<a href="http://www.collegefootballnews.com/acc/2002_Previews/2002_ACC_PreviewFREE.htm" target="_blank">Link</a>

The predictions:

1. Florida State
2. North Carolina
3. Virginia
4. Maryland
5. Clemson
6. Georgia Tech
7. NC State
8. Wake Forest
9. Duke

-JD

Wake will be better than 8th

UNC and UVA will finish lower than that.

Wake, State, and probably Clemson will finish higher than that.

This is one of the worst predictions I have seen. Does this person even watch football? UNC will have one of the best rushing attacks? They lost their entire DL, but they will still finish 2nd?

UVA has DL problems and depth problems at RB, but they will finish third?

This guy is an idiot.

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">UNC and UVA will finish lower than that.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Well, that's good to know! Now I don't have to waste my time watching all those stupid games.... <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="rolleyes.gif" />

-JD

ESPN has some newer ones up... check it out..

<a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/index" target="_blank">http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/index</a>

GT higher, UNC & UVA lower

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by JD Heel:
<a href="http://www.collegefootballnews.com/acc/2002_Previews/2002_ACC_PreviewFREE.htm" target="_blank">Link</a>

The predictions:

1. Florida State
2. North Carolina
3. Virginia
4. Maryland
5. Clemson
6. Georgia Tech
7. NC State
8. Wake Forest
9. Duke

-JD</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">SOUNDS GOOD TO ME !!!!

Survivor IV - Challenge #15

Replying to this thread first will allow you to subtract 20 points from any player!

<small>[ May 22, 2002, 03:43 PM: Message edited by: Upper Deck Chevy ]</small>

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Upper Deck Chevy:
I've never seen so many teams over- and underrated in one prediction.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I'm not defending any of his picks, but I don't think we can know this until the season starts.

Personally, I think 2-7 is basically wide open (and Wake can move up into the middle somewhere too).

-JD

Here's what it will look like in 2002.
1. Florida State
2. NC State
3. Clemson
4. Maryland
5. Wake Forest
6. Georgia Tech
7. Virginia
8. North Carolina
9. Duke

If we finish eighth with the offense we're going to have, I'll eat my hat. No lie....

-JD

It's very easy for these guys making predictions to pick Florida State first, Wake and Duke eighth and ninth, and then randomly assign two through seven. That's what these so called experts have been doing for years.

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Big Pimpin Deac:
It's very easy for these guys making predictions to pick Florida State first, Wake and Duke eighth and ninth, and then randomly assign two through seven. That's what these so called experts have been doing for years.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I'll agree with that (about the only thing that BPD and I agree on, I think)....

-JD

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by TIGERFREAK:
Here's what it will look like in 2002.
1. Florida State
2. NC State
3. Clemson
4. Maryland
5. Wake Forest
6. Georgia Tech
7. Virginia
8. North Carolina
9. Duke</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">CU, WF, UMD > GT
<img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="confused.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="confused.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="confused.gif" />

You <img border="0" alt="[Drinky]" title="" src="graemlins/drinky.gif" /> too much <img border="0" alt="[NoNo]" title="" src="graemlins/nono.gif" />

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by JD Heel:

I'll agree with that (about the only thing that BPD and I agree on, I think)....

-JD</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I'm sure we have some similar ideas concerning Devils and Wolves. <img border="0" alt="[Cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/cheers.gif" />

<small>[ May 22, 2002, 01:46 PM: Message edited by: Big Pimpin Deac ]</small>

I'm here!

<a href="http://www.ncaabbs.com/forums/ncaa/boards/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=14;t=000170#000030" target="_blank">Survivor</a>

-JD

The Tigers will finish higher than 5th in the conference.

We'll just have to wait and see how the season unfolds. GT - you're going down again this year!