Is Mach still here or has he passed out?

(02-13-2018 04:46 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-13-2018 04:23 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Daily Caller...once again missing the mark.

Comey's testimony...in context:

Quote:I felt compelled to document my first conversation with the President-Elect
in a memo. To ensure accuracy, I began to type it on a laptop in an FBI vehicle
outside Trump Tower the moment I walked out of the meeting. Creating written
records immediately after one-on-one conversations with Mr. Trump was my
practice from that point forward. This had not been my practice in the past. I
spoke alone with President Obama twice in person (and never on the phone) –
once in 2015 to discuss law enforcement policy issues and a second time, briefly,
for him to say goodbye in late 2016. In neither of those circumstances did I
memorialize the discussions. I can recall nine one-on-one conversations with
President Trump in four months – three in person and six on the phone.

He's clearly talking about 1:1 meetings with trump...and then Obama.

This was not a 1:1 meeting with Obama. Not to mention, Rice's e-mail is not clear on whether Comey was at the White House or on the phone.

Keep grasping for those straws guys!

Obama said he NEVER DISCUSSED investigations with the FBI & DOJ. He lied.

Did you read the email?

Quote:President Obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the Intelligence and law enforcement communities "by the book',. The President stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book.

He's not discussing anything about the investigation. Just mentioning that one exists is not discussing it.

It's amazing the stuff these knuckleheads come up with.....................

In a way you have to tip your cap at the delusion. It's spectacular.

(02-14-2018 08:28 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  It's amazing the stuff these knuckleheads come up with.....................

In a way you have to tip your cap at the delusion. It's spectacular.

So you offer only insults and then run from the assertions made and backed up with links. Got it.

WHAT????????

IN??????

THE??????
HECK??????

are you talking about. THEY DIDN"T START THE RUSSIAN INVESTIGATIONS TIL AFTER TRUMP WAS IN OFFICE!!! How can Obama have discussions about them. Did he get the flux capicator reved up? What was the source for the 1.2 gigajiga watts of power? You would have to know where lightning strikes?

Get a clue.

(02-13-2018 10:51 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Eight years of the Obama nightmare underscores your point. Im not sure he was competent in any aspect.

I was gonna say

we have several morons here who actually believe that Obama was and Killary would have been competent POTUS

we have several morons here who actually believe that Obama was and Killary would have been competent POTUS


Excellent rebuttal to Obama saying he did not discuss investigations................ Excellent Trumpkin

https://townhall.com/columnists/benshapi...l-n2448648
Press is normalizing nutty Democratic behavior and their own.

"...It's not just the media. This week, we learned that former FBI Director James Comey, former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, former national security adviser Susan Rice, former Vice President Joe Biden and former President Obama held a last-minute meeting at the White House to discuss the possibility of Trump-Russia collusion. At that meeting, Rice wrote in an email, Obama reportedly asked whether there was any reason "we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia." That means that Obama asked his top staff, including the FBI, whether he could hide intelligence information from the incoming Trump team.

That amounts to a massive breach in the constitutional structure. The FBI is not an independent agency. It is part of the executive branch. The incoming Trump administration was duly elected by the American people and had every right to see all intelligence information coming from the FBI and the CIA. Yet it was the supposedly normal Obama White House exploring means of preventing that transparency.
Trump isn't a normal president. But the threat to our institutions doesn't reside only at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. -- or even primarily there. It resides with those who are willing to side with any enemy and violate every rule in order to stop the supposed threat of Trump...."

Of course, the only ones known to have sided with the Russians to try to influence the election are the Hillary Clinton campaign and the FBI.

(02-13-2018 10:47 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(02-13-2018 10:37 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  You damn morons...... I asked for a link of him discussing investigations. Not him saying he didn’t discuss investigations.....

Clowns

Uh, actually, this is what you asked for:

(02-13-2018 05:12 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Link of Obama saying he never discussed....... you are taking something out of context. I guarantee it.

You have a very bad memory Mach.

No he doesn't. he's like my son when he was 8. He'd lie about some BS and then have to keep lying to cover his previous lie until it all collapsed on his little pea pickin head. He finally figured out - to his credit - that lying to me was never in his best interest and that it was always easier to just take whatever lumps came his way as a result of being truthful, lumps that were far fewer than the ones he took when caught lying.

Some day democrats will grow up too.

(02-13-2018 10:37 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  You damn morons...... I asked for a link of him discussing investigations. Not him saying he didn’t discuss investigations.....

Clowns

when you get proven wrong and put your foot in your mouth... START NAME CALLING! Face it mach, your posts are meaningless. You have lost all credibility in this forum.

(02-14-2018 09:10 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  WHAT????????

IN??????

THE??????
HECK??????

are you talking about. THEY DIDN"T START THE RUSSIAN INVESTIGATIONS TIL AFTER TRUMP WAS IN OFFICE!!! How can Obama have discussions about them. Did he get the flux capicator reved up? What was the source for the 1.2 gigajiga watts of power? You would have to know where lightning strikes?

