We know that one of the charges against McCabe, and the likely reason he was fired, was due to asking agents to change their 302's. (Witness interview reports. Basically he asked agents to lie on them) I had thought that it was the Clinton/Huma/Mills testimony that he had them change. (And maybe it was) But could it be that he also requested agents to lie on their 302's for the Flynn interview? Sounds like one agent decided to lie, and the other agent decided to report McCabes actions.
Kind of interesting timing too that Flynn's sentencing was suddenly postponed.
RE: McCabe had an agent change (lie) on Flynn's 302?
(02-14-2018 03:46 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: We know that one of the charges against McCabe, and the likely reason he was fired, was due to asking agents to change their 302's. (Witness interview reports. Basically he asked agents to lie on them) I had thought that it was the Clinton/Huma/Mills testimony that he had them change. (And maybe it was) But could it be that he also requested agents to lie on their 302's for the Flynn interview? Sounds like one agent decided to lie, and the other agent decided to report McCabes actions.
Kind of interesting timing too that Flynn's sentencing was suddenly postponed.
Yup.
There's a LOT more to this story yet to come out. Seems they (Feds) were leaning on him through threatening his son, he was out of $$$ and they were going to drag this out for potentially years.
Who wants to bet the prosecutor/Agent in this one was that total asshat Weisman or whatever his thrice overturned asss is.
This smelled dirty from the git, based on next to nothingness, and incoming NSA director can't talk Russian Gov't counterparts?!?
Hows that? I can talk to Russian Gov't officials, Security Advisor can't?
RE: McCabe had an agent change (lie) on Flynn's 302?
Starting to break elsewhere.
Also being reported that the delay in Flynn's sentencing is likely due over discovery, as Flynn's attornies have filed a motion pertaining to discovery.
“Due to the status of the Special Counsel’s investigation, the parties do not believe that this matter is ready to be scheduled for a sentencing hearing at this time,” the document, signed by Mueller and Flynn attorneys Robert Kelner and Stephen Anthony, said.
And on Wednesday, Flynn's team filed a protective order "governing the production of discovery."
It was originally reported by the libturd media that the delay in sentencing was no big deal, it happened all the time, and likely meant Flynn was further cooperating with Mueller.
But the latest discovery filing and motion to delay makes it appear there is a big problem and has nothing to do with Flynn's "cooperation."
RE: McCabe had an agent change (lie) on Flynn's 302?
(02-14-2018 04:31 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: Starting to break elsewhere.
Also being reported that the delay in Flynn's sentencing is likely due over discovery, as Flynn's attornies have filed a motion pertaining to discovery.
“Due to the status of the Special Counsel’s investigation, the parties do not believe that this matter is ready to be scheduled for a sentencing hearing at this time,” the document, signed by Mueller and Flynn attorneys Robert Kelner and Stephen Anthony, said.
And on Wednesday, Flynn's team filed a protective order "governing the production of discovery."
It was originally reported by the libturd media that the delay in sentencing was no big deal, it happened all the time, and likely meant Flynn was further cooperating with Mueller.
But the latest discovery filing and motion to delay makes it appear there is a big problem and has nothing to do with Flynn's "cooperation."
RE: McCabe had an agent change (lie) on Flynn's 302?
(02-14-2018 04:35 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:
(02-14-2018 04:31 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: Starting to break elsewhere.
Also being reported that the delay in Flynn's sentencing is likely due over discovery, as Flynn's attornies have filed a motion pertaining to discovery.
“Due to the status of the Special Counsel’s investigation, the parties do not believe that this matter is ready to be scheduled for a sentencing hearing at this time,” the document, signed by Mueller and Flynn attorneys Robert Kelner and Stephen Anthony, said.
And on Wednesday, Flynn's team filed a protective order "governing the production of discovery."
It was originally reported by the libturd media that the delay in sentencing was no big deal, it happened all the time, and likely meant Flynn was further cooperating with Mueller.
But the latest discovery filing and motion to delay makes it appear there is a big problem and has nothing to do with Flynn's "cooperation."
That whole "cooperation" ruse was another made-up fantasy-wish by the leftists and pom-pom waving loons in the complicit media.
Cooperating with what? That he made some phone calls? End of cooperation. Weak.
I'm sure you'd feel exactly the same if Obama placed someone he was warned was compromised as head of national security. The hypocrisy here really is astounding, if unsurprising.
RE: McCabe had an agent change (lie) on Flynn's 302?
(02-14-2018 04:51 PM)UCF08 Wrote: Yes, any minute now the most dishonest administration in modern history will be fully vindicated. This time it's for real guys! Clinton is going down!
RE: McCabe had an agent change (lie) on Flynn's 302?
The Democrat Russia Russia Russia fake narrative is now smoking from both engines and appears to be spiraling downward out of control into their own house of cards. This makes Watergate look like a minor little public intoxication. All roads lead to Obama. My guess is this will be carefully timed so Obama makes his perp walk in early November. Count on it.
(This post was last modified: 02-14-2018 07:29 PM by Attackcoog.)
RE: McCabe had an agent change (lie) on Flynn's 302?
I can't imagine what it must be like to be a dim these days. Every friggin' day a new, big, hot, steaming shyt sammich is served up. Oh well, at least they have that koolaid to wash 'em down.
RE: McCabe had an agent change (lie) on Flynn's 302?
(02-14-2018 04:54 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:
(02-14-2018 04:51 PM)UCF08 Wrote: Yes, any minute now the most dishonest administration in modern history will be fully vindicated. This time it's for real guys! Clinton is going down!
RE: McCabe had an agent change (lie) on Flynn's 302?
An FBI we can all be proud of, no? Ends justify the means.
I hope Flynn walks. Is it possible for someone in his position to sue the FBI, or is it your typical government-ruins-your-life-and-there-aint-squat-you-can-do-about-it story?
(This post was last modified: 02-19-2018 09:23 AM by TechRocks.)
/
McCabe had an agent change (lie) on Flynn's 302?
