(02-05-2018 02:17 PM)justinhub2003 Wrote:  

(02-05-2018 12:38 PM)C0|db|00ded Wrote:  

(02-05-2018 12:35 PM)geef Wrote:  

(02-05-2018 12:31 PM)thespiritof1976 Wrote:  Cincinnati only moved up to 6 ? That's crap.

It's where we should be. We're closer to 5 than to 7, and the team at 5 (Xavier) beat us earlier this year. All good.

Not just beat, destroyed. Perhaps the weakest #6 team in the history of rankings?

What's even more hilarious is how on earth we're still ranked. We're barely a top 40 team right now.


T


...

Go check Michigan’s states terrible resume.

UC has 4 tier 1 wins vs MSU’s 2
UC has 7 tier 2 wins vs MSU’s 4

We have 11 tier 1&2 wins to their 6.

Even worse for them , they only have 1 tier 1 chance left and it’s against Purdue.

UC’s Next 3 of 4 games are to tier 1 opponents. And we have a 4th with WSU to end the year.

We can debate if Michigan state is better then us and I’m fine with that but their resume is god aweful. And they failed to protect home court this year already.

Good post. This is why I'm cautiously optimistic about UC's resume. The committee has never used tier 1, tier 2 before so it's harder to say how they'll use it compared with how they've used rpi top 25,50,100 wins the last several years. If they use it in a similar manner, UC could already be higher than most people think.