Dawg87
Bench Warmer
Posts: 123
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation: 9
I Root For: LA Tech
Location:
|
CUSA, AAC, and SBC make your best Conference of 20!
I know this about to stir up a hornets nest, but after reading a few threads today it can't be much worse. I've read so many comparison theories today between AAC, CUSA and Sunbelt. Honestly, as of today the AAC has a pretty big gap on us but many of us have shared a conference at some point in time with schools in all 3 conferences. Of the 3 conferences who would be your top 20 teams if you could form one super conference together? Just for kicks figure that no one will be picked off in realignment and your are trying to make your best long term conference to compete.
Personally I like this line up:
From CUSA:
Rice
LA Tech
USM
Marshall
MTU
ODU
WKU
UNT
UTSA
From SBC:
Ark State
ULL
From AAC:
ECU
UH
UCF
Cincy
UCONN
Tulsa
Tulane
Memphis
SMU
(This post was last modified: 05-12-2014 01:57 PM by Dawg87.)
|
|
05-12-2014 01:53 PM |
|
Saint Greg
Heisman
Posts: 5,111
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 133
I Root For: Louisiana Tech
Location:
|
RE: CUSA, AAC, and SBC make your best Conference of 20!
no
|
|
05-12-2014 02:04 PM |
|
WhyIsTheRumGone
Bench Warmer
Posts: 211
Joined: Mar 2014
Reputation: 13
I Root For: ECU
Location:
|
RE: CUSA, AAC, and SBC make your best Conference of 20!
|
|
05-12-2014 02:10 PM |
|
Dracorex
Heisman
Posts: 5,051
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 68
I Root For: UAB
Location:
|
RE: CUSA, AAC, and SBC make your best Conference of 20!
You only have 33 posts but we don't do realignment threads on the main boards... they have a separate forum for this crap. It is in the lounge tab.
(This post was last modified: 05-12-2014 02:15 PM by Dracorex.)
|
|
05-12-2014 02:15 PM |
|
uccheese
1st String
Posts: 1,888
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 20
I Root For: Bearcats
Location:
|
RE: CUSA, AAC, and SBC make your best Conference of 20!
You need to at least include a reason why anyone in the AAC would prefer this.
|
|
05-12-2014 02:30 PM |
|
StillJonesing
Hall of Famer
Posts: 15,042
Joined: May 2005
Reputation: 88
I Root For: ECU
Location:
|
RE: CUSA, AAC, and SBC make your best Conference of 20!
Who wants 20. 12 is the optimum number.
UConn
Cincy
UCF
ECU
USF
Tulsa
Houston
SMU
Tulane
Temple
Navy
That looks about perfect. The only one I'd consider changing is Tulane and they just went to a bowl and got a brand new stadium being built.
|
|
05-12-2014 02:32 PM |
|
Dawg87
Bench Warmer
Posts: 123
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation: 9
I Root For: LA Tech
Location:
|
RE: CUSA, AAC, and SBC make your best Conference of 20!
Ouch! I guess this just needed to stay in my head LOL
Never said anyone in the AAC would prefer this, just me I reckon!
|
|
05-12-2014 02:36 PM |
|
BruceMcF
Hall of Famer
Posts: 13,220
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 789
I Root For: Reds/Buckeyes/.
Location:
|
RE: CUSA, AAC, and SBC make your best Conference of 20!
This is the same as asking which are your best conference of 20 from CUSA and SBC, since none of the AAC schools would be willing to play.
But if CUSA wanted a conference of 20, they could have just invited up enough SBC schools that the SBC ceased to be viable as an FBS conference, a la the WAC.
So we know that the CUSA schools don't want to play either.
Given the premise, it's:
All of the AAC, including Navy FB-only.
The three best schools from the SBC
The five best schools from CUSA
|
|
05-12-2014 02:36 PM |
|
HuskyU
Big East Overlord
Posts: 22,802
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 1182
I Root For: UCONN
Location: The Big East
|
RE: CUSA, AAC, and SBC make your best Conference of 20!
(05-12-2014 02:36 PM)BruceMcF Wrote: This is the same as asking which are your best conference of 20 from CUSA and SBC, since none of the AAC schools would be willing to play.
But if CUSA wanted a conference of 20, they could have just invited up enough SBC schools that the SBC ceased to be viable as an FBS conference, a la the WAC.
So we know that the CUSA schools don't want to play either.
Given the premise, it's:
All of the AAC, including Navy FB-only.
