Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Rank the AAC
Author Message
WhoseHouse? Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,080
Joined: Dec 2015
Reputation: 482
I Root For: UH
Location:
Post: #61
RE: Rank the AAC
(11-21-2017 01:48 AM)St. H. Gink Wrote:  
(11-19-2017 11:02 PM)Tigersmoke4 Wrote:  
(11-19-2017 03:12 PM)St. H. Gink Wrote:  1. UCF (Flagship. Class of the conference.)
2. Memphis (Only loss was beatdown to UCF.)
3. S. Florida (Struggled with Tulsa but still 9-1.)
4. Navy (Great game against ND.)
5. Houston (Is this the end of Applewhite?)
6. SMU (Currently in their toughest stretch.)
7. Temple (Stock is rising.)
8. Tulane (Stock is dropping.)
9. East Carolina (Nice win over Cincy.)
10. UConn (Not a bad showing against BC.)
11. Cincinnati (Blown out by a two-win team.)
12. Tulsa (Just two wins on the year.)


07-coffee3

Flagship?class of the conference? Does that include o-12, because I don't recall Memphis ever doing that in the AAC. We've been probably the most consistently "good football program " in this conference 07-coffee3

I hope you’re aware that this is a ranking of the conference based on the play of the past week.

However, let’s play your game and say this is instead a ranking of every team’s entire time in the AAC. It doesn’t change anything for UCF.

AAC Championships

2 UCF (No. 3 coming?)
1 Cincinnati
1 Houston
1 Memphis
1 Temple

AAC Wins

26 UCF
27 Houston
24 Memphis
24 South Florida
23 Temple
19 Cincinnati
18 Navy
12 SMU
12 Tulsa
11 East Carolina
11 UConn
7 Tulane


07-coffee3

UH has 27 wins, Temple has 23. CCG counts as a conference game.
11-21-2017 03:42 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
NestaKnight1 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,844
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation: 99
I Root For: UCF
Location:
Post: #62
RE: Rank the AAC
(11-20-2017 09:28 PM)TripleA Wrote:  
(11-20-2017 07:47 PM)NestaKnight1 Wrote:  
(11-20-2017 07:19 PM)TripleA Wrote:  
(11-20-2017 04:11 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  
(11-20-2017 09:35 AM)TripleA Wrote:  If 10-0 is relevant, then so the hell is 0-12. Just sayin'...

I don't know what you are talking about. #shortmemory 07-coffee3

LOL. Good response. And convenient.

I’ll point out that there isn’t much difference between 1-10 and 0-12. 03-shhhh

Oh yeah, an ocean between them, at least, lol. Plus, that was 7 years ago, not 2. Nobody except you remembers that. 03-lmfao

It’s also Memphis’ all time record against a certain team that went 0-12 2 years ago. 04-jawdrop
(This post was last modified: 11-21-2017 05:55 AM by NestaKnight1.)
11-21-2017 05:54 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TripleA Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 58,463
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 3153
I Root For: Memphis Tigers
Location: The woods of Bammer

Memphis Hall of Fame
Post: #63
RE: Rank the AAC
(11-21-2017 05:54 AM)NestaKnight1 Wrote:  
(11-20-2017 09:28 PM)TripleA Wrote:  
(11-20-2017 07:47 PM)NestaKnight1 Wrote:  
(11-20-2017 07:19 PM)TripleA Wrote:  
(11-20-2017 04:11 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  I don't know what you are talking about. #shortmemory 07-coffee3

LOL. Good response. And convenient.

I’ll point out that there isn’t much difference between 1-10 and 0-12. 03-shhhh

Oh yeah, an ocean between them, at least, lol. Plus, that was 7 years ago, not 2. Nobody except you remembers that. 03-lmfao

It’s also Memphis’ all time record against a certain team that went 0-12 2 years ago. 04-jawdrop

Beat USF Friday, and we'll see how it goes next time. Past becomes irrelevant. Ask Tulsa, Houston, Navy, UCLA, etc. History is always just that.
11-21-2017 08:19 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Sideshow2313 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,641
Joined: Jul 2008
Reputation: 41
I Root For: UCF
Location:
Post: #64
RE: Rank the AAC
That 0-12 sucked. JMO UCF was butt of everyone jokes so we deserve to crow till we have to eat it once again.

