(08-09-2016 03:47 PM)dbackjon Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 03:34 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  MSM is hell bent on grabbing and twisting anything Trump says into anything under the sun.

No, it is the blind Trump supporters that are doing the mental gymnastics to try to justify voting for a mentally unstable, treasonous, bad businessman, racist fool

(08-09-2016 03:36 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  So desperate that one has to try to make up what a man says.

As a wise man once told me, if you are hearing dog whistles then you are the dog.

(08-09-2016 03:48 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 03:36 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  So desperate that one has to try to make up what a man says.

As a wise man once told me, if you are hearing dog whistles then you are the dog.

+3

To that! Case closed.

/thread

(08-09-2016 03:38 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 03:33 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 03:28 PM)solohawks Wrote:  This was in my hometown so i watched it while i was at work. He was stating that if Clinton won the election and got to pick the supreme court justices the 2nd amendment would be dead and there is nothing anyone could do about it. He then said that there might be something the 2nd amendment folks could do about it, obviously making a play on how people with guns could stand up for themselves if someone tried to take away their gun.

Absolutely in no way shape or form did he call for someone to assassinate Clinton. To suggest otherwise is fundatmentally dishonest.

I stand by my comments. There is no reason to invoke "The Second Amendment" as a way to stop a President from exercising his/her constitutional duties.

Total dog whistle... http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/09/politics/d...index.html

That is not what he was saying and you know it.

He was referencing defending your 2nd amendment rights.

You can disagree that the 2nd amendment rights are in danger if Clinton wins no problem

BUT

To suggest that one presidential candidate called for the assassination of another is fundamentally dishonest and is why people do not trust our country's media.

No, it is not fundamentally dishonest. What is dishonest is your lame justification.

Obama was going to take away your guns. No one with a brain believes these cry wolf moments anymore.

front page on CNN, CBS, msnbc, nbc, & abc right now. only NBC doesn't have it as their main story (covering the olympics because they own the rights). FNC is also now covering it. lol at the cons saying it is not a major story.

also being covered as a major story by bbc, the guardian, and every site I just checked.

edit: actually doesn't look like FNC is covering it

(08-09-2016 03:35 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 03:30 PM)solohawks Wrote:  Stuff like this is why the media has a putrid reputation.

So...even if we follow your explanation to it's "logical" conclusion. If a properly elected president and a properly selected supreme court properly repeals the second amendment, your saying it's okay for citizens to fight back with weapons?

Now of course, that's never going to happen because the Supreme Court can't repeal the second amendment and a repeal would never pass the public vote anyway...but it's no better. It's still a dog whistle for those with guns to do something to make sure it never does happen.

Still no better. Sorry.

The 2nd Amendment only describes a "God-given" or "natural" right. There was debate about whether to include a Bill of Rights just because some might think that it was the government granting those rights.

No governments can revoke the human right of self defense....only interfere with it.

(08-09-2016 03:41 PM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  Trump voter: "I like Trump because he says exactly what he means."
Trump: 'Somebody shoot my opponent'
Trump voter: 'He didn't mean that'

(08-09-2016 03:46 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 03:43 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 03:42 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 03:34 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  MSM is hell bent on grabbing and twisting anything Trump says into anything under the sun.

Come on man. How much twisting do they really need to do with this guy. This is a daily occurrence!

And you hang on his every silly word. He should get his mail sent to inside some of your noggins with how much he sets up camp there.

Presidents don't utter silly words.

but what difference does it make at this point?

(08-09-2016 03:48 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 03:47 PM)dbackjon Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 03:34 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  MSM is hell bent on grabbing and twisting anything Trump says into anything under the sun.

No, it is the blind Trump supporters that are doing the mental gymnastics to try to justify voting for a mentally unstable, treasonous, bad businessman, racist fool

Wow that is Hillary, if just insert woman and take out man.

He's a buffoon. Whatever thought comes into his head just falls out of his stupid mouth. Someone needs to get him on a permanent teleprompter.

I seriously wonder at this point what it would take for people to stop supporting him (not the whacked out creepy alt-right that actually likes the **** he spews, but the ostensibly thinking people that are voting for him).

And remember folks...I'm the one who always gets accused of carrying water!

So how did Trump call for the assassination of Clinton again?

(08-09-2016 03:53 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  So how did Trump call for the assassination of Clinton again?

We aren't sure...

But, it's on the news and that means it's reality!

this was not a dog whistle... you libtards always get your panties in a wad..

(08-09-2016 03:49 PM)dbackjon Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 03:38 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 03:33 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 03:28 PM)solohawks Wrote:  This was in my hometown so i watched it while i was at work. He was stating that if Clinton won the election and got to pick the supreme court justices the 2nd amendment would be dead and there is nothing anyone could do about it. He then said that there might be something the 2nd amendment folks could do about it, obviously making a play on how people with guns could stand up for themselves if someone tried to take away their gun.

Absolutely in no way shape or form did he call for someone to assassinate Clinton. To suggest otherwise is fundatmentally dishonest.

I stand by my comments. There is no reason to invoke "The Second Amendment" as a way to stop a President from exercising his/her constitutional duties.

Total dog whistle... http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/09/politics/d...index.html

That is not what he was saying and you know it.

He was referencing defending your 2nd amendment rights.

You can disagree that the 2nd amendment rights are in danger if Clinton wins no problem

BUT

To suggest that one presidential candidate called for the assassination of another is fundamentally dishonest and is why people do not trust our country's media.

No, it is not fundamentally dishonest. What is dishonest is your lame justification.

Obama was going to take away your guns. No one with a brain believes these cry wolf moments anymore.

Exactly... There are more guns in this country than there are people... And yet people keep insisting (including DJT) that liberals are going to abolish the 2nd Amendment... Get real!

When Trump stands in front of a crowd and tells them that Hillary Clinton is going to abolish the 2nd Amendment, that is fundamentally dishonest.

(08-09-2016 03:50 PM)dbackjon Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 03:41 PM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  Trump voter: "I like Trump because he says exactly what he means."
Trump: 'Somebody shoot my opponent'
Trump voter: 'He didn't mean that'

50 GOP security experts say they won't vote for trump and story is covered on the 50 biggest media outlets.

Trump voter: "I never heard that story"


that's my personal favorite.

(08-09-2016 03:53 PM)BobcatEngineer Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 03:49 PM)dbackjon Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 03:38 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 03:33 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 03:28 PM)solohawks Wrote:  This was in my hometown so i watched it while i was at work. He was stating that if Clinton won the election and got to pick the supreme court justices the 2nd amendment would be dead and there is nothing anyone could do about it. He then said that there might be something the 2nd amendment folks could do about it, obviously making a play on how people with guns could stand up for themselves if someone tried to take away their gun.

Absolutely in no way shape or form did he call for someone to assassinate Clinton. To suggest otherwise is fundatmentally dishonest.

I stand by my comments. There is no reason to invoke "The Second Amendment" as a way to stop a President from exercising his/her constitutional duties.

Total dog whistle... http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/09/politics/d...index.html

That is not what he was saying and you know it.

He was referencing defending your 2nd amendment rights.

You can disagree that the 2nd amendment rights are in danger if Clinton wins no problem

BUT

To suggest that one presidential candidate called for the assassination of another is fundamentally dishonest and is why people do not trust our country's media.

No, it is not fundamentally dishonest. What is dishonest is your lame justification.

Obama was going to take away your guns. No one with a brain believes these cry wolf moments anymore.

Exactly... There are more guns in this country than there are people... And yet people keep insisting (including DJT) that liberals are going to abolish the 2nd Amendment... Get real!

When Trump stands in front of a crowd and tells them that Hillary Clinton is going to abolish the 2nd Amendment, that is fundamentally dishonest.

Not really...

Your second Amendment right is just like that to Free Speech, it is an on/off switch.

Hillary talking about "regulations" is throwing that off switch.

These dolts that believe DJT threatened Cankles Clinton are the low info voters any how.

Hooray for the 2nd Amendment and Boooo to the State Run Media!!

(08-09-2016 03:53 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 03:53 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  So how did Trump call for the assassination of Clinton again?

We aren't sure...

But, it's on the news and that means it's reality!

(08-09-2016 03:49 PM)dbackjon Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 03:38 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 03:33 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 03:28 PM)solohawks Wrote:  This was in my hometown so i watched it while i was at work. He was stating that if Clinton won the election and got to pick the supreme court justices the 2nd amendment would be dead and there is nothing anyone could do about it. He then said that there might be something the 2nd amendment folks could do about it, obviously making a play on how people with guns could stand up for themselves if someone tried to take away their gun.

Absolutely in no way shape or form did he call for someone to assassinate Clinton. To suggest otherwise is fundatmentally dishonest.

I stand by my comments. There is no reason to invoke "The Second Amendment" as a way to stop a President from exercising his/her constitutional duties.

Total dog whistle... http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/09/politics/d...index.html

That is not what he was saying and you know it.

He was referencing defending your 2nd amendment rights.

You can disagree that the 2nd amendment rights are in danger if Clinton wins no problem

BUT

To suggest that one presidential candidate called for the assassination of another is fundamentally dishonest and is why people do not trust our country's media.

No, it is not fundamentally dishonest. What is dishonest is your lame justification.

Obama was going to take away your guns. No one with a brain believes these cry wolf moments anymore.

First, I am respectfully asking you to remove your post misquoting my words

2nd, did you watch the video?