From a friend funnier than me:

"James Comey reviewed the photo and found no evidence of intent."

Kevin Spacey defense...

Everybody knows those people from backwards Minnestota are sexual predators

(Am I doing it right dems?)

(11-16-2017 11:33 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:24 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:17 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:08 AM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:07 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Al Franken's response was really good. Whether the accusation is true or not, he's got good staff advising him

So you don't think he should resign immediately? Hmmm.....

Nope.

There's a difference between

1) One accusation and multiple accusations
2) The response of the accused in these cases. Franken's response is consistent of someone who isn't hiding anything.
3) And note, at least Franken had a reason to be physically in contact with the accuser. Physical comedy. There's no reason for Roy Moore to be asking out 16 year olds as a 32 year old man.

There's a whole LOT more allegations going on against Roy Moore. A lot more. At some point the sheer volume of accusations against Moore lends credibility to the charges. Remember the Franken case is a he said, she said. Moore's situation is a 'he said, she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and the mall employees said...

Sure, investigate Franken. Lets see if other women come out against Franken. Lets see if there's any other issues going on. And Franken isn't acting like someone who has something to hide. Moore is.

So there is something wrong with liking younger females even when they are of the age of consent? I don't think there is any doubt he dated 18 year olds when he was in his 30s. So what? I don't think there is much doubt he dated 16 and 17 year olds when he was in his 30s. He married a 24 year old when he was 38.

The genuine question is whether the 14 year old is telling the truth and if any of the claims of him doing things against their will is true.

Let Roy Moore admit to asking 16 year old girls out on dates as a 32 year old, but not having sex with anyone under that....if you'd like to make that argument. I still think it makes him a creep.

BTW, this sh*t happens in the Gay community too. I had some creep in Alabama call my father to contact me to ask me out on a date (I had refused to give him my phone number when he previously asked - so the creep called my dad to get in touch with me). There was a 40+ year age difference going on.

BTW, theres no issue about age of consent in the Franken allegation.

#WHATABOUTISM...

Lol

(11-16-2017 11:34 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:33 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:23 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:21 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:17 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Nope.

There's a difference between

1) One accusation and multiple accusations
2) The response of the accused in these cases. Franken's response is consistent of someone who isn't hiding anything.
3) And note, at least Franken had a reason to be physically in contact with the accuser. Physical comedy. There's no reason for Roy Moore to be asking out 16 year olds as a 32 year old man.

There's a whole LOT more allegations going on against Roy Moore. A lot more. At some point the sheer volume of accusations against Moore lends credibility to the charges. Remember the Franken case is a he said, she said. Moore's situation is a 'he said, she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and the mall employees said...

Sure, investigate Franken. Lets see if other women come out against Franken. Lets see if there's any other issues going on. And Franken isn't acting like someone who has something to hide. Moore is.

So now the burden of proof is the number of accusers not the validity of the claim. Well done.

LOL. Theres a difference between one accuser and a dozen accusers. Look, lets investigate. But there's a big difference between one person saying 'he did it' and a dozen unrelated accusers saying 'he did it" with multiple sources of additional corroboration.

Sure, lets investigate Franken. But there's a HUGE discrepancy in the volume of the accusations at this point.

He should resign until the investigation is complete

Yup...

He's guilty.

/s

#redundantandrhetoricalpilingon

(11-16-2017 11:51 AM)shere khan Wrote:  Everybody knows those people from backwards Minnestota sexual predators

(Am I doing it right dems?)

Change "knows" to "knowed" and you're doing it the DavidSt way.

(11-16-2017 11:52 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:33 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:24 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:17 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:08 AM)usmbacker Wrote:  So you don't think he should resign immediately? Hmmm.....

Nope.

There's a difference between

1) One accusation and multiple accusations
2) The response of the accused in these cases. Franken's response is consistent of someone who isn't hiding anything.
3) And note, at least Franken had a reason to be physically in contact with the accuser. Physical comedy. There's no reason for Roy Moore to be asking out 16 year olds as a 32 year old man.

There's a whole LOT more allegations going on against Roy Moore. A lot more. At some point the sheer volume of accusations against Moore lends credibility to the charges. Remember the Franken case is a he said, she said. Moore's situation is a 'he said, she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and the mall employees said...

Sure, investigate Franken. Lets see if other women come out against Franken. Lets see if there's any other issues going on. And Franken isn't acting like someone who has something to hide. Moore is.

So there is something wrong with liking younger females even when they are of the age of consent? I don't think there is any doubt he dated 18 year olds when he was in his 30s. So what? I don't think there is much doubt he dated 16 and 17 year olds when he was in his 30s. He married a 24 year old when he was 38.

