Asked about a Sports Business Journal report that the ACC will pull in $90 to 95 million in bowl revenue this year – it was less than $30 million three years ago — Miami Athletic Director Blake James said, “It’s a huge win for our institution and for our program. It’s the guarantee of knowing that revenue is going to come every year.”
-- pbpost

BOWLING GREEN

Shouldn't it be more than that? If the ACC gets 50 mil base + 6 mil playoffs + 27.5 mil Orange Bowl = 83.5 mil

So you are saying the other 10 bowls are only pulling in 10 million combined???

(12-08-2014 04:37 PM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  Shouldn't it be more than that? If the ACC gets 50 mil base + 6 mil playoffs + 27.5 mil Orange Bowl = 83.5 mil

So you are saying the other 10 bowls are only pulling in 10 million combined???

I'm not saying anything of the sort other than transcribing from an authoritative source ...

I DON'T KNOW WHAT I DON'T KNOW

(12-08-2014 04:37 PM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  Shouldn't it be more than that? If the ACC gets 50 mil base + 6 mil playoffs + 27.5 mil Orange Bowl = 83.5 mil

So you are saying the other 10 bowls are only pulling in 10 million combined???

A little more if you go by this

http://accfootballrx.blogspot.com/2014/1...14-15.html

About $12.75 million.


Side note......I thought that the party line on here from all you ACC "experts" was that the Russell Athletic was going to increase it's payout since it was moving up the ACC food chain and dumping the AAC for the Big XII. Seems that yet again the resident "experts" were wrong, and our best bowl out of the system is indeed a huge downgrade from the Chick-fil-a Bowl of past years.

(12-08-2014 04:44 PM)green Wrote:  

(12-08-2014 04:37 PM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  Shouldn't it be more than that? If the ACC gets 50 mil base + 6 mil playoffs + 27.5 mil Orange Bowl = 83.5 mil

So you are saying the other 10 bowls are only pulling in 10 million combined???

I'm not saying anything of the sort other than transcribing from an authoritative source ...

I DON'T KNOW WHAT I DON'T KNOW

Who is your "authoritative source"?

(12-08-2014 04:53 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(12-08-2014 04:37 PM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  Shouldn't it be more than that? If the ACC gets 50 mil base + 6 mil playoffs + 27.5 mil Orange Bowl = 83.5 mil

So you are saying the other 10 bowls are only pulling in 10 million combined???

A little more if you go by this

http://accfootballrx.blogspot.com/2014/1...14-15.html

About $12.75 million.


Side note......I thought that the party line on here from all you ACC "experts" was that the Russell Athletic was going to increase it's payout since it was moving up the ACC food chain and dumping the AAC for the Big XII. Seems that yet again the resident "experts" were wrong, and our best bowl out of the system is indeed a huge downgrade from the Chick-fil-a Bowl of past years.

The Music City payout from that link should go to the ACC then Notre Dame gets a cut like an ACC program would is how I understood the agreement.

(12-08-2014 04:56 PM)ken d Wrote:  

(12-08-2014 04:44 PM)green Wrote:  

(12-08-2014 04:37 PM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  Shouldn't it be more than that? If the ACC gets 50 mil base + 6 mil playoffs + 27.5 mil Orange Bowl = 83.5 mil

So you are saying the other 10 bowls are only pulling in 10 million combined???

I'm not saying anything of the sort other than transcribing from an authoritative source ...

I DON'T KNOW WHAT I DON'T KNOW

Who is your "authoritative source"?

Sports Business Journal
I guess ...
as an uninvited guest, I missed the press avail ...
sorry ...

SECOND-HAND KNOWLEDGE

(12-08-2014 04:44 PM)green Wrote:  

(12-08-2014 04:37 PM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  Shouldn't it be more than that? If the ACC gets 50 mil base + 6 mil playoffs + 27.5 mil Orange Bowl = 83.5 mil

So you are saying the other 10 bowls are only pulling in 10 million combined???

I'm not saying anything of the sort other than transcribing from an authoritative source ...

I DON'T KNOW WHAT I DON'T KNOW

$83.5 million per year is about $5.6 million per school per year (although you'll have to subtract bowl expenses from that). I wonder what the other conferences will be making.

(12-08-2014 05:05 PM)green Wrote:  

(12-08-2014 04:56 PM)ken d Wrote:  

(12-08-2014 04:44 PM)green Wrote:  

(12-08-2014 04:37 PM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  Shouldn't it be more than that? If the ACC gets 50 mil base + 6 mil playoffs + 27.5 mil Orange Bowl = 83.5 mil

So you are saying the other 10 bowls are only pulling in 10 million combined???

