</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by techfan4:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Doc NoleCat:
And to Liquid Karma, who asks, "Hey DocNole - Would you mind taking your little anti-BPD crusade to the Verbal Assault forum?"
First, that's not my handle. Second, I'm not on an "anti-BPD crusade." I was on a "crusade" to address flames like the one above. Trust me, I'm done with this. But finally, if certain posters can use this forum for garbage like what I quoted above, would you mind explaining to me what I have said that merits moving to the VA forum? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="confused.gif" /> </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">he's saying that we dont need BPD threads in the ACC Conference Talk forum. And as moderator, I think we are getting off the subject, and I dont like them either.
So if you want to talk about this..go to Verbal Assault...or talk about it through PM/E-mail
but we dont want it on the forums
Thanks
-T4</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I will ask you a question...
When I first responded to BPD, it was after he
flamed and threatened the guy from Duke.
There were no comments by the moderators, posted
against BPD.
I, for one and BTW, "I'm not the only one," who
liked the idea that BlueDevil had posted, was just
giving the "Forum Bully" a taste of his own medicine.
It was BlueDevil's thread, not BPD's. It was on
topic. Are we not allowed to defend another member's post? Is it OK, for this blow hard, to
spout off, but not OK, for anyone else to respond?
Did y'all invite BPD, to "take it to verbal
assault?"
His remark's to BlueDevil were totally uncalled
for.
I would challenge all the "moderator's" to find
any former post by me, that was negative toward
any ACC institution, especially when it involved
playing against teams from outside the ACC.
But, I will show you plenty of remarks made about
Florida State. Plenty of support given to non-ACC
members competing against the Seminoles.
Plenty of this "Criminole" and "Non-educated"
garbage...from the so-called intellectuals.
It is one thing to "trash talk" when our teams
are facing each other, but it is another thing,
to support institutions whose teams do not
have "ACC Patches" sewn on their uniforms.
When you read about how "weak" the ACC is, that
is a put-down to all of us. When any ACC team
is beaten by Non-Conference teams, it is a "loss"
for all of us.
The Big East and the ACC are constantly cast as
the weakest BCS conferences, yet these two leagues
won the most "bowl games" last year of all the
BCS leagues. However, when the magazines hit the
newstands this past June, there was the ACC and the Big East, once again ranked as numbers 5 and
6.
I will tell you...that it bothered me when WF, lost to NIU. It actually hurt a little when the
Field Goal by the Clemson kicker came up short,
especially against an SEC team!
But from what I have read for the past 6 months,
I am convinced that there were plenty "ACC" fans
who were pulling for Iowa State to score.
And that, just like this "bias"..."take it to verbal assault"...comments by so-called non-partisan moderator's...is Bull $hit!
|