Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

Big Pimpin Deac · 08-20-2002 11:04 AM

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Liquid Karma:
My hat's off to you for perpetuating the Broderick story even though it has been dead for years. Hell, even the Republican'ts in Congress dropped it once she changed her story not once, but twice(the second time when Starr subpeoned her).

Oh, and BPD, irregardless is actually a word. It is a nonstandard usage that is now accepted and included in both the <a href="http://www.dictionary.com/search?q=irregardless" target="_blank">American Heritage Dictionary</a> and the <a href="http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary" target="_blank">Merriam-Webster Dictionary.</a>

It is recommended that you use regardless instead, but it is a word regardless or what you say.<hr /></blockquote>Republicant's, that's cute. That's almost as cute as saying Democraps.

Oh, I forgot. You would never beat a dead horse. How could I even think about bringing something that happened years ago?

It's just amazing that all I have to do is say Juanita Broderick's name and liberals like you and pee5 immediately jump to Clinton's defense and start linking articles and quoting your heroes. Did it happen? I don't know for sure. Do I think it did? Yes.

You're correct about irregardless being a word. I was just wondering which proper word you were trying to say.

[ August 20, 2002, 12:08 PM: Message edited by: Big Pimpin Deac ]

Big Pimpin Deac · 08-20-2002 11:06 AM

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Liquid Karma:
<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Big Pimpin Deac:
Whatever.<hr /></blockquote>Your ignorance of world history is amazing.<hr /></blockquote>What a coincidence. Your ignorance often amazes me.

Liquid Karma · 08-20-2002 11:32 AM

When you post a dismissive comment such as "whatever" you should at least defend your position. You may consider my point of view ignorant, but you can never fault me for not taking the time to explain that point of view.

And the reason some of us liberals get worked up over things like Broderick is that there it's false. You believe it, yet the accuser has publicly changed her story numerous times. There is plenty of bad thigns Clinton did do that you don't have to go digging for bs like that. I can't defend against things such as He humidored a fat intern or He perjured himself, but I sure as hell can defend against baseless claims of rape.

Liquid Karma · 08-20-2002 11:37 AM

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Big Pimpin Deac:
What a coincidence. Your ignorance often amazes me.<hr /></blockquote>Care to cite a specific example?

Cue reference to Dave Odom debates we've had...

p5mmr9 · 08-20-2002 12:22 PM

I find it amazing that these two quotes were posted by the same poster on the same thread...

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Big Pimpin Deac:
Oh, let's change the subject once I mention Juanita Broderick. How convenient. I am willing to bet that even if you know who she is, you will not admit it.<hr /></blockquote> <blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Big Pimpin Deac:
It's just amazing that all I have to do is say Juanita Broderick's name and liberals like you and pee5 immediately jump to Clinton's defense and start linking articles and quoting your heroes. Did it happen? I don't know for sure. Do I think it did? Yes.<hr /></blockquote>You accused me of not knowing Broderick. I responded...not sure what your point is here...

And your contradiction is most amusing...

[ August 20, 2002, 01:30 PM: Message edited by: p5mmr9 ]

p5mmr9 · 08-20-2002 12:29 PM

By the way, what are you basing your ["Do I think it...[happened]? Yes,"] ...proclamation?

Big Pimpin Deac · 08-20-2002 12:44 PM

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Liquid Karma:
When you post a dismissive comment such as "whatever" you should at least defend your position. You may consider my point of view ignorant, but you can never fault me for not taking the time to explain that point of view.

And the reason some of us liberals get worked up over things like Broderick is that there it's false. You believe it, yet the accuser has publicly changed her story numerous times. There is plenty of bad thigns Clinton did do that you don't have to go digging for bs like that. I can't defend against things such as He humidored a fat intern or He perjured himself, but I sure as hell can defend against baseless claims of rape.<hr /></blockquote>My saying "whatever" is similar to your saying, "talk about a f*cking straw, man" and then dropping it. Take it however you want. I really don't care.

Big Pimpin Deac · 08-20-2002 12:49 PM

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Liquid Karma:
<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Big Pimpin Deac:
What a coincidence. Your ignorance often amazes me.<hr /></blockquote>Care to cite a specific example?

Cue reference to Dave Odom debates we've had...<hr /></blockquote>Are you sure you want me to? That would once again stray from your topic, which you freaked out about earlier. You called me ignorant, I called you ignorant, just like two kids on the playground.

For the record, you brought up Odom, not me. But, since you did, I have an interesting proposition for you that could settle that debate once and for all. However, I would like to discuss that privately.