Get a clue.

First FISA warrant issued on Carter Page on 19 October 2016. There had been, of course, an investigation beforehand that lead to seeking the warrant.

Are you just trolling us Mach?

(02-14-2018 09:56 AM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(02-14-2018 09:10 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  WHAT????????

IN??????

THE??????
HECK??????

are you talking about. THEY DIDN"T START THE RUSSIAN INVESTIGATIONS TIL AFTER TRUMP WAS IN OFFICE!!! How can Obama have discussions about them. Did he get the flux capicator reved up? What was the source for the 1.2 gigajiga watts of power? You would have to know where lightning strikes?

Get a clue.

First FISA warrant issued on Carter Page on 19 October 2016. There had been, of course, an investigation beforehand that lead to seeking the warrant.

Are you just trolling us Mach?

Mach didnt heed our advice and buckle up. So now he's brain damaged from being thrown head first through the windshield a few dozen times over the past couple of months.

(02-14-2018 09:57 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-14-2018 09:56 AM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(02-14-2018 09:10 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  WHAT????????

IN??????

THE??????
HECK??????

are you talking about. THEY DIDN"T START THE RUSSIAN INVESTIGATIONS TIL AFTER TRUMP WAS IN OFFICE!!! How can Obama have discussions about them. Did he get the flux capicator reved up? What was the source for the 1.2 gigajiga watts of power? You would have to know where lightning strikes?

Get a clue.

First FISA warrant issued on Carter Page on 19 October 2016. There had been, of course, an investigation beforehand that lead to seeking the warrant.

Are you just trolling us Mach?

Mach didnt heed our advice and buckle up. So now he's brain damaged from being thrown head first through the windshield a few dozen times over the past couple of months.

It's really odd. I recalled from last year that he made an attempt to engage in discussion of the issues. In this thread it appears to be all trolling. Kinda sad.

(02-14-2018 10:02 AM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(02-14-2018 09:57 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-14-2018 09:56 AM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(02-14-2018 09:10 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  WHAT????????

IN??????

THE??????
HECK??????

are you talking about. THEY DIDN"T START THE RUSSIAN INVESTIGATIONS TIL AFTER TRUMP WAS IN OFFICE!!! How can Obama have discussions about them. Did he get the flux capicator reved up? What was the source for the 1.2 gigajiga watts of power? You would have to know where lightning strikes?

Get a clue.

First FISA warrant issued on Carter Page on 19 October 2016. There had been, of course, an investigation beforehand that lead to seeking the warrant.

Are you just trolling us Mach?

Mach didnt heed our advice and buckle up. So now he's brain damaged from being thrown head first through the windshield a few dozen times over the past couple of months.

It's really odd. I recalled from last year that he made an attempt to engage in discussion of the issues. In this thread it appears to be all trolling. Kinda sad.

Some people just dont want to believe that "their guys" would do something that was 1000x worse than watergate.

Most transparent evah
not a smidgeon

One you have showed no evidence that they discussed these investigations. Only that Obama wanted it done by the book. Any reasonable person can see through your transparent argument. This is a really stupid stand to take.

(02-14-2018 10:47 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  One you have showed no evidence that they discussed these investigations. Only that Obama wanted it done by the book. Any reasonable person can see through your transparent argument. This is a really stupid stand to take.

Strojk to Page: Obama wants to see everything we are doing.

Is every meeting Obama had with Comey, a secret meeting? Does the same apply to Trump?

(02-14-2018 10:47 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  One you have showed no evidence that they discussed these investigations. Only that Obama wanted it done by the book. Any reasonable person can see through your transparent argument. This is a really stupid stand to take.

Quote:Rice wrote that Obama said "he wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/...n-day.html

What do you think she was saying Mach....that they discussed Russia but they didn't discuss the Russian investigation, the most important issue of the day? To believe that, one would have to be able to do this.

(02-14-2018 10:50 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  Is every meeting Obama had with Comey, a secret meeting? Does the same apply to Trump?

Just the ones Comey claims didn’t happen when he is spinning his lies to Congress. Why didn’t Comey leak his memo on that one? Maybe he was afraid it might trigger a special counsel. I wonder if Comey is somewhere hiding in those bushes that figure so prominently in the Obama portrait.

(02-14-2018 11:02 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(02-14-2018 10:50 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  Is every meeting Obama had with Comey, a secret meeting? Does the same apply to Trump?

Just the ones Comey claims didn’t happen when he is spinning his lies to Congress. Why didn’t Comey leak his memo on that one? Maybe he was afraid it might trigger a special counsel. I wonder if Comey is somewhere hiding in those bushes that figure so prominently in the Obama portrait.

Its hardly a "secret" meeting when there were multiple attendees at the meeting; and his sworn twstimony clearly stated he was referring to one-on-one meetings with the President.

Are you really clinging to this kind of twisted misinformation?