The three best schools from the SBC
The five best schools from CUSA
Most of the best AAC expansion targets currently reside in the Mountain/Pacific time zones.
|
|
05-12-2014 02:41 PM |
|
gulfcoastgal
All American
Posts: 4,299
Joined: Feb 2007
Reputation: 400
I Root For: Memphis Tigers
Location:
|
RE: CUSA, AAC, and SBC make your best Conference of 20!
If the "money grab" is as inevitable as it seems, it makes some sense to take the schools with the largest budgets and call it a day.
|
|
05-12-2014 02:47 PM |
|
NBPirate
Heisman
Posts: 9,704
Joined: May 2011
Reputation: 188
I Root For: Georgetown
Location: The Hilltop
|
RE: CUSA, AAC, and SBC make your best Conference of 20!
(05-12-2014 02:36 PM)BruceMcF Wrote: This is the same as asking which are your best conference of 20 from CUSA and SBC, since none of the AAC schools would be willing to play.
But if CUSA wanted a conference of 20, they could have just invited up enough SBC schools that the SBC ceased to be viable as an FBS conference, a la the WAC.
So we know that the CUSA schools don't want to play either.
Given the premise, it's:
All of the AAC, including Navy FB-only.
The three best schools from the SBC
The five best schools from CUSA
We're not inviting anyone from those conferences as long as we don't lose anyone.
Our expansion targets are small in number and have some star power (BYU, Boise, SDSU)
|
|
05-12-2014 02:51 PM |
|
1845 Bear
Moderator
Posts: 5,161
Joined: Aug 2010
Reputation: 187
I Root For: Baylor
Location:
|
RE: CUSA, AAC, and SBC make your best Conference of 20!
So the AAC and the best 10 of the others to make travel and competition work?
TEXAS QUAD
Rice
UNT
UTSA
SMU
UH
SOUTH QUAD
Tulane
USM
Memphis
ArkSt
Tulsa
Coast Quad
UCF
USF
ECU
ODU
Charlotte
East Quad
Cincy
UConn
Temple
Navy (FB ONLY- Find a decent hoops option without FB)
Army (FB ONLY- Find a decent hoops option without FB)
(This post was last modified: 05-12-2014 03:10 PM by 1845 Bear.)
|
|
05-12-2014 03:02 PM |
|
UTEPDallas
Heisman
Posts: 6,024
Joined: Oct 2004
Reputation: 339
I Root For: UTEP/Penn State
Location: Dallas, TX
|
RE: CUSA, AAC, and SBC make your best Conference of 20!
(05-12-2014 02:51 PM)NBPirate Wrote: (05-12-2014 02:36 PM)BruceMcF Wrote: This is the same as asking which are your best conference of 20 from CUSA and SBC, since none of the AAC schools would be willing to play.
But if CUSA wanted a conference of 20, they could have just invited up enough SBC schools that the SBC ceased to be viable as an FBS conference, a la the WAC.
So we know that the CUSA schools don't want to play either.
Given the premise, it's:
All of the AAC, including Navy FB-only.
The three best schools from the SBC
The five best schools from CUSA
We're not inviting anyone from those conferences as long as we don't lose anyone.
Our expansion targets are small in number and have some star power (BYU, Boise, SDSU)
Why those 3? Didn't you guys learn from past experiences? BYU is a big no since they would rather be independent and play a national schedule than joining a G5 conference. The main reasons? Utah and the LDS Church. I can see Utah and BYU fans comparing schedules.
BYU fan: "We have ECU, Temple, SMU, Tulane, South Florida and Memphis coming to Provo for conference games"
Utah fan: "Oh that's cute. We have USC, Oregon, Arizona State, Washington, Stanford and Colorado at home"
If BYU ever joins a conference would be the MWC but even then they have home and home series with several MWC school in the future that it makes no sense to join said conference. The LDS Church has made it clear they want to play a national schedule for exposure purposes. So BYU is a non starter.
Boise already decomitted from joining the Big East/AAC and if it's forced to pay the $5 million exit fee, they won't be interested at all. San Diego State is not worth enough for being the only Western school in an Eastern based conference. Fresno, Colorado State, UNLV and especially Air Force have been on record they're not interested. The only choices the AAC has once it loses members it's from C-USA and UMass. I can see Old Dominion being a good choice down the road.
|
|
05-12-2014 03:06 PM |
|
SVHerd
All American
Posts: 4,177
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 75
I Root For:
Location:
|
RE: CUSA, AAC, and SBC make your best Conference of 20!
