Again...

Well that's been pretty obvious ..

I agree with that.

Those 8-4 teams in the west were fool's gold, Three blow-out bowl losses.
And their out of conference games were not any better. UNT blown out by SMU; UAB blown out by Ball State, and USM losing to Kentucky and Tennessee

The best team we beat all year was Marshall so.... yeah.

Sent from my SM-G930R7 using CSNbbs mobile app

yeps...east is a beast...thanks so much for carrying this **** conference...without ya'll, where would we be???

(12-27-2017 06:38 PM)NTTHOR Wrote:  yeps...east is a beast...thanks so much for carrying this **** conference...without ya'll, where would we be???

1-3 this bowl season.

(12-27-2017 05:39 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  I agree with that.

Those 8-4 teams in the west were fool's gold, Three blow-out bowl losses.
And their out of conference games were not any better. UNT blown out by SMU; UAB blown out by Ball State, and USM losing to Kentucky and Tennessee

Yep, and somehow LT managed to lose to all of us.

The West had harder bowl games.

Massey:

The East played: #73, #76, #79 #86, #107 = 84.2 average

The West played: #38, #47, #59, #62 = 51.5 average

I.E. Every single west bowl team played a more difficult game than every single East team. Drop the SMU game and it only makes it that much worse. CUSA east probably had the easiest bowl schedule for any division in college football if I had to guess without looking.

Why is FAU playing the 86th ranked team anyways.



Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

(12-27-2017 06:48 PM)Shrack Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 05:39 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  I agree with that.

Those 8-4 teams in the west were fool's gold, Three blow-out bowl losses.
And their out of conference games were not any better. UNT blown out by SMU; UAB blown out by Ball State, and USM losing to Kentucky and Tennessee

Yep, and somehow LT managed to lose to all of us.

The West had harder bowl games.

Massey:

The East played: #73, #76, #79 #86, #107 = 84.2 average

The West played: #38, #47, #59, #62 = 51.5 average

I.E. Every single west bowl team played a more difficult game than every single East team. Drop the SMU game and it only makes it that much worse. CUSA east probably had the easiest bowl schedule for any division in college football if I had to guess without looking.

Why is FAU playing the 86th ranked team anyways.



Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

All by one point, field goals and extra points. That shows how inept Tech offense was this season. Of course the refs had more to do with the UAB game.

Holtz would contend that injuries had the most to do with the inexplicable losses but it was combination of both.

SMU was #59 while Ohio was #62. The blow-out losses to Sunbelt and MAC teams is inexcusable

(12-27-2017 07:05 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 06:48 PM)Shrack Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 05:39 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  I agree with that.

Those 8-4 teams in the west were fool's gold, Three blow-out bowl losses.
And their out of conference games were not any better. UNT blown out by SMU; UAB blown out by Ball State, and USM losing to Kentucky and Tennessee

Yep, and somehow LT managed to lose to all of us.

The West had harder bowl games.

Massey:

The East played: #73, #76, #79 #86, #107 = 84.2 average

The West played: #38, #47, #59, #62 = 51.5 average

I.E. Every single west bowl team played a more difficult game than every single East team. Drop the SMU game and it only makes it that much worse. CUSA east probably had the easiest bowl schedule for any division in college football if I had to guess without looking.

Why is FAU playing the 86th ranked team anyways.



Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

All by one point, field goals and extra points. That shows how inept Tech offense was this season. Of course the refs had more to do with the UAB game.

Holtz would contend that injuries had the most to do with the inexplicable losses but it was combination of both.

SMU was #59 while Ohio was #62. The blow-out losses to Sunbelt and MAC teams is inexcusable

so you still lost those games...right? that's all that matters....who cares how you do it...your school lost plenty of games. a loss doesn't show how inept your team or coaches are, a loss shows that you were worse that day to the opposing team...at the end of the day, you lost those games...

NT has lost enough games in their history to be an unquestioned expert on losing.

(12-27-2017 07:32 PM)Noodles Wrote:  NT has lost enough games in their history to be an unquestioned expert on losing.

AMEN BROTHER!!!

but at least above .500 in our history

(12-27-2017 07:05 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 06:48 PM)Shrack Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 05:39 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  I agree with that.

