Tyler Boyd had the game-winner in his hands and dropped it... then a 4th incompletion.

Wow!

So, I go out to dinner with Pitt leading 34-13 in the 4th only to see and read they lost in a Pitt-like fashion. Unbelievable. 21 points in a little over 3 minutes left in the game, 2 recovered onside kicks, odds were less than 1%. Pitt has some hex on it.

(01-02-2015 06:03 PM)IberianPanther Wrote:  So, I go out to dinner with Pitt leading 34-13 in the 4th only to see and read they lost in a Pitt-like fashion. Unbelievable. 21 points in a little over 3 minutes left in the game, 2 recovered onside kicks, odds were less than 1%. Pitt has some hex on it.

So it was your fault!

Fortunately only AAC trolls will remember this game 3 weeks from now.

(01-02-2015 02:41 PM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  Pitt 31, Houston 6.
I'm calling this one a win for Pitt

lmao

ODU should have joined the ACC.

(01-02-2015 07:22 PM)Ralphus Wrote:  ODU should have joined the ACC.

Bartender - I'll have what he's havin'.

(01-02-2015 02:41 PM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  Pitt 31, Houston 6.
I'm calling this one a win for Pitt

a bit premature.

What a joke. Up 21 with four minutes left in the game against a mediocre AAC team and you manage to lose in regulation. To give an idea on the "strength" of Houston, try #75 in the Massey Composite rankings, well below everyone in the AAC other than Cuse and Wake.

I'd say complete lack of leadership but that much is obvious. Hopefully positive change is coming at Pitt.

(01-02-2015 02:41 PM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  Pitt 31, Houston 6.
I'm calling this one a win for Pitt

Just like the networks calling the election for Gore 15 years ago.

(01-02-2015 07:22 PM)Ralphus Wrote:  

(01-02-2015 02:41 PM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  Pitt 31, Houston 6.
I'm calling this one a win for Pitt

lmao

ODU should have joined the ACC.

Is that the same ODU tha played a mediocre UNC last year, and UNC scored 80 points on? Eighty points dude! That's eleven plus touchdowns. Go away please.

(01-02-2015 06:03 PM)IberianPanther Wrote:  So, I go out to dinner with Pitt leading 34-13 in the 4th only to see and read they lost in a Pitt-like fashion. Unbelievable. 21 points in a little over 3 minutes left in the game, 2 recovered onside kicks, odds were less than 1%. Pitt has some hex on it.

Could it be a conspiracy with powerful interests in the SEC and ESPN paying off Boyd and others to make sure the SEC does not end up as the worst of the major conferences in their bowl results?

(01-02-2015 06:03 PM)IberianPanther Wrote:  So, I go out to dinner with Pitt leading 34-13 in the 4th only to see and read they lost in a Pitt-like fashion. Unbelievable. 21 points in a little over 3 minutes left in the game, 2 recovered onside kicks, odds were less than 1%. Pitt has some hex on it.

Could be worse, you could be subjected to watching Lorenzo Charles slam a basketball into a hoop and Jimmy V. run around a court looking for someone to hug to sink your best chance at a national title over and over and over and over [insert infinity symbol].

Is it better to have loved and lost
than to never have loved at all?

(01-04-2015 04:36 PM)_C2_ Wrote:  

(01-02-2015 06:03 PM)IberianPanther Wrote:  So, I go out to dinner with Pitt leading 34-13 in the 4th only to see and read they lost in a Pitt-like fashion. Unbelievable. 21 points in a little over 3 minutes left in the game, 2 recovered onside kicks, odds were less than 1%. Pitt has some hex on it.

Could be worse, you could be subjected to watching Lorenzo Charles slam a basketball into a hoop and Jimmy V. run around a court looking for someone to hug to sink your best chance at a national title over and over and over and over [insert infinity symbol].

Always rooted for Guy Lewis to win an NC. And yes, that was their year.

Cheers,
Neil

(01-04-2015 04:59 PM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  Is it better to have loved and lost
than to never have loved at all?

Most Bills fans say "no."