(03-03-2016 10:21 PM)LaCajunsFan Wrote:  

(03-03-2016 10:13 PM)stodgdog Wrote:  

(03-03-2016 08:37 PM)techdawg88 Wrote:  why can't y'all just ignore LaCajunsFan?

I wish he would go away, but if I make a post he is going to make an ignorant response right away. Plus he's left me about 60 PMs. He also has called my wife and my mother sluts. I don't like that. Plus, he goes to many boards and calls me a liar, but has never told me what he thinks I have lied about, which I haven't. I don't like that either. The guy is insane. He goes by multiple names - "Vermillion White" "geauxpnc" to name a couple in addition to his name du jour.

The only reason I used other names was to try to get posting privileges on the @ruston site. But there about 6 @ruston fans that post on RP, that do not have the same IDs as on the ltu-r site, which yiu always conveniently fail to mention.

I have given, in pm's, irrefutable proof of your numerous lies. Irrefutable. I can post them here, if there is any interest, and with the mod's permission. But I won't hold my breath, lol.

No, you have not. You quote my posts and say I am lying, but you have never said what you think are lies. I have not lied. You disagree with something, so you call it a lie. It doesn't make sense.

(03-04-2016 08:45 AM)LaCajunsFan Wrote:  

(03-04-2016 05:38 AM)BRtransplant Wrote:  Getting back on the subject, I have a question. Does UL-L have to return the trophies for the two New Orleans Bowl wins they had to vacate because Saunders was caught cheating?

FIFY.

Quote:Although the institution had no idea about the former assistant football coach's actions, institutions act through their institutional staffs. The NCAA constitution and bylaws require institutions to be accountable for the actions of their staffs.

The guy was in the employ of ULL at the time, representing ULL at the time. ULL benefited from his fraud (wins, championships, bowl games) and would have continued to benefit if he was not busted by a disgruntled player who you guys have no problem calling a drug dealer without substantiated facts (even though you are demanding that La Tech posters provide substantiated facts about Huds knowledge of events).

NCAA punished ULL for a reason.

(03-04-2016 09:01 AM)FIU4Ever Wrote:  

(03-04-2016 08:45 AM)LaCajunsFan Wrote:  

(03-04-2016 05:38 AM)BRtransplant Wrote:  Getting back on the subject, I have a question. Does UL-L have to return the trophies for the two New Orleans Bowl wins they had to vacate because Saunders was caught cheating?

FIFY.

Quote:Although the institution had no idea about the former assistant football coach's actions, institutions act through their institutional staffs. The NCAA constitution and bylaws require institutions to be accountable for the actions of their staffs.

The guy was in the employ of ULL at the time, representing ULL at the time. ULL benefited from his fraud (wins, championships, bowl games) and would have continued to benefit if he was not busted by a disgruntled player who you guys have no problem calling a drug dealer without substantiated facts (even though you are demanding that La Tech posters provide substantiated facts about Huds knowledge of events).

NCAA punished ULL for a reason.

We agree: we should be, and are being, punished for not being aware that a rogue coach was doing something incorrect.

But you are incorrect in stating this came from a student: the first notification we received from the NCAA was in regards to Saunders 'actions' while at OM. From there we performed our own investigation, realized the issue, informed the NCAA, etc.

Again, here are the words from the findings that paint a very different picture than the one trying to be painted:
terms:

"The panel commends the institution for its level of cooperation in this case. It expended substantial institutional resources to expedite a thorough and fair collection and disclosure of information in the case and the institution's president and athletics compliance director both personally invested substantial time and attention to the details of the investigation.

In short, the institution's exemplary cooperation in this case was a model for the kind of relationship and cooperation member institutions should strive for in the infractions process."

"The case did not involve a failure to monitor or a lack of institutional control. There was also no allegation that the head coach lacked control in this case"

(03-03-2016 11:53 PM)PirateTreasureNC Wrote:  And they still won't bust UNC....

Yep, NCAA must be getting really pissed at Chapel Hill now seeing as how they smacked ULL.

So according to the Cajun posting in this thread, ULL really didn't cheat and the 22 games and bowl games they had to vacate they really did win legally and this is all a Tech propaganda campaign that Tech successfully pulled off by getting Sanders a job at ULL. Got it. Nice job Tech. I am impressed. Those Halo's must be getting heavy though in Laffayette.

(03-04-2016 09:01 AM)FIU4Ever Wrote:  

(03-04-2016 08:45 AM)LaCajunsFan Wrote:  

(03-04-2016 05:38 AM)BRtransplant Wrote:  Getting back on the subject, I have a question. Does UL-L have to return the trophies for the two New Orleans Bowl wins they had to vacate because Saunders was caught cheating?

