Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Programs that are sleeping giants
Author Message
Side Show Joe Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,488
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 165
I Root For: North Texas
Location: TEXAS
Post: #31
RE: Programs that are sleeping giants
(02-04-2018 08:29 AM)esayem Wrote:  A few that come to mind:


Colorado

UNLV

New Mexico

DePaul

Tennessee football (that one is easy)

North Texas or any of the mid-major public Texas schools

North Carolina football 04-wine

North Texas is certainly on the rise. The Mean Green finished last season 9-5, and set a new attendance record. QB Mason Fine who through for over 4,000 yards and more then 30 TDs is returning. Plus, he gets all three of his top receivers back too. If the terrible defense shows any improvement North Texas could be in for a very special season, and their third straight bowl.

North Texas basketball has also done a 180. After multiple seasons under Benford, in which the team never recorded a winning season, the Mean Green have a good coach and a respectable team. Currently UNT is tied for 3th in an improving C-USA conference, and sits 13-10 overall. Not a great record but, certainly a huge improvement over our previous 5 seasons.

North Texas is becoming one of the better G5 athletic programs in Texas. With around 40,000 students, 300,000 alumni, and located in the very large Dallas/Fort Worth media market, UNT is well positioned to emerge as a G5 power.
02-04-2018 03:20 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
_C2_ Offline
The King of Overanalysis
*

Posts: 18,067
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 356
I Root For: Houston
Location: Near Seawall Town
Post: #32
RE: Programs that are sleeping giants
(02-04-2018 02:27 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(02-04-2018 02:11 PM)bullet Wrote:  There are no sleeping giants in football. Other than the Florida schools, the teams at the top are the same teams you would see in the late 60s and early 70s.

Basketball where you only use 7-8 players is different.

Exactly. You have to reserve the term "Giant" for a team that has a chance to be a dominant force at the top level of football.

Probably the last prescient example of that was Bear Bryant's circa-1970 comment to the effect that if "they ever got their act together" down in Gainesville, Florida could be a dominant team.

There's nothing like that out there now.

Sure there is but it's a much smaller pool.
02-04-2018 03:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Love and Honor Offline
Skipper
*

Posts: 4,832
Joined: Nov 2012
Reputation: 126
I Root For: Miami, MACtion
Location: Chicagoland
Post: #33
RE: Programs that are sleeping giants
(02-04-2018 03:04 PM)_C2_ Wrote:  
(02-04-2018 12:13 PM)Love and Honor Wrote:  Miami. There's a reason we're historically the best football and basketball school in the MAC, our academics/campus/alumni wealth are unparalleled among conference peers while the 'Miami Valley' market (north Cincy suburbs up to Dayton) is ours for the taking again after we abandoned it when we decided to suck the last decade-plus in both revenue sports. We're still picking up the pieces from the mess our old AD left, but basketball is really turning around and football is no longer a doormat (it's just a matter of coaching at this point).

Not that MiamI University, the "U"niversity of Miami.

In terms of actual giants sure, there are inherent institutional factors that will keep us from being a real player in the college athletics world. But for G5 football or mid-major basketball the original Miami (founded a a few decades before Miami, FL and more than a century before The U), it's far from improbable. There's a reason all but one of the MAC's at-large bids were from Miami, why we're the Cradle of Coaches for football, why we went from some of the worst facilities in FBS five years ago to borderline P5 today. We're too far behind to make serious waves, but there's no reason we shouldn't be Toledo in football and what Akron has been for basketball this past decade at the minimum.
02-04-2018 03:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
_C2_ Offline
The King of Overanalysis
*

Posts: 18,067
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 356
I Root For: Houston
Location: Near Seawall Town
Post: #34
RE: Programs that are sleeping giants
(02-04-2018 02:48 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(02-04-2018 02:39 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  
(02-04-2018 02:27 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(02-04-2018 02:11 PM)bullet Wrote:  There are no sleeping giants in football. Other than the Florida schools, the teams at the top are the same teams you would see in the late 60s and early 70s.

Basketball where you only use 7-8 players is different.

Exactly. You have to reserve the term "Giant" for a team that has a chance to be a dominant force at the top level of football.

Probably the last prescient example of that was Bear Bryant's circa-1970 comment to the effect that if "they ever got their act together" down in Gainesville, Florida could be a dominant team.

There's nothing like that out there now.

using that metric...I'll throw out a program that has more resources than anyone else, but just hasn't been able to figure out how to apply them.....

Texas A&M

Yes but, TAMU is clearly a major player in the college football world. In the past 20 years, they've played in 4 Cotton Bowls and a Sugar Bowl. They are regularly ranked in the top 25, etc.

Given their resources, they are underachievers, sure. But i wouldn't call them "sleeping", which IMO implies a moribund program that is pretty much nowhere right now.

So shoot me for nit-picking all of this, LOL.

