(12-05-2017 05:22 PM)inductchuck16 Wrote: (12-05-2017 03:19 PM)emu steve Wrote: Didn't the Mobile bowl have 1st choice on MAC teams and chose the MAC champ. Right?
Yes. I'm just wondering why in the world the MAC has it set up where our conference champion plays the Sun Belt champion. Can't we at least shoot for an American team? MWC would be better. CUSA, ehh it would be cool to have a chance to play Marshall again. But why the Sun Belt?
SBC was important for the MAC to sign when it didn't have better bowl options.
I would argue like you are doing that our interest is better served playing Marshall, ODU, FAU, FIU in a bowl game than playing Troy, AState, AppSt in bowls. More fan interest and recruiting value.
MAC also has talked a lot about having a footprint bowl again. One idea I've had is a Rock-n-Roll Bowl in Cleveland vs. Army/UMass if bowl eligible. Easy win on home turf for the MAC.
Secondly, I'm watching what is happening with the Holiday Bowl. The new venue in San Diego and 35,000 seats....looks more like a G5 bowl in this incarnation. Couuld the MAC pit its champ against the MWC champion?
1) Holiday Bowl (vs. MWC)
2) Bahamas Bowl (vs. CUSA)
3) Boca Raton (vs. CUSA)
4) Boise Bowl (vs. MWC)
5) Rock-n-Roll Bowl (vs. Army/UMass)
By doing the MWC a favor playing them in Boise, the MWC does the MAC a favor by going champ vs. champ with them in the Holiday.
This would at least get us out of playing Troy, Ark St, App St all of the time in no win situation.