FIFY.

Quote:Although the institution had no idea about the former assistant football coach's actions, institutions act through their institutional staffs. The NCAA constitution and bylaws require institutions to be accountable for the actions of their staffs.

The guy was in the employ of ULL at the time, representing ULL at the time. ULL benefited from his fraud (wins, championships, bowl games) and would have continued to benefit if he was not busted by a disgruntled player who you guys have no problem calling a drug dealer without substantiated facts (even though you are demanding that La Tech posters provide substantiated facts about Huds knowledge of events).

NCAA punished ULL for a reason.

Unless Saunders testifies, all the facts will never be known

(03-04-2016 11:15 AM)stodgdog Wrote:  

(03-04-2016 09:01 AM)FIU4Ever Wrote:  

(03-04-2016 08:45 AM)LaCajunsFan Wrote:  

(03-04-2016 05:38 AM)BRtransplant Wrote:  Getting back on the subject, I have a question. Does UL-L have to return the trophies for the two New Orleans Bowl wins they had to vacate because Saunders was caught cheating?

FIFY.

Quote:Although the institution had no idea about the former assistant football coach's actions, institutions act through their institutional staffs. The NCAA constitution and bylaws require institutions to be accountable for the actions of their staffs.

The guy was in the employ of ULL at the time, representing ULL at the time. ULL benefited from his fraud (wins, championships, bowl games) and would have continued to benefit if he was not busted by a disgruntled player who you guys have no problem calling a drug dealer without substantiated facts (even though you are demanding that La Tech posters provide substantiated facts about Huds knowledge of events).

NCAA punished ULL for a reason.

Unless Saunders testifies, all the facts will never be known

Well, that is your opinion. But apparently the NCAA disagrees with you or they would not have declared their belief that neither the admin or Hud had any direct involvement in the infraction. And they based their statements on facts. Not opinions.

(03-04-2016 11:13 AM)usmbacker Wrote:  So according to the Cajun posting in this thread, ULL really didn't cheat and the 22 games and bowl games they had to vacate they really did win legally and this is all a Tech propaganda campaign that Tech successfully pulled off by getting Sanders a job at ULL. Got it. Nice job Tech. I am impressed. Those Halo's must be getting heavy though in Laffayette.

If I am reading the cajun postings correctly, you are spot on with your summary. For 22 games there were ULL recruits, now the **** hit the fan they are Sanders recruits.

(03-03-2016 11:15 PM)techdawg88 Wrote:  

(03-03-2016 11:13 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(03-03-2016 11:09 PM)techdawg88 Wrote:  

(03-03-2016 10:58 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(03-03-2016 10:53 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  LaCajunFan gave me neg rep around 10:30pm a few days ago. I went to his profile and it said "viewing stogdog profile"

I've already told LaCajunFan that Stogdog doesn't play for the other team but he still follows Stogdog around and views his profile late into the night.

If true... That is over the top....you guys really need to take advantage of the "ignore" feature... I did with WKUSquirtGun and the board was so much more tolerable....plus, I recovered lost brain cells from listening to the Internet equivalent of monosyllabic grunts..

i already told them and they aren't following through

I need to run for the next mod election.... Just kidding guys

I think this guy is CajunFantico because as soon as that poster disappeared this joker took his spot doing the same s***

I noticed the same thing and considering this poster's relatively low post count I believe you are on to something.

(03-04-2016 12:26 PM)FIU4Ever Wrote:  

(03-04-2016 11:13 AM)usmbacker Wrote:  So according to the Cajun posting in this thread, ULL really didn't cheat and the 22 games and bowl games they had to vacate they really did win legally and this is all a Tech propaganda campaign that Tech successfully pulled off by getting Sanders a job at ULL. Got it. Nice job Tech. I am impressed. Those Halo's must be getting heavy though in Laffayette.

If I am reading the cajun postings correctly, you are spot on with your summary. For 22 games there were ULL recruits, now the **** hit the fan they are Sanders recruits.

Wrong. Saunders cheated, but since we were ultimately responsible for his actions the sanctions levied against us are valid. But the point I was trying to make is that both the admin and Hud were cleared of being directly involved in the infractions. And in fact the NCAA went out of their way to give us kudos for how we handled everything.

(03-04-2016 01:03 PM)usm99 Wrote:  

(03-03-2016 11:15 PM)techdawg88 Wrote:  I think this guy is CajunFantico because as soon as that poster disappeared this joker took his spot doing the same s***

I noticed the same thing and considering this poster's relatively low post count I believe you are on to something.