(05-12-2014 02:32 PM)StillJonesing Wrote: Who wants 20. 12 is the optimum number.
UConn
Cincy
UCF
ECU
USF
Tulsa
Houston
SMU
Tulane
Temple
Navy
That looks about perfect. The only one I'd consider changing is Tulane and they just went to a bowl and got a brand new stadium being built.
Considering UConn and UC want out the first chance they get, and Tulane and Temple are pitiful in just about every sport, I can see why the AAC is a cluster****.
|
|
05-12-2014 03:20 PM |
|
Attackcoog
Moderator
Posts: 44,874
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 2886
I Root For: Houston
Location:
|
RE: CUSA, AAC, and SBC make your best Conference of 20!
(05-12-2014 03:06 PM)UTEPDallas Wrote: (05-12-2014 02:51 PM)NBPirate Wrote: (05-12-2014 02:36 PM)BruceMcF Wrote: This is the same as asking which are your best conference of 20 from CUSA and SBC, since none of the AAC schools would be willing to play.
But if CUSA wanted a conference of 20, they could have just invited up enough SBC schools that the SBC ceased to be viable as an FBS conference, a la the WAC.
So we know that the CUSA schools don't want to play either.
Given the premise, it's:
All of the AAC, including Navy FB-only.
The three best schools from the SBC
The five best schools from CUSA
We're not inviting anyone from those conferences as long as we don't lose anyone.
Our expansion targets are small in number and have some star power (BYU, Boise, SDSU)
Why those 3? Didn't you guys learn from past experiences? BYU is a big no since they would rather be independent and play a national schedule than joining a G5 conference. The main reasons? Utah and the LDS Church. I can see Utah and BYU fans comparing schedules.
BYU fan: "We have ECU, Temple, SMU, Tulane, South Florida and Memphis coming to Provo for conference games"
Utah fan: "Oh that's cute. We have USC, Oregon, Arizona State, Washington, Stanford and Colorado at home"
If BYU ever joins a conference would be the MWC but even then they have home and home series with several MWC school in the future that it makes no sense to join said conference. The LDS Church has made it clear they want to play a national schedule for exposure purposes. So BYU is a non starter.
Boise already decomitted from joining the Big East/AAC and if it's forced to pay the $5 million exit fee, they won't be interested at all. San Diego State is not worth enough for being the only Western school in an Eastern based conference. Fresno, Colorado State, UNLV and especially Air Force have been on record they're not interested. The only choices the AAC has once it loses members it's from C-USA and UMass. I can see Old Dominion being a good choice down the road.
The biggest problem in the Big East attempt to take western schools was not taking enough to make a viable western division and offering football only memberships (which forced western schools to downgrade thier Olympic sports). If you give 5 MW schools all sports invites you have a nice nationwide conference with some regional rivalries within the pods.
West
SDSU
Fresno
Boise
UNLV
BYU/AF/New Mexico (take one)
Central
Houston
Tulane
SMU
Tulsa
Texas State, ULL, or Arky St
SE
ECU
UCF
USF
Memphis
ODU
North
Cinci
UConn
Navy
Temple
Army or UMass
I think something like this is possible--you can play with the tams a bit--but this is the general idea. Lots of good G5 programs. Lots of markets. Good basketball and football.
(This post was last modified: 05-12-2014 03:38 PM by Attackcoog.)
|
|
05-12-2014 03:21 PM |
|
mlb
O' Great One
Posts: 20,329
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 542
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location:
|
RE: CUSA, AAC, and SBC make your best Conference of 20!
(05-12-2014 03:20 PM)SVHerd Wrote: Considering UConn and UC want out the first chance they get, and Tulane and Temple are pitiful in just about every sport, I can see why the AAC is a cluster****.
And, funny enough, still considered light years above C-USA.
|
|
05-12-2014 03:22 PM |
|
StillJonesing
Hall of Famer
Posts: 15,042
Joined: May 2005
Reputation: 88
I Root For: ECU
Location:
|
RE: CUSA, AAC, and SBC make your best Conference of 20!
(05-12-2014 03:20 PM)SVHerd Wrote: (05-12-2014 02:32 PM)StillJonesing Wrote: Who wants 20. 12 is the optimum number.
UConn
Cincy
UCF
ECU
USF
Tulsa
Houston
SMU
Tulane
Temple
Navy
That looks about perfect. The only one I'd consider changing is Tulane and they just went to a bowl and got a brand new stadium being built.
Considering UConn and UC want out the first chance they get, and Tulane and Temple are pitiful in just about every sport, I can see why the AAC is a cluster****.
