(12-17-2013 05:23 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  Animals cannot consent to sex with a human, so no. Inbreeding can affect an innocent person with birth defects and genetic diseases, so no. It is silly try to equate these with homosexual or polygamous relationships.

I think that generally sums up my view also.

(12-17-2013 05:29 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  It's the same f*cking thing

Um, no. It's not.

And what does your Bible say about a guy banging his girlfriend?

(12-17-2013 05:01 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(12-17-2013 04:57 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  Inbreeding...no, it leads to birth defects and deleterious traits caused by homozygosity.

bestiality not "beastiality" is illegal since animals cannot consent to sex.

what odd questions.

Well shoot. I misspelled something for once. Anyways. Two consenting adults, a brother and sister, whats the problem? Animals can consent to sex.

I am interested to know how an animal can consent to sex.

I do not support either.

I would not fight to make inbreeding illegal as it is an consensual act among adults. If it were illegal, however, it would be way way way way way way down at the bottom of list of legislative priorities.

Beastiality is not a consensual act though, and as such I'm fine with it being illegal.

(12-17-2013 05:29 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(12-17-2013 05:23 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  Animals cannot consent to sex with a human, so no. Inbreeding can affect an innocent person with birth defects and genetic diseases, so no. It is silly try to equate these with homosexual or polygamous relationships.

It's the same f*cking thing, don't try to excuse the disgusting behavior of homosexualism. I'm throwing out the exact same excuse they throw out, yet yall think it's wrong for a brother/sister, and not for a boy/boy... Talk about f*cked in the head.

Ever hear the story of the dude that was trying to have sex with his mare? She was trying to get more out of him and backed into his wang, crushing him between her butt and the wall of the stable. He died. In brief, if the horse wasn't consenting, she would have kicked him or walked away.

Face it, homosexualism is no different than two related people or a man and animal.

Generally, agree with what BleedsHuskieRed says. I do not think consenting relationship between adult siblings or close relatives should be illegal so long as offspring are not produced from the union. Legally/constitutionally, I don't see much basis to prohibit it. With contraceptives that's possible now. Regardless of how I feel morally/personally about polygamy, adult incest (without offspring), or homosexually, as long as the behavior is in private by consenting adults, then it is none of my business or the governments. If someone is not harming me, my rights, or my property, then I have no reason to limit their behavior.

Wow...this thread...um what?

I voted for beastility b/c I believe in freedom and b/c I want to stay PC as I know a bunch of barners and gumps post here

Where are the libertarians to chime in with something like:

"I don't agree with it, but it should be a Constitutional right to fall in love with a horse."

I dont think you should be able to marry but you should be able to have sex with any animal that you own. Now peta may not like that you will have to check with them. Stossel is on Bill O right now.

(12-17-2013 08:35 PM)WPDAWG08 Wrote:  I dont think you should be able to marry but you should be able to have sex with any animal that you own. Now peta may not like that you will have to check with them. Stossel is on Bill O right now.

I'm going to give you a pass on that insanity because I was thinking about something you did the other day and started laughing out loud.

Ghost apologizing to Occupy
The Pooplander

ha ha ha ha classic.

The pooplander was a great profile but it got taken out too quick. I know it is sick but there are plenty of people that live in seclusion/BFE that enjoy having sex with animals. If they are theirs and in the privacy of their own property and not around children I do not see the issue.

Neither. Is this a serious poll or somebody's idea of a spoof?

(12-17-2013 08:43 PM)WPDAWG08 Wrote:  The pooplander was a great profile but it got taken out too quick. I know it is sick but there are plenty of people that live in seclusion/BFE that enjoy having sex with animals. If they are theirs and in the privacy of their own property and not around children I do not see the issue.

Man, I don't even want to think about it. A story like that happened out in AZ and it was so sick I couldn't watch the news for a week. Some sick guy and a poodle and the dog was in critical condition. Thankfully the guy went to jail and the dog recovered.

The pooplander was better than great. It was probably one off the funniest things to happen over there.

Yeah I guess it depends on the compatibility of the animal. Yeah that is fuckin sick imo.

It just tore them up when we made fun of their site. I love how they never came over yet our posts would always get deleted.

(12-17-2013 08:50 PM)WPDAWG08 Wrote:  Yeah I guess it depends on the compatibility of the animal. Yeah that is fuckin sick imo.

It just tore them up when we made fun of their site. I love how they never came over yet our posts would always get deleted.

good times man. Those dudes deserved it. This site is so much better.

(12-17-2013 08:35 PM)WPDAWG08 Wrote:  I dont think you should be able to marry but you should be able to have sex with any animal that you own. Now peta may not like that you will have to check with them. Stossel is on Bill O right now.

An animal (whether you own it or not) CAN NOT give consent so beastiality should be illegal not to mention it's disgusting...and can spread disease. Think about what animals do, lick, bite, role in, and you want to bang that?

someone who thinks it should be ok to have sex with an animal you own is probably a pretty crappy animal owner.

(12-17-2013 09:04 PM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  

(12-17-2013 08:35 PM)WPDAWG08 Wrote:  I dont think you should be able to marry but you should be able to have sex with any animal that you own. Now peta may not like that you will have to check with them. Stossel is on Bill O right now.

An animal (whether you own it or not) CAN NOT give consent so beastiality should be illegal not to mention it's disgusting...and can spread disease. Think about what animals do, lick, bite, role in, and you want to bang that?

someone who thinks it should be ok to have sex with an animal you own is probably a pretty crappy animal owner.

I think he was joking in a sarcastic manner. Read what I posted prior to his comment.

I think cattle and other ungulates would be fair game due to their size, but yeah I agree domestic pets would be a bit much.

A guy in Memphis was arrested a year or two ago for letting a dog **** him....more than once. The dog obviously liked and consented.

Yeah if you are receiving there should be no arguments about consent imo