"They've lost ground to TAMU in the SEC "

A&M won a Cotton Bowl.....that is it. How has Texas lost ground to A&M? The aggies had a larger recruiting class (the entire SEC oversigns & Texas signed 28 kids the year before so had a very small class this past year) but Texas still had a much better class relative to star average. Don't just listen to message board nonsense, use your mind, read a little, know the facts.....Texas is generations away from losing ground to A&M.

(03-07-2013 07:24 AM)Big 12 Wrote:  "They've lost ground to TAMU in the SEC "

A&M won a Cotton Bowl.....that is it. How has Texas lost ground to A&M? The aggies had a larger recruiting class (the entire SEC oversigns & Texas signed 28 kids the year before so had a very small class this past year) but Texas still had a much better class relative to star average. Don't just listen to message board nonsense, use your mind, read a little, know the facts.....Texas is generations away from losing ground to A&M.

If you don't think the Aggies closed ground and made themselves more attractive, please pull your head out if the sand..

Someone from the B10 always says this before they invite a program. They said it a couple of months before Nebraska was added. And they said this before Rutgers and Maryland were invited. Get ready for a Big 10 announcement within a couple of months, introducing a new school.

(03-07-2013 05:57 AM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  

Good one, dude...

It's funny because here is the same paper with a write up and AD Mark Hollis's picture fronting the article.

http://www.lansingstatejournal.com/artic...ck_check=1

In it the writer directly talks about the conference possibly having two more programs by the time they get their new divisions figured out.

New divisions will be geographical in nature it seems. Splitting the conference in half will not go over well but using geographical pods to get by with two divisions for awhile would be more agreeable to the Presidents I am thinking.