Its all a cycle we will suck once again hopefully not for at least 2 weeks.

UCF is not the flagship, there is no flagship in this conference. Maybe in a few more years but 5 years is not enough to widen one team over others.
11-21-2017 08:47 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
OldManTiger Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 616
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 88
I Root For: UMTigers
Location:
Post: #65
RE: Rank the AAC
(11-19-2017 01:37 PM)TripleA Wrote:  With one week left, I'll go with this, more or less.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/sta.../group/151

1. UCF
2. Memphis

3. USF
4. Navy
5. Houston
6. SMU

7. Temple
8. Tulane

9. ECU
10. UConn
11. Cincinnati
12. Tulsa

TA: The ESPN rankings say we haven't beaten a top 25. But at the time we won, both UCLA (#25 in AP week 3) and Navy (#25 in AP and #24 in Coaches) were ranked. Shouldn't our record be 2-1 (with UCF as the loss)?
11-21-2017 09:51 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TripleA Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 58,463
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 3153
I Root For: Memphis Tigers
Location: The woods of Bammer

Memphis Hall of Fame
Post: #66
RE: Rank the AAC
(11-21-2017 09:51 AM)OldManTiger Wrote:  
(11-19-2017 01:37 PM)TripleA Wrote:  With one week left, I'll go with this, more or less.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/sta.../group/151

1. UCF
2. Memphis

3. USF
4. Navy
5. Houston
6. SMU

7. Temple
8. Tulane

9. ECU
10. UConn
11. Cincinnati
12. Tulsa

TA: The ESPN rankings say we haven't beaten a top 25. But at the time we won, both UCLA (#25 in AP week 3) and Navy (#25 in AP and #24 in Coaches) were ranked. Shouldn't our record be 2-1 (with UCF as the loss)?

If you scroll through each team's schedule, and then try to find the AP/Coaches wins and losses, it is not consistent. They seem to be counting wins and losses as the rankings were at the time of the game, as is their tradition. My guess is they just aren't accurate. Under that criteria, yes, we should be 2-1.

Also, before Quo has a stroke, the CFP does NOT count ranked wins at the time the game was played, but only counts them if they remain in their poll.
11-21-2017 12:34 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
NestaKnight1 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,844
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation: 99
I Root For: UCF
Location:
Post: #67
RE: Rank the AAC
(11-21-2017 08:47 AM)Sideshow2313 Wrote:  That 0-12 sucked. JMO UCF was butt of everyone jokes so we deserve to crow till we have to eat it once again.

Its all a cycle we will suck once again hopefully not for at least 2 weeks.

UCF is not the flagship, there is no flagship in this conference. Maybe in a few more years but 5 years is not enough to widen one team over others.

Someone wanna revoke that man’s UCF fan card! 03-lmfao
11-21-2017 03:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
sfink16 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,571
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation: 73
I Root For: Temple
Location: Dubois, Pa
Post: #68
RE: Rank the AAC
(11-21-2017 09:51 AM)OldManTiger Wrote:  
(11-19-2017 01:37 PM)TripleA Wrote:  With one week left, I'll go with this, more or less.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/sta.../group/151

1. UCF
2. Memphis

3. USF
4. Navy
5. Houston
6. SMU

7. Temple
8. Tulane

9. ECU
10. UConn
11. Cincinnati
12. Tulsa

TA: The ESPN rankings say we haven't beaten a top 25. But at the time we won, both UCLA (#25 in AP week 3) and Navy (#25 in AP and #24 in Coaches) were ranked. Shouldn't our record be 2-1 (with UCF as the loss)?