Oh come on, the Sugar Bowl was exactly 20 years ago (it happened January 1 of 1999 but whose counting?). Other than Johnny Football's big year, Texas A&M has been irrelevant, at least as a nationally relevant program.

That said, I agree with the other poster, you don't have to be some unknown or unheralded program to be a power.
02-04-2018 03:54 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bit_9 Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 6,982
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 118
I Root For: ODU
Location:
Post: #35
RE: Programs that are sleeping giants
If we didn't have state legislature pass a bill that impacted our ability and our administration would make some decisions a while ago about the new stadium we might be on this list.

Posted from mobile device. Hopefully it's coherent.
02-04-2018 04:35 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
esayem Offline
Hark The Sound!
*

Posts: 4,073
Joined: Feb 2007
Reputation: 121
I Root For: The Heels
Location: Tobacco Road
Post: #36
RE: Programs that are sleeping giants
(02-04-2018 02:48 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(02-04-2018 02:39 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  
(02-04-2018 02:27 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(02-04-2018 02:11 PM)bullet Wrote:  There are no sleeping giants in football. Other than the Florida schools, the teams at the top are the same teams you would see in the late 60s and early 70s.

Basketball where you only use 7-8 players is different.

Exactly. You have to reserve the term "Giant" for a team that has a chance to be a dominant force at the top level of football.

Probably the last prescient example of that was Bear Bryant's circa-1970 comment to the effect that if "they ever got their act together" down in Gainesville, Florida could be a dominant team.

There's nothing like that out there now.

using that metric...I'll throw out a program that has more resources than anyone else, but just hasn't been able to figure out how to apply them.....

Texas A&M

Yes but, TAMU is clearly a major player in the college football world. In the past 20 years, they've played in 4 Cotton Bowls and a Sugar Bowl. They are regularly ranked in the top 25, etc.

Given their resources, they are underachievers, sure. But i wouldn't call them "sleeping", which IMO implies a moribund program that is pretty much nowhere right now.

So shoot me for nit-picking all of this, LOL.

Ah yes, and they just hired Jackie Sherrill 2.0!
02-04-2018 05:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
esayem Offline
Hark The Sound!
*

Posts: 4,073
Joined: Feb 2007
Reputation: 121
I Root For: The Heels
Location: Tobacco Road
Post: #37
RE: Programs that are sleeping giants
(02-04-2018 01:23 PM)Soobahk40050 Wrote:  One thing not mentioned here:

Enrollment numbers

Liberty 110,000 (assuming this includes online, but means $$$)

Grand Canyon 71,000

UCF 69,000

FIU 60,000

Given time each of these has a chance.

Liberty. Forgot about them. I know Tommy Lazybrook said they won’t be the next BYU, but I bet they will. Every school that ever became successful had the willingness to spend money. Agree with their mission or not (personally I don’t), but they’re going to make it as an independent.
(This post was last modified: 02-04-2018 05:15 PM by esayem.)
02-04-2018 05:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
AppinVA Offline
Sun Belt Nationalist
*

Posts: 1,785
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 110
I Root For: Appalachian St.
Location:
Post: #38
RE: Programs that are sleeping giants
Ah, mother "Pimp My School" thread.
02-04-2018 05:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Mav Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 103
Joined: Jul 2016
Reputation: 5
I Root For: Omaha
Location:
Post: #39
RE: Programs that are sleeping giants
(02-04-2018 02:11 PM)bullet Wrote:  There are no sleeping giants in football. Other than the Florida schools, the teams at the top are the same teams you would see in the late 60s and early 70s.

Basketball where you only use 7-8 players is different.
Yeah, I mean, TCU, Oregon, and Wisconsin were so competitive back then, and Nebraska, Tennessee, and Colorado are doing so well. We might as well pack it in and accept Alabama running the sport until they try to outlaw football again.
Bad post. There's still room to rise and fall.
02-04-2018 05:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CliftonAve Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 11,914
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 332
I Root For: The Process
Location:
Post: #40
RE: Programs that are sleeping giants
(02-04-2018 05:42 PM)Mav Wrote:  
(02-04-2018 02:11 PM)bullet Wrote:  There are no sleeping giants in football. Other than the Florida schools, the teams at the top are the same teams you would see in the late 60s and early 70s.

Basketball where you only use 7-8 players is different.
Yeah, I mean, TCU, Oregon, and Wisconsin were so competitive back then, and Nebraska, Tennessee, and Colorado are doing so well. We might as well pack it in and accept Alabama running the sport until they try to outlaw football again.
Bad post. There's still room to rise and fall.

Yep, lots of examples. Add in Virginia Tech, Miami(FL), Louisville, etc. On the flip side schools like Pitt, Syracuse, Purdue and Minnesota were once powerhouses.

Fortunes change all the time
02-04-2018 06:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2018 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2018 MyBB Group.