I want to bang Scarlett Johanson, doesn't mean it's going to happen. Where are they going? The Big 12 doesn't want them, they didn't even want Louisville. the ACC has 14 teams and a grant of rights until 2027 or so where each team would forfeit hundreds of millions of dollars and all these conference have just negotiated decade long TV deals.
Even if someone suddenly changed their mind and they did leave we'd just grab the best of CUSA if we wanted them. As far as Tulane and Temple still have more money than just about everyone in CUSA. Temple has won bowls and games in the NCAA in the last 3 years too. CUSA doesn't even have a NCAA win the last 3 years between 14 teams.
(This post was last modified: 05-12-2014 03:31 PM by StillJonesing.)
|
|
05-12-2014 03:29 PM |
|
Attackcoog
Moderator
Posts: 44,874
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 2886
I Root For: Houston
Location:
|
RE: CUSA, AAC, and SBC make your best Conference of 20!
(05-12-2014 03:20 PM)SVHerd Wrote: (05-12-2014 02:32 PM)StillJonesing Wrote: Who wants 20. 12 is the optimum number.
UConn
Cincy
UCF
ECU
USF
Tulsa
Houston
SMU
Tulane
Temple
Navy
That looks about perfect. The only one I'd consider changing is Tulane and they just went to a bowl and got a brand new stadium being built.
Considering UConn and UC want out the first chance they get, and Tulane and Temple are pitiful in just about every sport, I can see why the AAC is a cluster****.
lol....You mad bro?
(This post was last modified: 05-12-2014 03:45 PM by Attackcoog.)
|
|
05-12-2014 03:42 PM |
|
UTEPDallas
Heisman
Posts: 6,024
Joined: Oct 2004
Reputation: 339
I Root For: UTEP/Penn State
Location: Dallas, TX
|
RE: CUSA, AAC, and SBC make your best Conference of 20!
(05-12-2014 03:21 PM)Attackcoog Wrote: (05-12-2014 03:06 PM)UTEPDallas Wrote: (05-12-2014 02:51 PM)NBPirate Wrote: (05-12-2014 02:36 PM)BruceMcF Wrote: This is the same as asking which are your best conference of 20 from CUSA and SBC, since none of the AAC schools would be willing to play.
But if CUSA wanted a conference of 20, they could have just invited up enough SBC schools that the SBC ceased to be viable as an FBS conference, a la the WAC.
So we know that the CUSA schools don't want to play either.
Given the premise, it's:
All of the AAC, including Navy FB-only.
The three best schools from the SBC
The five best schools from CUSA
We're not inviting anyone from those conferences as long as we don't lose anyone.
Our expansion targets are small in number and have some star power (BYU, Boise, SDSU)
Why those 3? Didn't you guys learn from past experiences? BYU is a big no since they would rather be independent and play a national schedule than joining a G5 conference. The main reasons? Utah and the LDS Church. I can see Utah and BYU fans comparing schedules.
BYU fan: "We have ECU, Temple, SMU, Tulane, South Florida and Memphis coming to Provo for conference games"
Utah fan: "Oh that's cute. We have USC, Oregon, Arizona State, Washington, Stanford and Colorado at home"
If BYU ever joins a conference would be the MWC but even then they have home and home series with several MWC school in the future that it makes no sense to join said conference. The LDS Church has made it clear they want to play a national schedule for exposure purposes. So BYU is a non starter.
Boise already decomitted from joining the Big East/AAC and if it's forced to pay the $5 million exit fee, they won't be interested at all. San Diego State is not worth enough for being the only Western school in an Eastern based conference. Fresno, Colorado State, UNLV and especially Air Force have been on record they're not interested. The only choices the AAC has once it loses members it's from C-USA and UMass. I can see Old Dominion being a good choice down the road.
The biggest problem in the Big Rast attempt to take western schools was not taking enough to make a viable western division and offering football only memberships (which forced western schools to downgrade thier Olympic sports). If you give 5 MW schools all sports invites you have a nice nationwide conference with some regional rivalries within the pods.
West
SDSU
Fresno
Boise
UNLV
BYU/AF/New Mexico (take one)
Central
Houston
Tulane
SMU
Tulsa
Texas State, ULL, or Arky St
SE
ECU
UCF
USF
Memphis
ODU
North
Cinci
UConn
Navy
Temple
Army or UMass
I think something like this is possible--you can play with the tams a bit--but this is the general idea. Lots of good G5 programs. Lots of markets. Good basketball and football.
