i just remembered something funny...

i said earlier if the shoes were flipped, uc fans would definitely be flipping out...a few cincy fans said they wouldn't..i literally just remembered 2 years ago in the UH/Cincy football game, houston completely blew out cincy but there was a controversial call, houston was at the cincy goal-line and tried to quickly go for it on 4th down...cincy players thought it was a false start, and jumped the line thinking it would stop the play and a flag would be thrown...no flag is thrown (houston players stop moving thinking theyll be flag) and cincy gets a wide open sack on our QB...but the cincy player grabs wards facemask as he is tackling him and houston got an auto first down

despite the fact that it was a blowout and that play likely didnt make a difference in the bigger picture. (and the fact that the no call on the false start actually helped them get a unblocked tackle/sack on ward) cincy fans for 3 weeks went on non stop ranting about the no call on the false start (and saying the facemask didnt happen, even though video proof was given)..to think if the refs favored houston heavily and houston won, cincy fans would be okay with it is laughable

sidenote: i find this weird.. houston fans and cincy fans just watched a game, we both witnessed what happened. someone claims something happened in the game, instead of rebutting with what they think happened in the game, since we both just watched it...their rebuttal is bringing up historical stats..stats that dont even say houston fouls as much as given in the game... why are we using historical stats on a game we just watched...its like debating if a catch was actually a catch by looking at the WRs historical drop rate