Liquid Karma · 08-20-2002 12:51 PM

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Big Pimpin Deac:
Are you sure you want me to?.<hr /></blockquote>Bring it, just be able to defend your position.

Big Pimpin Deac · 08-20-2002 12:56 PM

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by p5mmr9:
I find it amazing that these two quotes were posted by the same poster on the same thread...

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Big Pimpin Deac:
Oh, let's change the subject once I mention Juanita Broderick. How convenient. I am willing to bet that even if you know who she is, you will not admit it.<hr /></blockquote> <blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Big Pimpin Deac:
It's just amazing that all I have to do is say Juanita Broderick's name and liberals like you and pee5 immediately jump to Clinton's defense and start linking articles and quoting your heroes. Did it happen? I don't know for sure. Do I think it did? Yes.<hr /></blockquote>You accused me of not knowing Broderick. I responded...not sure what your point is here...

And your contradiction is most amusing...
<hr /></blockquote>Please tell me how those statements contradict each other. I said that I didn't think you would acknowledge being familiar with her. Then you said you were. Then I gave credit to you for acknowledging this, so I backed off of that statement. Then I said I thought it was amazing that all I had to do was mention her name and all of a sudden I'm getting links to articles and quotes.

Let me explain this so you can understand, pee5. It's fun for me to piss off liberals like you and watch you scramble for information to prove your point. You are the amusing one.

Liquid Karma · 08-20-2002 01:03 PM

Likewise it is fun for us to prove right wingers wrong on so much of this sh*t. It's a daily exercise made easier by the abundance of information out there to negate most of the usual BS from the right.

p5mmr9 · 08-20-2002 01:14 PM

how did I scramble?

p5mmr9 · 08-20-2002 01:14 PM

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by p5mmr9:
By the way, what are you basing your ["Do I think it...[happened]? Yes,"] ...proclamation?<hr /></blockquote>You never answered this question.

Big Pimpin Deac · 08-20-2002 01:15 PM

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Liquid Karma:
Likewise it is fun for us to prove right wingers wrong on so much of this sh*t. It's a daily exercise made easier by the abundance of information out there to negate most of the usual BS from the right.<hr /></blockquote>If you only knew how far to the right you really are.

Liquid Karma · 08-20-2002 01:17 PM

I have my right leaning tendencies and my left leaning ones.

p5mmr9 · 08-20-2002 01:19 PM

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Big Pimpin Deac:
Please tell me how those statements contradict each other.<hr /></blockquote>First you remark that we (liberals) try to change the subject whenever Broderick's name is mentioned...

Then you remark that we (liberals) "immediately jump to Clinton's defense," whenever Broderick's name is mentioned...

So, which is it?

[b]con

Big Pimpin Deac · 08-20-2002 01:24 PM

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by p5mmr9:
<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by p5mmr9:
By the way, what are you basing your ["Do I think it...[happened]? Yes,"] ...proclamation?<hr /></blockquote>You never answered this question.<hr /></blockquote>I was stating my opinion. Nothing more. Does that satisfy your question?

p5mmr9 · 08-20-2002 01:27 PM

Well, I'm assuming you're basing your opinion/conviction on something. So, what are you using to formulate this opinion...you know, the opinion that Clinton is a rapist.

What? Please tell me, because I think the charge is quite serious. I know you wouldn't just say that out of political dislike for the man. You must be basing this on some sort of factual evidence. I'd like to hear it. I would never support a rapist. So, please tell me what you know.

[ August 20, 2002, 02:28 PM: Message edited by: p5mmr9 ]

Big Pimpin Deac · 08-20-2002 01:34 PM

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Liquid Karma:
<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Big Pimpin Deac:
Are you sure you want me to?.<hr /></blockquote>Bring it, just be able to defend your position.<hr /></blockquote>Talk about getting off on a tangent. You called me ignorant because of my World History knowledge. My only statement that prompted that was "whatever". Like I said, take that word however you want. Then, I said your ignorance amazes me, too. I wasn't talking about Dave Odom arguments or your favorite beer or your knowledge of World History. It comes down to politics. You think my thinking is ignorant because I'm conservative. I think your's is ignorant because you're liberal.

Big Pimpin Deac · 08-20-2002 01:44 PM

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by p5mmr9:
<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Big Pimpin Deac:
Please tell me how those statements contradict each other.<hr /></blockquote>First you remark that we (liberals) try to change the subject whenever Broderick's name is mentioned...

Then you remark that we (liberals) "immediately jump to Clinton's defense," whenever Broderick's name is mentioned...

So, which is it?

[b]con

Threaded Mode \| Linear Mode So, how many of you out there threw a fit when Clinton allow
Author	Message