(10-21-2013 10:53 AM)Goldenbuc Wrote:  

(10-21-2013 08:16 AM)uccheese Wrote:  

(10-20-2013 01:41 PM)Knightsweat Wrote:  Wouldn't UCF have to lose twice to lose the tiebreaker with UL? One loss is a tie, which UCF owns, and UL could edge us out by ranking only I believe. Correct me if I'm wrong on this.

99% chance yes. If 3 teams tie at exactly 7-1 UCF could lose the tiebreaker to UL because h2h no longer factored in. Long shot that it would happen though.

UCF, Houston, USF and Rutgers all play each other, so for UCF (for example) there wouldnt be a 3 way tie, if they win out thru the USF game, but lost to SMU. UCF would hold the tie-breaker on everyone.

It could still go to BCS, but even that is probably a lock for UCF. If USF and Cincinnati both win out other than USF losing to UCF.

The Conference is in UCF's hands.

Every game for UCF are all officially trap games...

Rutgers, Houston and especially USF...

FML can we fast forward the games (Except for tailgating) and see who goes to the Orange?!

(10-20-2013 12:33 PM)CalallenStang Wrote:  As of October 20, the following teams control their own destiny for at least a share of the AAC title:

Houston
UCF
USF
Rutgers
SMU

These teams need help:

Louisville
Cincinnati
UConn
Memphis
Temple

At the beginning of the season, did anybody in here honestly believe that list above would look exactly like it does at this point?

I'd say UConn, Temple and Memphis need more than help, they 'd need a miracle. Crazier things can happen in college ball, though.