I've never seen the ESPN ranking include anything but the current week rankings. Beating UCLA in week 3 when they are ranked never is considered beating a ranked team in week 12 if that team is no longer ranked. UCLA has long been gone from the rankings, as has Navy for that matter. Memphis should have an 0 and 1 record under the criteria that's been the norm in forever, as far as I remember. Prove me wrong.
11-21-2017 03:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TripleA Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 58,463
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 3153
I Root For: Memphis Tigers
Location: The woods of Bammer

Memphis Hall of Fame
Post: #69
RE: Rank the AAC
(11-21-2017 03:40 PM)sfink16 Wrote:  
(11-21-2017 09:51 AM)OldManTiger Wrote:  
(11-19-2017 01:37 PM)TripleA Wrote:  With one week left, I'll go with this, more or less.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/sta.../group/151

1. UCF
2. Memphis

3. USF
4. Navy
5. Houston
6. SMU

7. Temple
8. Tulane

9. ECU
10. UConn
11. Cincinnati
12. Tulsa

TA: The ESPN rankings say we haven't beaten a top 25. But at the time we won, both UCLA (#25 in AP week 3) and Navy (#25 in AP and #24 in Coaches) were ranked. Shouldn't our record be 2-1 (with UCF as the loss)?

I've never seen the ESPN ranking include anything but the current week rankings. Beating UCLA in week 3 when they are ranked never is considered beating a ranked team in week 12 if that team is no longer ranked. UCLA has long been gone from the rankings, as has Navy for that matter. Memphis should have an 0 and 1 record under the criteria that's been the norm in forever, as far as I remember. Prove me wrong.

It is NOT on the ESPN weekly rankings, lol. Of course that is only the current rankings. But you can scroll back and see any week you want with the drop down menu.

But that is irrelevant. Go look at anybody's schedule on ESPN. If the team you played was ranked the week you played, it is listed there. Never goes away, regardless of current rankings.

Here are a few AAC examples:

UCF: They beat a currently ranked Memphis team, but it was when we were not ranked. It is not noted on the UCF schedule.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/tea...cf-knights

Memphis: We have wins over #25 UCLA and #25 Navy. Neither are ranked now, but they were when we played them, and those rankings are so noted.

Also, look at UCF on the Memphis schedule. UCF is not noted as being ranked then, although they certainly are now.

And ESPN uses the AP Poll, until the CFP starts.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/tea...his-tigers

Does anybody use these formally for anything? No, just for bragging right on message boards, I suppose.

The CFP doesn't use that method. They only count wins against currently ranked CFP teams.

But the NCAAT SC for BB does use the other method. They count wins ranked by where they were when you beat them. They also use plenty of other criteria, but that one is in there.

They also use wins against Top 50 and Top 100 teams, but only if they are there at the end of the season. So they are covered both ways.
11-21-2017 04:04 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
St. H. Gink Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,019
Joined: Jul 2008
Reputation: 123
I Root For: CollegeFootball
Location:
Post: #70
RE: Rank the AAC
(11-21-2017 04:04 PM)TripleA Wrote:  
(11-21-2017 03:40 PM)sfink16 Wrote:  
(11-21-2017 09:51 AM)OldManTiger Wrote:  
(11-19-2017 01:37 PM)TripleA Wrote:  With one week left, I'll go with this, more or less.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/sta.../group/151

1. UCF
2. Memphis

3. USF
4. Navy
5. Houston
6. SMU

7. Temple
8. Tulane

9. ECU
10. UConn
11. Cincinnati
12. Tulsa

TA: The ESPN rankings say we haven't beaten a top 25. But at the time we won, both UCLA (#25 in AP week 3) and Navy (#25 in AP and #24 in Coaches) were ranked. Shouldn't our record be 2-1 (with UCF as the loss)?

I've never seen the ESPN ranking include anything but the current week rankings. Beating UCLA in week 3 when they are ranked never is considered beating a ranked team in week 12 if that team is no longer ranked. UCLA has long been gone from the rankings, as has Navy for that matter. Memphis should have an 0 and 1 record under the criteria that's been the norm in forever, as far as I remember. Prove me wrong.

It is NOT on the ESPN weekly rankings, lol. Of course that is only the current rankings. But you can scroll back and see any week you want with the drop down menu.

