Quote:Special counsel Robert Mueller's team is asking witnesses pointed questions about whether Donald Trump was aware that Democratic emails had been stolen before that was publicly known, and whether he was involved in their strategic release, according to multiple people familiar with the probe.

Mueller's investigators have asked witnesses whether Trump was aware of plans for WikiLeaks to publish the emails. They have also asked about the relationship between GOP operative Roger Stone and WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, and why Trump took policy positions favorable to Russia.

The line of questioning suggests the special counsel, who is tasked with examining whether there was collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia during the 2016 election, is looking into possible coordination between WikiLeaks and Trump associates in disseminating the emails, which U.S. intelligence officials say were stolen by Russia.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-...ls-n851941

That could get interesting if they squeeze Wikileaks only to be handed proof the emails came from Seth Rich.

(02-28-2018 06:41 PM)Claw Wrote:  That could get interesting if they squeeze Wikileaks only to be handed proof the emails came from Seth Rich.

I haven't a clue how they could squeeze wikileaks. But yes, that would be a funny thing in the end. The final shyte sammich so to speak.

The last thing the DNC wants is for someone to be indicted for the hacked servers.....

the defense would have the right to have the servers examined in the state they were when hacked. Not the file created by CrowdStrike.

If you can't introducer the severs then you can't enter the CrowdStrike report on those servers.....

without both you have zero evidence a crime was committed...even with the email made public.

He's been asking that question for close to 2 years.

(02-28-2018 08:08 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  He's been asking that question for close to 2 years.

Yeah, the fact that we've come full circle and are back to Roger Stone is pathetic. Shows that mueller is just chasing his tail at this point.

Stone's DMs with Wikileaks actually vindicate his testimony (Wikileaks: "false claims of association") that he had nothing to do with the leak, and he has also released a photo of his passport showing no foreign trips between 2010-2017, debunking the fake news that he met with Assange.

Not that any of that would be illegal..