Lol...I will share this with him on RP. I have no doubt he will find that as humorous as I do.

(03-04-2016 02:17 PM)LaCajunsFan Wrote:  

(03-04-2016 12:26 PM)FIU4Ever Wrote:  

(03-04-2016 11:13 AM)usmbacker Wrote:  So according to the Cajun posting in this thread, ULL really didn't cheat and the 22 games and bowl games they had to vacate they really did win legally and this is all a Tech propaganda campaign that Tech successfully pulled off by getting Sanders a job at ULL. Got it. Nice job Tech. I am impressed. Those Halo's must be getting heavy though in Laffayette.

If I am reading the cajun postings correctly, you are spot on with your summary. For 22 games there were ULL recruits, now the **** hit the fan they are Sanders recruits.

Wrong. Saunders cheated, but since we were ultimately responsible for his actions the sanctions levied against us are valid. But the point I was trying to make is that both the admin and Hud were cleared of being directly involved in the infractions. And in fact the NCAA went out of their way to give us kudos for how we handled everything.

ULL's asst. coach cheated.

(03-04-2016 09:01 AM)FIU4Ever Wrote:  

(03-04-2016 08:45 AM)LaCajunsFan Wrote:  

(03-04-2016 05:38 AM)BRtransplant Wrote:  Getting back on the subject, I have a question. Does UL-L have to return the trophies for the two New Orleans Bowl wins they had to vacate because Saunders was caught cheating?

FIFY.

Quote:Although the institution had no idea about the former assistant football coach's actions, institutions act through their institutional staffs. The NCAA constitution and bylaws require institutions to be accountable for the actions of their staffs.

The guy was in the employ of ULL at the time, representing ULL at the time. ULL benefited from his fraud (wins, championships, bowl games) and would have continued to benefit if he was not busted by a disgruntled player who you guys have no problem calling a drug dealer without substantiated facts (even though you are demanding that La Tech posters provide substantiated facts about Huds knowledge of events).

NCAA punished ULL for a reason.

All true. But the NCAA also cleared them of several things as well. It was a Tech fan that claimed it doesn't matter what the NCAA cleared them of...still guilty.

The guy is just defending his school.

(03-04-2016 12:26 PM)FIU4Ever Wrote:  

(03-04-2016 11:13 AM)usmbacker Wrote:  So according to the Cajun posting in this thread, ULL really didn't cheat and the 22 games and bowl games they had to vacate they really did win legally and this is all a Tech propaganda campaign that Tech successfully pulled off by getting Sanders a job at ULL. Got it. Nice job Tech. I am impressed. Those Halo's must be getting heavy though in Laffayette.

If I am reading the cajun postings correctly, you are spot on with your summary. For 22 games there were ULL recruits, now the **** hit the fan they are Sanders recruits.

As you pointed out, Tech had absolutely nothing to do with this. The @ Lafayette folks say that their administration was "exonerated" of any wrong doing. That isn't exactly what they said. They said there was no evidence that others were knowing of Saunders actions. Of course there wasn't as Saunders didn't testify and he is the only one who knows exactly what happened. I never said that others were guilty of anything. What I said was that without Saunders testimony the whole truth is unknown. That is obvious and why this Cajun guy says otherwise makes no sense. Of course the @ Lafayette administration cooperated in the investigation. They were caught with their hand in the cookie jar. That is why I would be real careful what I wish for were I the Cajuns. If Saunders testifies to his activities at Ole Miss and how that testimony would entail his activities at other schools is unknown. Watch out for what you wish for as you just might get it.

(03-03-2016 10:31 PM)LaCajunsFan Wrote:  I make it my mission to call out his lies whenever and wherever I can. It's called freedom of speech.

Freedom of speech does not include you calling me a liar when I have not lied. Freedom of speech does include my right to have an opinion, whether you agree with my opinion or not. I still do not know what you claim me to have lied about as you will not answer that question. Why don't you, in your words, tell me exactly what you consider to be a lie that I have committed? Also, why do you accuse me of attacking your family when I have never mentioned them? Why don't you explain why you have attacked my family, including calling my wife and my mother sluts? Your own people on RP have asked you why you would do such a thing, but you never answered them.

(03-04-2016 06:39 PM)stodgdog Wrote:  

(03-03-2016 10:31 PM)LaCajunsFan Wrote:  I make it my mission to call out his lies whenever and wherever I can. It's called freedom of speech.

Freedom of speech does not include you calling me a liar when I have not lied. Freedom of speech does include my right to have an opinion, whether you agree with my opinion or not. I still do not know what you claim me to have lied about as you will not answer that question. Why don't you, in your words, tell me exactly what you consider to be a lie that I have committed? Also, why do you accuse me of attacking your family when I have never mentioned them? Why don't you explain why you have attacked my family, including calling my wife and my mother sluts? Your own people on RP have asked you why you would do such a thing, but you never answered them.