But that is irrelevant. Go look at anybody's schedule on ESPN. If the team you played was ranked the week you played, it is listed there. Never goes away, regardless of current rankings.

Here are a few AAC examples:

UCF: They beat a currently ranked Memphis team, but it was when we were not ranked. It is not noted on the UCF schedule.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/tea...cf-knights

Memphis: We have wins over #25 UCLA and #25 Navy. Neither are ranked now, but they were when we played them, and those rankings are so noted.

Also, look at UCF on the Memphis schedule. UCF is not noted as being ranked then, although they certainly are now.

And ESPN uses the AP Poll, until the CFP starts.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/tea...his-tigers

Does anybody use these formally for anything? No, just for bragging right on message boards, I suppose.

The CFP doesn't use that method. They only count wins against currently ranked CFP teams.

But the NCAAT SC for BB does use the other method. They count wins ranked by where they were when you beat them. They also use plenty of other criteria, but that one is in there.

They also use wins against Top 50 and Top 100 teams, but only if they are there at the end of the season. So they are covered both ways.


Dude, just stop.


07-coffee3
11-21-2017 04:09 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
vabearcat Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,279
Joined: Nov 2004
Reputation: 83
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #71
RE: Rank the AAC
(11-21-2017 03:40 PM)sfink16 Wrote:  
(11-21-2017 09:51 AM)OldManTiger Wrote:  
(11-19-2017 01:37 PM)TripleA Wrote:  With one week left, I'll go with this, more or less.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/sta.../group/151

1. UCF
2. Memphis

3. USF
4. Navy
5. Houston
6. SMU

7. Temple
8. Tulane

9. ECU
10. UConn
11. Cincinnati
12. Tulsa

TA: The ESPN rankings say we haven't beaten a top 25. But at the time we won, both UCLA (#25 in AP week 3) and Navy (#25 in AP and #24 in Coaches) were ranked. Shouldn't our record be 2-1 (with UCF as the loss)?

I've never seen the ESPN ranking include anything but the current week rankings. Beating UCLA in week 3 when they are ranked never is considered beating a ranked team in week 12 if that team is no longer ranked. UCLA has long been gone from the rankings, as has Navy for that matter. Memphis should have an 0 and 1 record under the criteria that's been the norm in forever, as far as I remember. Prove me wrong.

Hate to say it but Tulsa is better than us this year. Cincy has really earned the bottom rung of the AAC totem pole this football season although it is possible that we beat UCONN this Saturday and re-position the Huskies to their rightful place at the bottom of the football pecking order. Hopefully, next year will be better for UC. In the interim, we'll have another superb basketball campaign to help counter the woeful 2017 performance of the gridiron squad. Thank you Tommy Flubberville.
11-21-2017 04:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
sfink16 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,571
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation: 73
I Root For: Temple
Location: Dubois, Pa
Post: #72
RE: Rank the AAC
(11-21-2017 04:04 PM)TripleA Wrote:  
(11-21-2017 03:40 PM)sfink16 Wrote:  
(11-21-2017 09:51 AM)OldManTiger Wrote:  TA: The ESPN rankings say we haven't beaten a top 25. But at the time we won, both UCLA (#25 in AP week 3) and Navy (#25 in AP and #24 in Coaches) were ranked. Shouldn't our record be 2-1 (with UCF as the loss)?

I've never seen the ESPN ranking include anything but the current week rankings. Beating UCLA in week 3 when they are ranked never is considered beating a ranked team in week 12 if that team is no longer ranked. UCLA has long been gone from the rankings, as has Navy for that matter. Memphis should have an 0 and 1 record under the criteria that's been the norm in forever, as far as I remember. Prove me wrong.

It is NOT on the ESPN weekly rankings, lol. Of course that is only the current rankings. But you can scroll back and see any week you want with the drop down menu.

But that is irrelevant. Go look at anybody's schedule on ESPN. If the team you played was ranked the week you played, it is listed there. Never goes away, regardless of current rankings.

