their incredible fantasies such as the Big 12 dissolving, or the Big 12 only being UT and OU as if there aren't any other schools there.

• SEC and Big 12 release conference disbursements
  

This lead to two things. 1st we went into detail about the complex multimedia deals that teams have. Big 12 teams have TV in theirs, others do not. In the end, it was determined no advantage to anyone but Texas because teams from other leagues also make extra money outside of conference TV money on multimedia deals too. The TV portion of about 70% of the schools in the Big 12 was not substantial enough to separate them from other conferences that pool their tier 3 . That lead to the second big discussion. Team revenue from 2012-2013 were discussed and most detractors felt that due to all the money flowing into the Big 12, more teams should at least be Top 25-30 in revenue. That point was adverted and focus was directed at subsidies because certain teams that were looked down upon by B12 fans were right there with the Big 12 teams in terms of revenue.

Once again this is just laughable. You have decided that every conference but the Big 12 makes money from its tier 3 tv product. Wow--talk about nutjobs. Of course the Big 12 makes revenues others don't from television for their tier 3 media rights. Those schools also make the same money everyone else does for their multimedia, sponsorship and royalty type rights. Its two different things. Last fiscal year there were four top twenty five Big 12 teams and 0 ACC schools in the top 20 btw. The highest ranked ACC school was FSU, and they barely made the top 25 at 24. The top ranked Big 12 school was number one Texas and OU also made the top ten as well. The entire conference made the top 50 revenue schools. What your "thesis" of course ignores is that schools make revenues on their own in addition to media rights--ticket sales, parking, various different revenue streams account for differences. Still, from the P5 conferences the Big 12 is bringing in as much from media rights as anyone, while the ACC schools are dead last and the gap will increase.

• ACC finally releases disbursements
  

At first it was a running joke on the BGN Big 12 board they were hiding the info due to it being so low, etc.
Let's note that the Big 12 never has the most money distributed due to the low number of teams. They always lay claim to having the "highest payout per team" due to having "less mouths to feed". So the ACC releases their disbursement at $291 million or so divided among 14 teams, it averages out around $20.6 or 8 million dollars, right in the same level as the SEC.
At first, you could hear a rat pee on cotton over there but then here comes ole Buckaineer. LOL The conversation twists from sheer numbers to dealing in semantics on what a full share is. 8 teams getting $23 million and 2 getting $15 million is what you call not getting a full share. A team getting $19.6 million and one getting $18M and one $16.9M sounds like a full share but adjusted for travel and bowl game performance. Big Difference!


Now the focus from a certain poster seems to be on saying that the ACC is giving away Maryland's share and stealing from Notre Dame's share(how can you steal from Notre Dame when the eers always label them as greedy bloodsuckers?)

other than that, you haven't missed much