The genuine question is whether the 14 year old is telling the truth and if any of the claims of him doing things against their will is true.

Let Roy Moore admit to asking 16 year old girls out on dates as a 32 year old, but not having sex with anyone under that....if you'd like to make that argument. I still think it makes him a creep.

BTW, this sh*t happens in the Gay community too. I had some creep in Alabama call my father to contact me to ask me out on a date (I had refused to give him my phone number when he previously asked - so the creep called my dad to get in touch with me). There was a 40+ year age difference going on.

BTW, theres no issue about age of consent in the Franken allegation.

#WHATABOUTISM...

Lol

False equivalency from opposition research.

We learn fast

(11-16-2017 11:51 AM)shere khan Wrote:  Everybody knows those people from backwards Minnestota are sexual predators

(Am I doing it right dems?)

(11-16-2017 11:51 AM)shere khan Wrote:  Everybody knows those people from backwards Minnestota are sexual predators

(11-16-2017 11:48 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  By the way, MSNBC has the accuser coming on right now.

Thanks for the heads up (no homo)! Caught the tail end(no homo)of her interview. Sounds like some are trying to say that because she modeled, she deserved to be assaulted.

(11-16-2017 11:49 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:47 AM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:24 AM)Dasville Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:21 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:17 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Nope.

There's a difference between

1) One accusation and multiple accusations
2) The response of the accused in these cases. Franken's response is consistent of someone who isn't hiding anything.
3) And note, at least Franken had a reason to be physically in contact with the accuser. Physical comedy. There's no reason for Roy Moore to be asking out 16 year olds as a 32 year old man.

There's a whole LOT more allegations going on against Roy Moore. A lot more. At some point the sheer volume of accusations against Moore lends credibility to the charges. Remember the Franken case is a he said, she said. Moore's situation is a 'he said, she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and the mall employees said...

Sure, investigate Franken. Lets see if other women come out against Franken. Lets see if there's any other issues going on. And Franken isn't acting like someone who has something to hide. Moore is.

So now the burden of proof is the number of accusers not the validity of the claim. Well done. They should all wear similar uniforms and get the accused in the middle of the night for efficiency.

Didn't Bill have like 18-20 women accuse him of sexual misconduct?

Don't ask Tom about Bill. You see in the world of libs, Bill is a saint and his actions were justified when he abused an intern or raped Juanita Broderick. It is the world of double standards libs live in. They relentlessly attack Trump after failing to even bother to admit Bill's criminal sexual history.

Uh, Bill Clinton is not relevant.

And Bill Clinton was investigated.

Thank you for being the lib we know you to be. Bill Clinton in a time of all the sexual abuse being in the news, is 1000% relevant. It is typical hypocritical, double standard libs like you that refuse to see that Bill Clinton wrote the manual on sexaul abuse from the days he was Attorney General in Arkansas.

(11-16-2017 11:37 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Why don't we just go ahead and build a gallows?

I mean, we want to be safe right?

Is there room next to the concentration camps?

Might save $$$’s, economies of scale and all...


Lulz.

(11-16-2017 11:54 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:52 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:33 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:24 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:17 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Nope.

There's a difference between

1) One accusation and multiple accusations
2) The response of the accused in these cases. Franken's response is consistent of someone who isn't hiding anything.
3) And note, at least Franken had a reason to be physically in contact with the accuser. Physical comedy. There's no reason for Roy Moore to be asking out 16 year olds as a 32 year old man.

There's a whole LOT more allegations going on against Roy Moore. A lot more. At some point the sheer volume of accusations against Moore lends credibility to the charges. Remember the Franken case is a he said, she said. Moore's situation is a 'he said, she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and she said, and the mall employees said...

Sure, investigate Franken. Lets see if other women come out against Franken. Lets see if there's any other issues going on. And Franken isn't acting like someone who has something to hide. Moore is.

So there is something wrong with liking younger females even when they are of the age of consent? I don't think there is any doubt he dated 18 year olds when he was in his 30s. So what? I don't think there is much doubt he dated 16 and 17 year olds when he was in his 30s. He married a 24 year old when he was 38.

The genuine question is whether the 14 year old is telling the truth and if any of the claims of him doing things against their will is true.

Let Roy Moore admit to asking 16 year old girls out on dates as a 32 year old, but not having sex with anyone under that....if you'd like to make that argument. I still think it makes him a creep.