Here are a few AAC examples:

UCF: They beat a currently ranked Memphis team, but it was when we were not ranked. It is not noted on the UCF schedule.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/tea...cf-knights

Memphis: We have wins over #25 UCLA and #25 Navy. Neither are ranked now, but they were when we played them, and those rankings are so noted.

Also, look at UCF on the Memphis schedule. UCF is not noted as being ranked then, although they certainly are now.

And ESPN uses the AP Poll, until the CFP starts.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/tea...his-tigers

Does anybody use these formally for anything? No, just for bragging right on message boards, I suppose.

The CFP doesn't use that method. They only count wins against currently ranked CFP teams.

But the NCAAT SC for BB does use the other method. They count wins ranked by where they were when you beat them. They also use plenty of other criteria, but that one is in there.

They also use wins against Top 50 and Top 100 teams, but only if they are there at the end of the season. So they are covered both ways.

When Arkansas was a preseason #8 5+ years ago and finished 3 and 8, did the teams that beat them, especially early on, deserve credit for beating a ranked team? Of course not, they beat a bad team that year who happened to be ranked early.
11-21-2017 04:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TripleA Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 58,463
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 3153
I Root For: Memphis Tigers
Location: The woods of Bammer

Memphis Hall of Fame
Post: #73
RE: Rank the AAC
(11-21-2017 04:09 PM)St. H. Gink Wrote:  
(11-21-2017 04:04 PM)TripleA Wrote:  
(11-21-2017 03:40 PM)sfink16 Wrote:  
(11-21-2017 09:51 AM)OldManTiger Wrote:  
(11-19-2017 01:37 PM)TripleA Wrote:  With one week left, I'll go with this, more or less.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/sta.../group/151

1. UCF
2. Memphis

3. USF
4. Navy
5. Houston
6. SMU

7. Temple
8. Tulane

9. ECU
10. UConn
11. Cincinnati
12. Tulsa

TA: The ESPN rankings say we haven't beaten a top 25. But at the time we won, both UCLA (#25 in AP week 3) and Navy (#25 in AP and #24 in Coaches) were ranked. Shouldn't our record be 2-1 (with UCF as the loss)?

I've never seen the ESPN ranking include anything but the current week rankings. Beating UCLA in week 3 when they are ranked never is considered beating a ranked team in week 12 if that team is no longer ranked. UCLA has long been gone from the rankings, as has Navy for that matter. Memphis should have an 0 and 1 record under the criteria that's been the norm in forever, as far as I remember. Prove me wrong.

It is NOT on the ESPN weekly rankings, lol. Of course that is only the current rankings. But you can scroll back and see any week you want with the drop down menu.

But that is irrelevant. Go look at anybody's schedule on ESPN. If the team you played was ranked the week you played, it is listed there. Never goes away, regardless of current rankings.

Here are a few AAC examples:

UCF: They beat a currently ranked Memphis team, but it was when we were not ranked. It is not noted on the UCF schedule.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/tea...cf-knights

Memphis: We have wins over #25 UCLA and #25 Navy. Neither are ranked now, but they were when we played them, and those rankings are so noted.

Also, look at UCF on the Memphis schedule. UCF is not noted as being ranked then, although they certainly are now.

And ESPN uses the AP Poll, until the CFP starts.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/tea...his-tigers

Does anybody use these formally for anything? No, just for bragging right on message boards, I suppose.

The CFP doesn't use that method. They only count wins against currently ranked CFP teams.

But the NCAAT SC for BB does use the other method. They count wins ranked by where they were when you beat them. They also use plenty of other criteria, but that one is in there.

They also use wins against Top 50 and Top 100 teams, but only if they are there at the end of the season. So they are covered both ways.


Dude, just stop.


07-coffee3

Not my fault if you don't comprehend English, or are unable to follow links. Dude.
11-21-2017 09:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TripleA Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 58,463
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 3153
I Root For: Memphis Tigers
Location: The woods of Bammer

Memphis Hall of Fame
Post: #74
RE: Rank the AAC
(11-21-2017 04:15 PM)sfink16 Wrote:  
(11-21-2017 04:04 PM)TripleA Wrote:  
(11-21-2017 03:40 PM)sfink16 Wrote:  
(11-21-2017 09:51 AM)OldManTiger Wrote:  TA: The ESPN rankings say we haven't beaten a top 25. But at the time we won, both UCLA (#25 in AP week 3) and Navy (#25 in AP and #24 in Coaches) were ranked. Shouldn't our record be 2-1 (with UCF as the loss)?