Those 8-4 teams in the west were fool's gold, Three blow-out bowl losses.
And their out of conference games were not any better. UNT blown out by SMU; UAB blown out by Ball State, and USM losing to Kentucky and Tennessee

Yep, and somehow LT managed to lose to all of us.

The West had harder bowl games.

Massey:

The East played: #73, #76, #79 #86, #107 = 84.2 average

The West played: #38, #47, #59, #62 = 51.5 average

I.E. Every single west bowl team played a more difficult game than every single East team. Drop the SMU game and it only makes it that much worse. CUSA east probably had the easiest bowl schedule for any division in college football if I had to guess without looking.

Why is FAU playing the 86th ranked team anyways.



Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

All by one point, field goals and extra points. That shows how inept Tech offense was this season. Of course the refs had more to do with the UAB game.

Holtz would contend that injuries had the most to do with the inexplicable losses but it was combination of both.

SMU was #59 while Ohio was #62. The blow-out losses to Sunbelt and MAC teams is inexcusable

Lol

Ball State lost their QB for the year in the game after ours. His replacement was bad. I know it's so insane we would lose our first road game in 3 years with an entirely new team. How utterly inexcusable

Edit: I guess you're trying to say that SMU was better than Ohio. Ohio would've blown SMU out too. You got the luck of the draw playing against a mostly coachless team. LT did what they were supposed to do in that game though so they should get credit



Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

(12-27-2017 07:39 PM)Shrack Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 07:05 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 06:48 PM)Shrack Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 05:39 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  I agree with that.

Those 8-4 teams in the west were fool's gold, Three blow-out bowl losses.
And their out of conference games were not any better. UNT blown out by SMU; UAB blown out by Ball State, and USM losing to Kentucky and Tennessee

Yep, and somehow LT managed to lose to all of us.

The West had harder bowl games.

Massey:

The East played: #73, #76, #79 #86, #107 = 84.2 average

The West played: #38, #47, #59, #62 = 51.5 average

I.E. Every single west bowl team played a more difficult game than every single East team. Drop the SMU game and it only makes it that much worse. CUSA east probably had the easiest bowl schedule for any division in college football if I had to guess without looking.

Why is FAU playing the 86th ranked team anyways.



Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

All by one point, field goals and extra points. That shows how inept Tech offense was this season. Of course the refs had more to do with the UAB game.

Holtz would contend that injuries had the most to do with the inexplicable losses but it was combination of both.

SMU was #59 while Ohio was #62. The blow-out losses to Sunbelt and MAC teams is inexcusable

Lol

Ball State lost their QB for the year in the game after ours. His replacement was bad. I know it's so insane we would lose our first road game in 3 years with an entirely new team. How utterly inexcusable

Edit: I guess you're trying to say that SMU was better than Ohio. Ohio would've blown SMU out too. You got the luck of the draw playing against a mostly coachless team. LT did what they were supposed to do in that game though so they should get credit



Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Uh...you lost to Charlotte... no offense to our 49er bretheren.

(12-27-2017 07:05 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 06:48 PM)Shrack Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 05:39 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  I agree with that.

Those 8-4 teams in the west were fool's gold, Three blow-out bowl losses.
And their out of conference games were not any better. UNT blown out by SMU; UAB blown out by Ball State, and USM losing to Kentucky and Tennessee

Yep, and somehow LT managed to lose to all of us.

The West had harder bowl games.

Massey:

The East played: #73, #76, #79 #86, #107 = 84.2 average

The West played: #38, #47, #59, #62 = 51.5 average

I.E. Every single west bowl team played a more difficult game than every single East team. Drop the SMU game and it only makes it that much worse. CUSA east probably had the easiest bowl schedule for any division in college football if I had to guess without looking.

Why is FAU playing the 86th ranked team anyways.



Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

All by one point, field goals and extra points. That shows how inept Tech offense was this season. Of course the refs had more to do with the UAB game.

Holtz would contend that injuries had the most to do with the inexplicable losses but it was combination of both.

SMU was #59 while Ohio was #62. The blow-out losses to Sunbelt and MAC teams is inexcusable

The CUSA referees need to quit screwing over its good teams --like LA Tech-- during the regular season, because the bad teams ultimately get exposed during bowl games. Three CUSA teams that LA Tech lost to during the regular season --UAB, UNT and USM-- have all looked like crap during bowl season, and lost big. And not ironically, LA Tech was the victim of very poor officiating in each of those games. For example, LA Tech went into the UAB game averaging only 3 penalties a game, but was miraculously flagged for 10 penalties for over 100 yards against UAB. It was nothing short of highway robbery.