I'm not saying anything of the sort other than transcribing from an authoritative source ...

I DON'T KNOW WHAT I DON'T KNOW

Who is your "authoritative source"?

Sports Business Journal
I guess ...
as an uninvited guest, I missed the press avail ...
sorry ...

SECOND-HAND KNOWLEDGE

It's just that I had never heard of the Sports Business Journal before this thread.

(12-08-2014 05:04 PM)4x4hokies Wrote:  

(12-08-2014 04:53 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(12-08-2014 04:37 PM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  Shouldn't it be more than that? If the ACC gets 50 mil base + 6 mil playoffs + 27.5 mil Orange Bowl = 83.5 mil

So you are saying the other 10 bowls are only pulling in 10 million combined???

A little more if you go by this

http://accfootballrx.blogspot.com/2014/1...14-15.html

About $12.75 million.


Side note......I thought that the party line on here from all you ACC "experts" was that the Russell Athletic was going to increase it's payout since it was moving up the ACC food chain and dumping the AAC for the Big XII. Seems that yet again the resident "experts" were wrong, and our best bowl out of the system is indeed a huge downgrade from the Chick-fil-a Bowl of past years.

The Music City payout from that link should go to the ACC then Notre Dame gets a cut like an ACC program would is how I understood the agreement.

That is correct. I also think some of those bowl payouts are higher. Russell is higher than last year and Belk is paying more to get an SEC team.

(12-08-2014 05:24 PM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  

(12-08-2014 05:04 PM)4x4hokies Wrote:  

(12-08-2014 04:53 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(12-08-2014 04:37 PM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  Shouldn't it be more than that? If the ACC gets 50 mil base + 6 mil playoffs + 27.5 mil Orange Bowl = 83.5 mil

So you are saying the other 10 bowls are only pulling in 10 million combined???

A little more if you go by this

http://accfootballrx.blogspot.com/2014/1...14-15.html

About $12.75 million.


Side note......I thought that the party line on here from all you ACC "experts" was that the Russell Athletic was going to increase it's payout since it was moving up the ACC food chain and dumping the AAC for the Big XII. Seems that yet again the resident "experts" were wrong, and our best bowl out of the system is indeed a huge downgrade from the Chick-fil-a Bowl of past years.

The Music City payout from that link should go to the ACC then Notre Dame gets a cut like an ACC program would is how I understood the agreement.

That is correct. I also think some of those bowl payouts are higher. Russell is higher than last year and Belk is paying more to get an SEC team.

Link?

I'm guessing that puts us at $7m a team (including ACCCG revenue). I'm not sure how much the ACC ball tourney makes or how much the ACC owns in NCAA tourney credits, but I wouldn't be surprised if we were $8-8.5 before TV ($15+?). That was basically the entire BIG EAST payout two years ago.

(12-08-2014 05:30 PM)nzmorange Wrote:  I'm guessing that puts us at $7m a team (including ACCCG revenue). I'm not sure how much the ACC ball tourney makes or how much the ACC owns in NCAA tourney credits, but I wouldn't be surprised if we were $8-8.5 before TV ($15+?). That was basically the entire BIG EAST payout two years ago.

We have yet to earn any NCAA credits for the ACC yet we will earn an equal share this year. Numbers should go up through the years, substantially.

(12-08-2014 05:26 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(12-08-2014 05:24 PM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  

(12-08-2014 05:04 PM)4x4hokies Wrote:  

(12-08-2014 04:53 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(12-08-2014 04:37 PM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  Shouldn't it be more than that? If the ACC gets 50 mil base + 6 mil playoffs + 27.5 mil Orange Bowl = 83.5 mil

So you are saying the other 10 bowls are only pulling in 10 million combined???

A little more if you go by this

http://accfootballrx.blogspot.com/2014/1...14-15.html

About $12.75 million.


Side note......I thought that the party line on here from all you ACC "experts" was that the Russell Athletic was going to increase it's payout since it was moving up the ACC food chain and dumping the AAC for the Big XII. Seems that yet again the resident "experts" were wrong, and our best bowl out of the system is indeed a huge downgrade from the Chick-fil-a Bowl of past years.

The Music City payout from that link should go to the ACC then Notre Dame gets a cut like an ACC program would is how I understood the agreement.

That is correct. I also think some of those bowl payouts are higher. Russell is higher than last year and Belk is paying more to get an SEC team.

Link?