I've never seen the ESPN ranking include anything but the current week rankings. Beating UCLA in week 3 when they are ranked never is considered beating a ranked team in week 12 if that team is no longer ranked. UCLA has long been gone from the rankings, as has Navy for that matter. Memphis should have an 0 and 1 record under the criteria that's been the norm in forever, as far as I remember. Prove me wrong.

It is NOT on the ESPN weekly rankings, lol. Of course that is only the current rankings. But you can scroll back and see any week you want with the drop down menu.

But that is irrelevant. Go look at anybody's schedule on ESPN. If the team you played was ranked the week you played, it is listed there. Never goes away, regardless of current rankings.

Here are a few AAC examples:

UCF: They beat a currently ranked Memphis team, but it was when we were not ranked. It is not noted on the UCF schedule.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/tea...cf-knights

Memphis: We have wins over #25 UCLA and #25 Navy. Neither are ranked now, but they were when we played them, and those rankings are so noted.

Also, look at UCF on the Memphis schedule. UCF is not noted as being ranked then, although they certainly are now.

And ESPN uses the AP Poll, until the CFP starts.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/tea...his-tigers

Does anybody use these formally for anything? No, just for bragging right on message boards, I suppose.

The CFP doesn't use that method. They only count wins against currently ranked CFP teams.

But the NCAAT SC for BB does use the other method. They count wins ranked by where they were when you beat them. They also use plenty of other criteria, but that one is in there.

They also use wins against Top 50 and Top 100 teams, but only if they are there at the end of the season. So they are covered both ways.

When Arkansas was a preseason #8 5+ years ago and finished 3 and 8, did the teams that beat them, especially early on, deserve credit for beating a ranked team? Of course not, they beat a bad team that year who happened to be ranked early.

Come on, guys. I am NOT arguing that it means anything at the end of the season. I actually SAID that. I also said the CFP doesn't use it, ONLY that ESPN does continue to list it, but only good for bragging rights.

However, it IS used in basketball. Along with Top 50 and Top 100 wins, which only count at the end of the season.

I'm not making an argument for ANYTHING, simply explaining what is listed where, and what is used where.
11-21-2017 09:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
PiratePanther189 Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 970
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 36
I Root For: ECU, AAC
Location:
Post: #75
RE: Rank the AAC
Eh, ECU has less upside than any other team in this conference at this point in time. Especially when looking from a hollistic athletic department perspective.

It will take years to work out contract issues, competitive on-the-field issues, and off-the-field resource issues. Our department is a project not meant for the weak at heart.
11-22-2017 01:13 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
St. H. Gink Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,019
Joined: Jul 2008
Reputation: 123
I Root For: CollegeFootball
Location:
Post: #76
RE: Rank the AAC
(11-21-2017 09:07 PM)TripleA Wrote:  
(11-21-2017 04:09 PM)St. H. Gink Wrote:  
(11-21-2017 04:04 PM)TripleA Wrote:  
(11-21-2017 03:40 PM)sfink16 Wrote:  
(11-21-2017 09:51 AM)OldManTiger Wrote:  TA: The ESPN rankings say we haven't beaten a top 25. But at the time we won, both UCLA (#25 in AP week 3) and Navy (#25 in AP and #24 in Coaches) were ranked. Shouldn't our record be 2-1 (with UCF as the loss)?

I've never seen the ESPN ranking include anything but the current week rankings. Beating UCLA in week 3 when they are ranked never is considered beating a ranked team in week 12 if that team is no longer ranked. UCLA has long been gone from the rankings, as has Navy for that matter. Memphis should have an 0 and 1 record under the criteria that's been the norm in forever, as far as I remember. Prove me wrong.