But these bowl games prove that these bad CUSA teams that receive protection from the CUSA refs during the regular season can't take the poor refs with 'em at bowl time. And they get exposed in bowl games. Meanwhile, LA Tech finally got fair officiating treatment in the Frisco Bowl, and performed big. And as most of you know, we do it EVERY YEAR during bowl season.

(12-27-2017 07:43 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 07:39 PM)Shrack Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 07:05 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 06:48 PM)Shrack Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 05:39 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  I agree with that.

Those 8-4 teams in the west were fool's gold, Three blow-out bowl losses.
And their out of conference games were not any better. UNT blown out by SMU; UAB blown out by Ball State, and USM losing to Kentucky and Tennessee

Yep, and somehow LT managed to lose to all of us.

The West had harder bowl games.

Massey:

The East played: #73, #76, #79 #86, #107 = 84.2 average

The West played: #38, #47, #59, #62 = 51.5 average

I.E. Every single west bowl team played a more difficult game than every single East team. Drop the SMU game and it only makes it that much worse. CUSA east probably had the easiest bowl schedule for any division in college football if I had to guess without looking.

Why is FAU playing the 86th ranked team anyways.



Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

All by one point, field goals and extra points. That shows how inept Tech offense was this season. Of course the refs had more to do with the UAB game.

Holtz would contend that injuries had the most to do with the inexplicable losses but it was combination of both.

SMU was #59 while Ohio was #62. The blow-out losses to Sunbelt and MAC teams is inexcusable

Lol

Ball State lost their QB for the year in the game after ours. His replacement was bad. I know it's so insane we would lose our first road game in 3 years with an entirely new team. How utterly inexcusable

Edit: I guess you're trying to say that SMU was better than Ohio. Ohio would've blown SMU out too. You got the luck of the draw playing against a mostly coachless team. LT did what they were supposed to do in that game though so they should get credit



Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Uh...you lost to Charlotte... no offense to our 49er bretheren.

No doubt. I wasn't boasting about UAB. We won games we shouldn't have and lost games we shouldn't have. We won a ton of close matchups and we were a very weak 8-4 with seriously no depth on the team. Hearing someone complain about our how we did in a bowl game is funny though because we weren't picked to even win 2 games for the year and yet were 3 points away from being undefeated in the West.

It is more an inditement of the West not being good.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Hog, that's some stupidity.
Are you drunk, or just retarded?

(12-27-2017 07:45 PM)HogDawg Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 07:05 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 06:48 PM)Shrack Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 05:39 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  I agree with that.

Those 8-4 teams in the west were fool's gold, Three blow-out bowl losses.
And their out of conference games were not any better. UNT blown out by SMU; UAB blown out by Ball State, and USM losing to Kentucky and Tennessee

Yep, and somehow LT managed to lose to all of us.

The West had harder bowl games.

Massey:

The East played: #73, #76, #79 #86, #107 = 84.2 average

The West played: #38, #47, #59, #62 = 51.5 average

I.E. Every single west bowl team played a more difficult game than every single East team. Drop the SMU game and it only makes it that much worse. CUSA east probably had the easiest bowl schedule for any division in college football if I had to guess without looking.

Why is FAU playing the 86th ranked team anyways.



Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

All by one point, field goals and extra points. That shows how inept Tech offense was this season. Of course the refs had more to do with the UAB game.

Holtz would contend that injuries had the most to do with the inexplicable losses but it was combination of both.

SMU was #59 while Ohio was #62. The blow-out losses to Sunbelt and MAC teams is inexcusable

The CUSA referees need to quit screwing over its good teams --like LA Tech-- during the regular season, because the bad teams ultimately get exposed during bowl games. Three CUSA teams that LA Tech lost to during the regular season --UAB, UNT and USM-- have all looked like crap during bowl season, and lost big. And not ironically, LA Tech was the victim of very poor officiating in each of those games. For example, LA Tech went into the UAB game averaging only 3 penalties a game, but was miraculously flagged for 10 penalties for over 100 yards against UAB. It was nothing short of highway robbery.

