Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Third Tier rights
Author Message
catdaddy_2402 Offline
I'm not an ACC cheerleader

Posts: 4,657
Joined: Apr 2004
I Root For: Clemson and ECU
Location: midlands of SC
Post: #21
RE: Third Tier rights
(05-15-2012 05:53 PM)ej6687 Wrote:  And, for the record, ESPN put 1 of the 3 game Clemson vs USC series on ESPN3. There are plenty of opportunity to "sell" the other 2 games. If there is that much demand, it's not like a provider isn't going to buy the first 2 games because they aren't getting the final game.

Oh and since we are discussing these teams going to the B12, Texas also had a non-conf baseball game picked up by ESPN3

Only one game of the three game weekend series was at Clemson.

The past two years, and likely for years to come, we play a home and home then one neutral site game over the weekend. Last year's neutral site was at Fluor Field in Greenville, this year's was at Patriot Park in Charleston. I would imagine in the next few years we will play in Fort Mill at Knights Stadium (home of the White Sox AAA affiliate the Charlotte Knights) and in Myrtle Beach at Ticketreturn.com Field (Home of the Rangers High-A affiliate the Myrtle Beach Pelicans) That way fans from all corners of the state get to enjoy the two elite in-state teams in person.
05-15-2012 07:39 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ndlutz Offline
I am the liquor.
*

Posts: 2,541
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 91
I Root For: Pitt
Location: Pittsburgh
Post: #22
RE: Third Tier rights
(05-15-2012 05:47 PM)ej6687 Wrote:  
(05-15-2012 02:52 PM)ndlutz Wrote:  I think catdaddy has a good point, though, about a good baseball game being broadcast on ESPN3 rather than an actual cable network. For a fan, it's obviously a lot better to watch the game on the TV screen. ESPN3 can be pretty crappy (at least in my experience). It would be nice to have a deal where if ESPN isn't going to put the game on their family of networks on actual broadcast TV then the team may do as they please with that game.

Quite frankly, the market is moving towards a more online distribution. Online is a way to provide the product to the people that actually want to watch it. Look at the issues that ESPN and the LHN are having getting cable companies in Texas to buy into the network.

And I've never really had an issue with ESPN3. If the quality is poor, it would be poor regardless of the medium.

While I agree that online streaming is going to be a more common method of distribution in the future, I will say that I have had issues with ESPN3's quality and it would have been significantly better on DirecTV.

I think an interesting prospect for the future is streaming to the TV through devices like AppleTV.
05-15-2012 07:54 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.