BTW, this sh*t happens in the Gay community too. I had some creep in Alabama call my father to contact me to ask me out on a date (I had refused to give him my phone number when he previously asked - so the creep called my dad to get in touch with me). There was a 40+ year age difference going on.

BTW, theres no issue about age of consent in the Franken allegation.

#WHATABOUTISM...

Lol

False equivalency from opposition research.

We learn fast

no doubt....change the rules on the fly and see how it works out.........yeah baby, yeahhhhhhh

(11-16-2017 11:50 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:47 AM)Chappy Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 10:55 AM)usmbacker Wrote:  

Look at that outfit. She was asking for it.

Assaulted a officer in uniform while sleeping. He should face ethics charges and flack jacket sensitivity training.

I see air in those hands, not breast. Can you even grab breast through that armor?

(11-16-2017 11:56 AM)Dasville Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:48 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  By the way, MSNBC has the accuser coming on right now.

Thanks for the heads up! Caught the tail end of her interview. Sounds like some are trying to say that because she modeled, she deserved to be assaulted.

And MSNBC wasn't saying it. They were calling out that 'defense' as BS. Just because a woman dresses in a certain way, it doesn't mean that they 'want it'.

I think the allegations should be investigated. But if its just a miscommunication over physical comedy, I think he will survive. But lets see what else is out there. Not that he *should* get a pass, but that's how it will go down. Now if you have NINE different people accuse him...then that's a different story.

(11-16-2017 11:56 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:51 AM)shere khan Wrote:  Everybody knows those people from backwards Minnestota are sexual predators

Lol. I thought those were the new rules combined with If true (has to be). Deeply disturbing and a laundry list if other logical fallacies.

(11-16-2017 11:56 AM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:49 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:47 AM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:24 AM)Dasville Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:21 AM)shere khan Wrote:  So now the burden of proof is the number of accusers not the validity of the claim. Well done. They should all wear similar uniforms and get the accused in the middle of the night for efficiency.

Didn't Bill have like 18-20 women accuse him of sexual misconduct?

Don't ask Tom about Bill. You see in the world of libs, Bill is a saint and his actions were justified when he abused an intern or raped Juanita Broderick. It is the world of double standards libs live in. They relentlessly attack Trump after failing to even bother to admit Bill's criminal sexual history.

Uh, Bill Clinton is not relevant.

And Bill Clinton was investigated.

Thank you for being the lib we know you to be. Bill Clinton in a time of all the sexual abuse being in the news, is 1000% relevant. It is typical hypocritical, double standard libs like you that refuse to see that Bill Clinton wrote the manual on sexaul abuse from the days he was Attorney General in Arkansas.

isn't it funny how the 'thought stream' was once "people easily forgive and forget?"

#dipshites

we simply waited it out until it mattered......

I suggest you libs refusing to take this seriously and defending Franken, read this again....

Quote:I immediately pushed him away with both of my hands against his chest and told him if he ever did that to me again I wouldn’t be so nice about it the next time.

I walked away. All I could think about was getting to a bathroom as fast as possible to rinse the taste of him out of my mouth.

I felt disgusted and violated.

Not long after, I performed the skit as written, carefully turning my head so he couldn’t kiss me on the lips.

No one saw what happened backstage. I didn’t tell the Sergeant Major of the Army, who was the sponsor of the tour. I didn’t tell our USO rep what happened.

So when can we expect your demand that Franken resign from the US Senate?

(11-16-2017 12:00 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  I suggest you libs refusing to take this seriously and defending Franken, read this again....

Quote:I immediately pushed him away with both of my hands against his chest and told him if he ever did that to me again I wouldn’t be so nice about it the next time.

I walked away. All I could think about was getting to a bathroom as fast as possible to rinse the taste of him out of my mouth.

I felt disgusted and violated.

Not long after, I performed the skit as written, carefully turning my head so he couldn’t kiss me on the lips.

No one saw what happened backstage. I didn’t tell the Sergeant Major of the Army, who was the sponsor of the tour. I didn’t tell our USO rep what happened.

So when can we expect your demand that Franken resign from the US Senate?

When he becomes a Republican?

(11-16-2017 11:58 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:56 AM)Dasville Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:48 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  By the way, MSNBC has the accuser coming on right now.

Thanks for the heads up! Caught the tail end of her interview. Sounds like some are trying to say that because she modeled, she deserved to be assaulted.

And MSNBC wasn't saying it. They were calling out that 'defense' as BS. Just because a woman dresses in a certain way, it doesn't mean that they 'want it'.

Tom I feel for you having to defend this.(not a dog whistle. I am straight)