It is NOT on the ESPN weekly rankings, lol. Of course that is only the current rankings. But you can scroll back and see any week you want with the drop down menu.

But that is irrelevant. Go look at anybody's schedule on ESPN. If the team you played was ranked the week you played, it is listed there. Never goes away, regardless of current rankings.

Here are a few AAC examples:

UCF: They beat a currently ranked Memphis team, but it was when we were not ranked. It is not noted on the UCF schedule.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/tea...cf-knights

Memphis: We have wins over #25 UCLA and #25 Navy. Neither are ranked now, but they were when we played them, and those rankings are so noted.

Also, look at UCF on the Memphis schedule. UCF is not noted as being ranked then, although they certainly are now.

And ESPN uses the AP Poll, until the CFP starts.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/tea...his-tigers

Does anybody use these formally for anything? No, just for bragging right on message boards, I suppose.

The CFP doesn't use that method. They only count wins against currently ranked CFP teams.

But the NCAAT SC for BB does use the other method. They count wins ranked by where they were when you beat them. They also use plenty of other criteria, but that one is in there.

They also use wins against Top 50 and Top 100 teams, but only if they are there at the end of the season. So they are covered both ways.


Dude, just stop.


07-coffee3

Not my fault if you don't comprehend English, or are unable to follow links. Dude.


Just chill. Take a deep breath.

07-coffee3
11-22-2017 01:36 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TripleA Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 58,463
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 3153
I Root For: Memphis Tigers
Location: The woods of Bammer

Memphis Hall of Fame
Post: #77
RE: Rank the AAC
(11-22-2017 01:36 AM)St. H. Gink Wrote:  
(11-21-2017 09:07 PM)TripleA Wrote:  
(11-21-2017 04:09 PM)St. H. Gink Wrote:  
(11-21-2017 04:04 PM)TripleA Wrote:  
(11-21-2017 03:40 PM)sfink16 Wrote:  I've never seen the ESPN ranking include anything but the current week rankings. Beating UCLA in week 3 when they are ranked never is considered beating a ranked team in week 12 if that team is no longer ranked. UCLA has long been gone from the rankings, as has Navy for that matter. Memphis should have an 0 and 1 record under the criteria that's been the norm in forever, as far as I remember. Prove me wrong.

It is NOT on the ESPN weekly rankings, lol. Of course that is only the current rankings. But you can scroll back and see any week you want with the drop down menu.

But that is irrelevant. Go look at anybody's schedule on ESPN. If the team you played was ranked the week you played, it is listed there. Never goes away, regardless of current rankings.

Here are a few AAC examples:

UCF: They beat a currently ranked Memphis team, but it was when we were not ranked. It is not noted on the UCF schedule.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/tea...cf-knights

Memphis: We have wins over #25 UCLA and #25 Navy. Neither are ranked now, but they were when we played them, and those rankings are so noted.

Also, look at UCF on the Memphis schedule. UCF is not noted as being ranked then, although they certainly are now.

And ESPN uses the AP Poll, until the CFP starts.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/tea...his-tigers

Does anybody use these formally for anything? No, just for bragging right on message boards, I suppose.

The CFP doesn't use that method. They only count wins against currently ranked CFP teams.

But the NCAAT SC for BB does use the other method. They count wins ranked by where they were when you beat them. They also use plenty of other criteria, but that one is in there.

They also use wins against Top 50 and Top 100 teams, but only if they are there at the end of the season. So they are covered both ways.


Dude, just stop.


07-coffee3

Not my fault if you don't comprehend English, or are unable to follow links. Dude.


Just chill. Take a deep breath.

07-coffee3

I'm perfectly calm. You don't know me at all. I was simply explaining why some of the previous statements were incorrect. You can take it or leave it. But I'll do what I want, thanks. And I wasn't even talking to you in the first place.