But these bowl games prove that these bad CUSA teams that receive protection from the CUSA refs during the regular season can't take the poor refs with 'em at bowl time. And they get exposed in bowl games. Meanwhile, LA Tech finally got fair officiating treatment in the Frisco Bowl, and performed big. And as most of you know, we do it EVERY YEAR during bowl season.

Yes, everyone knows. La. Tech is always the victim. Freaking CUAB and their corrupt officiating

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

(12-27-2017 07:46 PM)Shrack Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 07:43 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 07:39 PM)Shrack Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 07:05 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 06:48 PM)Shrack Wrote:  Yep, and somehow LT managed to lose to all of us.

The West had harder bowl games.

Massey:

The East played: #73, #76, #79 #86, #107 = 84.2 average

The West played: #38, #47, #59, #62 = 51.5 average

I.E. Every single west bowl team played a more difficult game than every single East team. Drop the SMU game and it only makes it that much worse. CUSA east probably had the easiest bowl schedule for any division in college football if I had to guess without looking.

Why is FAU playing the 86th ranked team anyways.



Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

All by one point, field goals and extra points. That shows how inept Tech offense was this season. Of course the refs had more to do with the UAB game.

Holtz would contend that injuries had the most to do with the inexplicable losses but it was combination of both.

SMU was #59 while Ohio was #62. The blow-out losses to Sunbelt and MAC teams is inexcusable

Lol

Ball State lost their QB for the year in the game after ours. His replacement was bad. I know it's so insane we would lose our first road game in 3 years with an entirely new team. How utterly inexcusable

Edit: I guess you're trying to say that SMU was better than Ohio. Ohio would've blown SMU out too. You got the luck of the draw playing against a mostly coachless team. LT did what they were supposed to do in that game though so they should get credit



Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Uh...you lost to Charlotte... no offense to our 49er bretheren.

No doubt. I wasn't boasting about UAB. We won games we shouldn't have and lost games we shouldn't have. We won a ton of close matchup and we were a very weak 8-4 with seriously no depth on the team. Hearing an someone complain about our how we did in a bowl game is funny though because we weren't picked to even win 2 games for the year and yet were 3 points away from being undefeated in the West.

It is more an inditement of the West not being good.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Fair enough Shrack. I, for one, was thrilled with UAB this year. So, my apologies for being a little snarky... I was just defending the east... Good season though.

(12-27-2017 07:47 PM)Noodles Wrote:  Hog, that's some stupidity.
Are you drunk, or just retarded?

I knew THAT post would get a rise out of a few of you guys!

But --in my OPINION-- it's very true. I've never seen a game as poorly officiated as the Tech-UAB game this past season. Just criminal. And in the long run, it doesn't do CUSA any good come bowl time.....as we have now WITNESSED for ourselves.

(12-27-2017 07:50 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 07:46 PM)Shrack Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 07:43 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 07:39 PM)Shrack Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 07:05 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  All by one point, field goals and extra points. That shows how inept Tech offense was this season. Of course the refs had more to do with the UAB game.

Holtz would contend that injuries had the most to do with the inexplicable losses but it was combination of both.

SMU was #59 while Ohio was #62. The blow-out losses to Sunbelt and MAC teams is inexcusable

Lol

Ball State lost their QB for the year in the game after ours. His replacement was bad. I know it's so insane we would lose our first road game in 3 years with an entirely new team. How utterly inexcusable

Edit: I guess you're trying to say that SMU was better than Ohio. Ohio would've blown SMU out too. You got the luck of the draw playing against a mostly coachless team. LT did what they were supposed to do in that game though so they should get credit



Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Uh...you lost to Charlotte... no offense to our 49er bretheren.

No doubt. I wasn't boasting about UAB. We won games we shouldn't have and lost games we shouldn't have. We won a ton of close matchup and we were a very weak 8-4 with seriously no depth on the team. Hearing an someone complain about our how we did in a bowl game is funny though because we weren't picked to even win 2 games for the year and yet were 3 points away from being undefeated in the West.

It is more an inditement of the West not being good.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Fair enough Shrack. I, for one, was thrilled with UAB this year. So, my apologies for being a little snarky... I was just defending the east... Good season though.

It's all good. We played like crap in our bowl game.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk