Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Early 2004 ACC basketball predictions
Author Message
nate jonesacc
Unregistered

 
Post: #1
 
If Roy or Larry Brown comes to UNC

1) Duke
2) State
3) UNC
4) Tech
5) UVA
6) Wake
7) Maryland
8) FSU
9) Clemson

If Roy and Brown don't come

1) Duke
2) State
3) Tech
4) UVA
5) Wake
6) Maryland
7) UNC
8) FSU
9) Clemson
04-02-2003 11:21 PM
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


DamascusTerp2
Unregistered

 
Post: #2
 
keep sleepin on the terps...we like it that way...
04-02-2003 11:56 PM
Quote this message in a reply
T-Monay820
Unregistered

 
Post: #3
 
Duke
NCSU
UNC
Wake
MD
UVa
GT
Clemson
FSU

It'll be close for 2nd-7th.
04-03-2003 12:10 AM
Quote this message in a reply
techfan4
Unregistered

 
Post: #4
 
hmm, sorry, UNC won't just have instant success when a coach comes.

1.Dook
2.NCSU
2.Tech
4.Maryland
5.UNC
6.FSU
7.Wake
8.UVA
9.Clemson
04-03-2003 06:46 AM
Quote this message in a reply
nate jonesacc
Unregistered

 
Post: #5
 
DamascusTerp2 Wrote:keep sleepin on the terps...we like it that way...
Well when you lose basically your entire starting 5... you're not gonna get much respect.
04-03-2003 11:15 AM
Quote this message in a reply
DamascusTerp2
Unregistered

 
Post: #6
 
nate jonesacc Wrote:
DamascusTerp2 Wrote:keep sleepin on the terps...we like it that way...
Well when you lose basically your entire starting 5... you're not gonna get much respect.
I am well aware of this...
04-05-2003 12:34 AM
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


techfan4
Unregistered

 
Post: #7
 
DT knows what he is talking about.l

-Gilchrist has the potential to be one of the best PG's in the nation
-Caner-Medley will get more looks this year. He's a great shooter
-Garrison is going to be awesome
-Jamar Smith played in 30 games, and will offer speed and height
-Big time prospect Michael Jones will definately be a factor
-Ibekwe, a 6'9'' C/F has the body of Chris Bosh. Long arms, tall, and thin.
-And you can never forget recruits D.J. Strawberry, Hassan Fofana, or Will Bowers.

Maryland will be young, but they'll be good.
04-05-2003 09:40 AM
Quote this message in a reply
nate jonesacc
Unregistered

 
Post: #8
 
Sorry... but when you lose your entire starting 5... you need a handful of blue chip recruits to be good the next year. Michael Jones is the only one of the incomers who is a blue chipper.

If you don't think the absence of Blake is going to MAUL Maryland, you're kidding yourself. You have no clue how reliant you were last year.
04-05-2003 09:46 AM
Quote this message in a reply
DamascusTerp2
Unregistered

 
Post: #9
 
nate jonesacc Wrote:You have no clue how reliant you were last year.
and I guess you do, huh? :rolleyes:

I am more than confident in the skillz of Gilchrist next year...you should be very afraid...

IMHO we upgrade at almost every position next year in terms of skill level and with time will come experience and confidence...

like i said earlier, you keep sleeping on the terps and pay more attention to how one, if not both, of your blue chippers this year will be in the NBA next year and not in Durham...
04-05-2003 01:06 PM
Quote this message in a reply
nate jonesacc
Unregistered

 
Post: #10
 
DamascusTerp2 Wrote:
nate jonesacc Wrote:You have no clue how reliant you were last year.
and I guess you do, huh? :rolleyes:

I am more than confident in the skillz of Gilchrist next year...you should be very afraid...

IMHO we upgrade at almost every position next year in terms of skill level and with time will come experience and confidence...

like i said earlier, you keep sleeping on the terps and pay more attention to how one, if not both, of your blue chippers this year will be in the NBA next year and not in Durham...
PLEASE... let's make a bet... PLEASE!

Both Humphries and Deng will be at Duke. PLEASE make a bet with me. I don't know if you want to though... remember what happened last time? NCM = ACC ROY! I'll tell you what... Duke had 3 guys who were closer to ACC ROY than NCM was buddy.

And your upgrades????

Blake > Gilchrist
Nicholas > McCray or Jones
McCall = NCM
Randle > Garrison, Fofana or Ibekwe
Holden > Garrison, Fofana or Ibekwe
04-05-2003 04:47 PM
Quote this message in a reply
techfan4
Unregistered

 
Post: #11
 
Give Garrison, Jones, and Gilchrist one season, and they'll be better than Randle Nicholas, and Blake

And...

NCM is better than McCall.
04-05-2003 05:29 PM
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


DamascusTerp2
Unregistered

 
Post: #12
 
nate..you are silly (or just plain stoned) with your comparisons...

btw, who would you say had a more productive season, NCM or SHAV? :laugh:

and who were the 3 dookies that were closer to ACC ROY than Nik?

FYI: if David Stern and his possee get their age limit enacted...look for one or both of the dookie recruits to bolt...I mean, why wouldn't they? If they don't go this year, they are stuck until the are 20...
04-05-2003 10:10 PM
Quote this message in a reply
techfan4
Unregistered

 
Post: #13
 
DamascusTerp2 Wrote:btw, who would you say had a more productive season, NCM or SHAV? :laugh:

and who were the 3 dookies that were closer to ACC ROY than Nik?
1) NCM
2) Did Duke HAVE 3 rookies? Oh yeah, that guy named Dockery who everone thought was good, but only played like 5 minutes a game. :rolleyes:

DT is once again right.
04-05-2003 10:19 PM
Quote this message in a reply
nate jonesacc
Unregistered

 
Post: #14
 
DamascusTerp2 Wrote:nate..you are silly (or just plain stoned) with your comparisons...

btw, who would you say had a more productive season, NCM or SHAV? :laugh:

and who were the 3 dookies that were closer to ACC ROY than Nik?

FYI: if David Stern and his possee get their age limit enacted...look for one or both of the dookie recruits to bolt...I mean, why wouldn't they? If they don't go this year, they are stuck until the are 20...
Of course Shav did... IN LESS MINUTES...

He averaged more points and rebounds than NCM.

JJ, Shelden and Shav were all closer to ACC ROY than NCM.

Why wouldn't they make the jump? Maybe because their care about a college education. Novel idea... :rolleyes:
04-05-2003 10:45 PM
Quote this message in a reply
nate jonesacc
Unregistered

 
Post: #15
 
techfan4 Wrote:
DamascusTerp2 Wrote:btw, who would you say had a more productive season, NCM or SHAV?   :laugh:  

and who were the 3 dookies that were closer to ACC ROY than Nik?
1) NCM
2) Did Duke HAVE 3 rookies? Oh yeah, that guy named Dockery who everone thought was good, but only played like 5 minutes a game. :rolleyes:

DT is once again right.
Shelden Williams (2nd team all rookie), JJ Redick (1st team all Rookie) and Shav were all clearly better than NCM.

Look up the stats guys. Shav had better stats IN LESS MINUTES, nonetheless.
04-05-2003 10:46 PM
Quote this message in a reply
techfan4
Unregistered

 
Post: #16
 
If Caner-Medley had shot more, you would've seen better numbers.
04-05-2003 10:52 PM
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


nate jonesacc
Unregistered

 
Post: #17
 
techfan4 Wrote:If Caner-Medley had shot more, you would've seen better numbers.
The same can easily be said for Shav. If Shav played as much as NCM did... he would have put up far better numbers than NCM.

You wanna refute what else I said?
04-05-2003 11:02 PM
Quote this message in a reply
DamascusTerp2
Unregistered

 
Post: #18
 
shav sure was producing big number from that duke bench late in the season, huh? and don't give me this bull**** about him being injured because he was jumping up and down like a maniac during the ncaa tournament with the rest of the bench warmers...

face it..your boy was a complete bust this season...who knows what he will do in the future, but he didn't live up to even half the hype that he had coming in...



<!--EDIT|DamascusTerp2|Apr 6 2003, 12:45 AM-->
04-06-2003 12:37 AM
Quote this message in a reply
nate jonesacc
Unregistered

 
Post: #19
 
DamascusTerp2 Wrote:shav sure was producing big number from that duke bench late in the season, huh? and don't give me this bull**** about him being injured because he was jumping up and down like a maniac during the ncaa tournament with the rest of the bench warmers...

face it..your boy was a complete bust this season...who knows what he will do in the future, but he didn't live up to even half the hype that he had coming in...
LOL... complete bust, eh?

He was injured until the NCAA tournament. By then, he was out of shape (similar to Sean May) and wouldn't have been 100%.

Well that complete bust had a better year than ANY of your freshmen. Man... you must have some sucky freshmen! :eek:
04-06-2003 12:32 PM
Quote this message in a reply
techfan4
Unregistered

 
Post: #20
 
Gilchrist and Caner-Medley played better.
04-06-2003 01:00 PM
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.