What are you, the behavior hall monitor? 03-lmfao
(This post was last modified: 11-22-2017 07:10 AM by TripleA.)
11-22-2017 07:07 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bearcats#1 Offline
Ad nauseam King
*

Posts: 45,310
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 1224
I Root For: Pony94
Location: In your head.
Post: #78
RE: Rank the AAC
(11-22-2017 07:07 AM)TripleA Wrote:  
(11-22-2017 01:36 AM)St. H. Gink Wrote:  
(11-21-2017 09:07 PM)TripleA Wrote:  
(11-21-2017 04:09 PM)St. H. Gink Wrote:  
(11-21-2017 04:04 PM)TripleA Wrote:  It is NOT on the ESPN weekly rankings, lol. Of course that is only the current rankings. But you can scroll back and see any week you want with the drop down menu.

But that is irrelevant. Go look at anybody's schedule on ESPN. If the team you played was ranked the week you played, it is listed there. Never goes away, regardless of current rankings.

Here are a few AAC examples:

UCF: They beat a currently ranked Memphis team, but it was when we were not ranked. It is not noted on the UCF schedule.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/tea...cf-knights

Memphis: We have wins over #25 UCLA and #25 Navy. Neither are ranked now, but they were when we played them, and those rankings are so noted.

Also, look at UCF on the Memphis schedule. UCF is not noted as being ranked then, although they certainly are now.

And ESPN uses the AP Poll, until the CFP starts.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/tea...his-tigers

Does anybody use these formally for anything? No, just for bragging right on message boards, I suppose.

The CFP doesn't use that method. They only count wins against currently ranked CFP teams.

But the NCAAT SC for BB does use the other method. They count wins ranked by where they were when you beat them. They also use plenty of other criteria, but that one is in there.

They also use wins against Top 50 and Top 100 teams, but only if they are there at the end of the season. So they are covered both ways.


Dude, just stop.


07-coffee3

Not my fault if you don't comprehend English, or are unable to follow links. Dude.


Just chill. Take a deep breath.

07-coffee3

I'm perfectly calm. You don't know me at all. I was simply explaining why some of the previous statements were incorrect. You can take it or leave it. But I'll do what I want, thanks. And I wasn't even talking to you in the first place.

What are you, the behavior hall monitor? 03-lmfao

Why cant you play well with others!? lol
11-22-2017 09:08 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TripleA Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 58,463
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 3153
I Root For: Memphis Tigers
Location: The woods of Bammer

Memphis Hall of Fame
Post: #79
RE: Rank the AAC
(11-22-2017 09:08 AM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  
(11-22-2017 07:07 AM)TripleA Wrote:  
(11-22-2017 01:36 AM)St. H. Gink Wrote:  
(11-21-2017 09:07 PM)TripleA Wrote:  
(11-21-2017 04:09 PM)St. H. Gink Wrote:  Dude, just stop.


07-coffee3

Not my fault if you don't comprehend English, or are unable to follow links. Dude.


Just chill. Take a deep breath.

07-coffee3

I'm perfectly calm. You don't know me at all. I was simply explaining why some of the previous statements were incorrect. You can take it or leave it. But I'll do what I want, thanks. And I wasn't even talking to you in the first place.

What are you, the behavior hall monitor? 03-lmfao

Why cant you play well with others!? lol

I've been hanging around you and shere too much.
11-22-2017 09:09 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bearcats#1 Offline
Ad nauseam King
*

Posts: 45,310
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 1224
I Root For: Pony94
Location: In your head.
Post: #80
RE: Rank the AAC
(11-22-2017 09:09 AM)TripleA Wrote:  
(11-22-2017 09:08 AM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  
(11-22-2017 07:07 AM)TripleA Wrote:  
(11-22-2017 01:36 AM)St. H. Gink Wrote:  
(11-21-2017 09:07 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Not my fault if you don't comprehend English, or are unable to follow links. Dude.


Just chill. Take a deep breath.

07-coffee3

I'm perfectly calm. You don't know me at all. I was simply explaining why some of the previous statements were incorrect. You can take it or leave it. But I'll do what I want, thanks. And I wasn't even talking to you in the first place.

What are you, the behavior hall monitor? 03-lmfao

Why cant you play well with others!? lol

I've been hanging around you and shere too much.

Well, that will do it...
11-22-2017 09:21 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.