I outlined several of your lies via pm. I have also addressed each of the other 'concerns' you listed. LOL....and this is also addressed in the current thread in the smack file.

But if you want to have anither thread dedicated to soley this issue I have no problem with that. Get the mods permission to do so and off we will go. I won't comment further since I don't want to further detail this thread, or do anything else that the mods might not agree with.

"I think this guy is CajunFantico" - TD88

No, I don't think so. LaCajun_fan does use other names for some reason. He at one time posted on this site under the name "Vermillion White" and left a number of people messages through the rep thing on BBB under that name. He also posted many times on BBB under the name "geauxpnc." Why he keeps changing names I do not know.

I never visited this site until we were members of CUSA. I would bet that CF and LCF never did either until we were selected to be CUSA members. Their sole reason for visiting and posting on this site seems to be to criticize Tech or dispute any post a Tech poster makes. Of course, Tech was selected to join the WAC and CUSA over @ Lafayette, so as 2 time losers at the hand of Tech, their jealousy is understandable. Defeating them handily in FB, Mens and Womens Basketball, and Baseball, further fuels their hatred. They know that CUSA is a much superior conference to the SBC. Their only defense is to unduly criticize Tech and CUSA. Of course, they criticize their own conference and their conference mates, especially ULM, who they cajoled into helping them change their name from USL to ULL. Now, they try to distance themselves from that agreement by attempting to claim UL as their "rightful" name.

(03-04-2016 06:55 PM)LaCajunsFan Wrote:  

(03-04-2016 06:39 PM)stodgdog Wrote:  

(03-03-2016 10:31 PM)LaCajunsFan Wrote:  I make it my mission to call out his lies whenever and wherever I can. It's called freedom of speech.

Freedom of speech does not include you calling me a liar when I have not lied. Freedom of speech does include my right to have an opinion, whether you agree with my opinion or not. I still do not know what you claim me to have lied about as you will not answer that question. Why don't you, in your words, tell me exactly what you consider to be a lie that I have committed? Also, why do you accuse me of attacking your family when I have never mentioned them? Why don't you explain why you have attacked my family, including calling my wife and my mother sluts? Your own people on RP have asked you why you would do such a thing, but you never answered them.

I outlined several of your lies via pm. I have also addressed each of the other 'concerns' you listed. LOL....and this is also addressed in the current thread in the smack file.

But if you want to have anither thread dedicated to soley this issue I have no problem with that. Get the mods permission to do so and off we will go. I won't comment further since I don't want to further detail this thread, or do anything else that the mods might not agree with.

This thread was about the NCAA sanctions against @ Lafayette for academic fraud. YOU derailed it by again calling me a liar on Page 3 of the thread.

No, I have not lied about anything. You should learn your mannerisms. You also should answer the questions asked of you, as I answered your question in the other thread, even though you don't accept my answer as you try to change what I said. Typical.

We could all benefit from learning our mannerisms.

(03-04-2016 06:23 PM)stodgdog Wrote:  

(03-04-2016 12:26 PM)FIU4Ever Wrote:  

(03-04-2016 11:13 AM)usmbacker Wrote:  So according to the Cajun posting in this thread, ULL really didn't cheat and the 22 games and bowl games they had to vacate they really did win legally and this is all a Tech propaganda campaign that Tech successfully pulled off by getting Sanders a job at ULL. Got it. Nice job Tech. I am impressed. Those Halo's must be getting heavy though in Laffayette.

If I am reading the cajun postings correctly, you are spot on with your summary. For 22 games there were ULL recruits, now the **** hit the fan they are Sanders recruits.

As you pointed out, Tech had absolutely nothing to do with this. The @ Lafayette folks say that their administration was "exonerated" of any wrong doing. That isn't exactly what they said. They said there was no evidence that others were knowing of Saunders actions. Of course there wasn't as Saunders didn't testify and he is the only one who knows exactly what happened. I never said that others were guilty of anything. What I said was that without Saunders testimony the whole truth is unknown. That is obvious and why this Cajun guy says otherwise makes no sense. Of course the @ Lafayette administration cooperated in the investigation. They were caught with their hand in the cookie jar. That is why I would be real careful what I wish for were I the Cajuns. If Saunders testifies to his activities at Ole Miss and how that testimony would entail his activities at other schools is unknown. Watch out for what you wish for as you just might get it.

Yep, ULL is scared, very scared this might happen.