(02-08-2018 12:05 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  What's more important the number of stars a player has or the NA. pos. rank?

Other wise if player 1 was a 3 star player and had a NA. POS. Rank of 210 in one class and player 2 with a NA. POS, Ranking of 125 and a 2 star in another class.

The 3 star is the #210 best player at his position and the 2 star is #125 at his... Which one of those should be the better player to recruit? Do you go with the stars or get the best player you can at the position needed?

I'd definitely get the best player you can at the position needed. In my opinion, two of the tougher positions for G5 programs to recruit are the OL/DL. And if you look at this recruiting class, the G5 doesn't get as many highly-rated OT/DT as we do at WR/RB for example. So if you have 3* WR at #210 and 2* OT at #125, I'd recruit the OT over the WR; especially if it was a position of need and you've already have a good running core.