No links my friend. No one will publish the amounts. Just read between the lines.

(12-08-2014 05:52 PM)Dasville Wrote:  

(12-08-2014 05:30 PM)nzmorange Wrote:  I'm guessing that puts us at $7m a team (including ACCCG revenue). I'm not sure how much the ACC ball tourney makes or how much the ACC owns in NCAA tourney credits, but I wouldn't be surprised if we were $8-8.5 before TV ($15+?). That was basically the entire BIG EAST payout two years ago.

We have yet to earn any NCAA credits for the ACC yet we will earn an equal share this year. Numbers should go up through the years, substantially.

I'm talking about everyone else. However, what you say is partially applicable to SU, Pitt, and possibly ND.

(12-08-2014 05:59 PM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  

(12-08-2014 05:26 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(12-08-2014 05:24 PM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  

(12-08-2014 05:04 PM)4x4hokies Wrote:  

(12-08-2014 04:53 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  A little more if you go by this

http://accfootballrx.blogspot.com/2014/1...14-15.html

About $12.75 million.


Side note......I thought that the party line on here from all you ACC "experts" was that the Russell Athletic was going to increase it's payout since it was moving up the ACC food chain and dumping the AAC for the Big XII. Seems that yet again the resident "experts" were wrong, and our best bowl out of the system is indeed a huge downgrade from the Chick-fil-a Bowl of past years.

The Music City payout from that link should go to the ACC then Notre Dame gets a cut like an ACC program would is how I understood the agreement.

That is correct. I also think some of those bowl payouts are higher. Russell is higher than last year and Belk is paying more to get an SEC team.

Link?

No links my friend. No one will publish the amounts. Just read between the lines.

In other words you just pulled it out your rectal cavity.

We are talking about the conference who would issue a press release stating Swofford cut a good fart if they thought it would make them look even slightly good. If the payouts were increased there would have been press releases, tweets, billboards, and sign twirlers bragging about the increase. "Read between the lines"?

does anyone know if all the school's met the NCAA required APR ? If they all met the APR, that's another 3,300,000 for the ACC.

As part of the base payout, each conference will receive $300,000 for each school that meets the NCAA's required APR for participation in a bowl game. (For example, if 10 teams met the requirement, a conference would receive $3 million.)

(12-08-2014 06:09 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(12-08-2014 05:59 PM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  

(12-08-2014 05:26 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(12-08-2014 05:24 PM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  

(12-08-2014 05:04 PM)4x4hokies Wrote:  The Music City payout from that link should go to the ACC then Notre Dame gets a cut like an ACC program would is how I understood the agreement.

That is correct. I also think some of those bowl payouts are higher. Russell is higher than last year and Belk is paying more to get an SEC team.

Link?

No links my friend. No one will publish the amounts. Just read between the lines.

In other words you just pulled it out your rectal cavity.

We are talking about the conference who would issue a press release stating Swofford cut a good fart if they thought it would make them look even slightly good. If the payouts were increased there would have been press releases, tweets, billboards, and sign twirlers bragging about the increase. "Read between the lines"?

Uh no. You know good and well the SEC isn't taking a pay cut for anyone so how in the world did the Belk get them?

Second: http://espn.go.com/college-football/stor...ources-say

Just read between the lines. Russell isn't jumping that far unless they're paying for it..also against a Big 12 team.

Finally has anyone release their payouts? Everybody is keeping it close to the vest

(12-08-2014 06:10 PM)Cardsfan1974 Wrote:  does anyone know if all the school's met the NCAA required APR ? If they all met the APR, that's another 3,300,000 for the ACC.

As part of the base payout, each conference will receive $300,000 for each school that meets the NCAA's required APR for participation in a bowl game. (For example, if 10 teams met the requirement, a conference would receive $3 million.)

Know any good articles on that? I'd like to read up a little.

(12-08-2014 06:22 PM)Marge Schott Wrote:  

(12-08-2014 06:10 PM)Cardsfan1974 Wrote:  does anyone know if all the school's met the NCAA required APR ? If they all met the APR, that's another 3,300,000 for the ACC.

As part of the base payout, each conference will receive $300,000 for each school that meets the NCAA's required APR for participation in a bowl game. (For example, if 10 teams met the requirement, a conference would receive $3 million.)

Know any good articles on that? I'd like to read up a little.

I can help with that one:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nca.../12734897/

"— As part of the base payout, each conference will receive $300,000 for each school that meets the NCAA's required APR for participation in a bowl game. (For example, if 10 teams met the requirement, a conference would receive $3 million.)"