The AAC won't raid the MWC. You lost the carrot that made you attractive: a spot in the big boy table. Boise has the best deal in the G5, BYU is a non starter for the reasons I mentioned above, Air Force already said no and the others will not go by themselves. The MWC is set at 12 and is stable for now. The only way they'll expand is if BYU is interested which is very unlikely. #14 is a combo of UTEP, NMSU and Idaho which UTEP would say yes in a NY minute. But without BYU they don't need to expand. The only realistic chances are UMass and C-USA schools.
|
|
05-12-2014 03:46 PM |
|
PirateMarv
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11,508
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation: 191
I Root For: ECU
Location: Chicago and Memphis
|
RE: CUSA, AAC, and SBC make your best Conference of 20!
(05-12-2014 03:46 PM)UTEPDallas Wrote: (05-12-2014 03:21 PM)Attackcoog Wrote: (05-12-2014 03:06 PM)UTEPDallas Wrote: (05-12-2014 02:51 PM)NBPirate Wrote: (05-12-2014 02:36 PM)BruceMcF Wrote: This is the same as asking which are your best conference of 20 from CUSA and SBC, since none of the AAC schools would be willing to play.
But if CUSA wanted a conference of 20, they could have just invited up enough SBC schools that the SBC ceased to be viable as an FBS conference, a la the WAC.
So we know that the CUSA schools don't want to play either.
Given the premise, it's:
All of the AAC, including Navy FB-only.
The three best schools from the SBC
The five best schools from CUSA
We're not inviting anyone from those conferences as long as we don't lose anyone.
Our expansion targets are small in number and have some star power (BYU, Boise, SDSU)
Why those 3? Didn't you guys learn from past experiences? BYU is a big no since they would rather be independent and play a national schedule than joining a G5 conference. The main reasons? Utah and the LDS Church. I can see Utah and BYU fans comparing schedules.
BYU fan: "We have ECU, Temple, SMU, Tulane, South Florida and Memphis coming to Provo for conference games"
Utah fan: "Oh that's cute. We have USC, Oregon, Arizona State, Washington, Stanford and Colorado at home"
If BYU ever joins a conference would be the MWC but even then they have home and home series with several MWC school in the future that it makes no sense to join said conference. The LDS Church has made it clear they want to play a national schedule for exposure purposes. So BYU is a non starter.
Boise already decomitted from joining the Big East/AAC and if it's forced to pay the $5 million exit fee, they won't be interested at all. San Diego State is not worth enough for being the only Western school in an Eastern based conference. Fresno, Colorado State, UNLV and especially Air Force have been on record they're not interested. The only choices the AAC has once it loses members it's from C-USA and UMass. I can see Old Dominion being a good choice down the road.
The biggest problem in the Big Rast attempt to take western schools was not taking enough to make a viable western division and offering football only memberships (which forced western schools to downgrade thier Olympic sports). If you give 5 MW schools all sports invites you have a nice nationwide conference with some regional rivalries within the pods.
West
SDSU
Fresno
Boise
UNLV
BYU/AF/New Mexico (take one)
Central
Houston
Tulane
SMU
Tulsa
Texas State, ULL, or Arky St
SE
ECU
UCF
USF
Memphis
ODU
North
Cinci
UConn
Navy
Temple
Army or UMass
I think something like this is possible--you can play with the tams a bit--but this is the general idea. Lots of good G5 programs. Lots of markets. Good basketball and football.
The AAC won't raid the MWC. You lost the carrot that made you attractive: a spot in the big boy table. Boise has the best deal in the G5, BYU is a non starter for the reasons I mentioned above, Air Force already said no and the others will not go by themselves. The MWC is set at 12 and is stable for now. The only way they'll expand is if BYU is interested which is very unlikely. #14 is a combo of UTEP, NMSU and Idaho which UTEP would say yes in a NY minute. But without BYU they don't need to expand. The only realistic chances are UMass and C-USA schools.
You are forgetting San Diego State. They wanted to stay in the AAC even after Boise State agreed to stay with the MWC and the automatic qualifying tag was removed; but the AAC and SDSU mutually agreed to the split. I am not sure that SDSU would jump at a chance to be in the AAC again especially if BYU came too. I actually believe that the SDSU administration was actually looking to get a full western win formed in the AAC, but other potential MWC did not agree to it.
(This post was last modified: 05-12-2014 03:55 PM by PirateMarv.)
|
|
05-12-2014 03:52 PM |
|