RE: Question regarding reg. season champ/NIT auto-bid...
In the men's NIT, only the regular-season champion gets an automatic bid, and if they go to the NCAAs, then the bid goes away. Contrast this with the women's NIT, where every conference is guaranteed a bid (it goes to the top team in the conference standings that isn't playing in the NCAAs. Of course, the women's NIT has 64 spots so they have a lot more latitude to give even the lowest of the low-majors a team no matter what.
With regard to the third-line postseason tournaments, I think you're seeing a lot of teams take the NCAA, NIT or No Thanks approach. In the first year of the CBI, you had the likes of Virginia, Oregon, Washington State and Stanford participating, and of the first five champions, three were from power conferences (Oregon, Oregon State, Pitt), one was from CUSA 2.0 (Tulsa) and one was from a mid-major (VCU, which went to the Final Four the next season and eventually the A-10). Now, the last major-conference team to participate was Colorado in 2015, and the last one with at least a .500 record were Oregon State and Texas A&M in 2014. The majors stopped playing, and now the better mids are taking a pass. The CIT was created as a low/mid alternative to the CBI, but now their fields are indistinguishable -- if they can even fill a field.
I think in time the CBI and CIT will merge (or one will die and the other will take sole possession of the third tier), but it'd be better if the NIT followed the path of the WNIT and expanded with automatic entry for all conferences. There could still be that third tier tournament if the demand allows for it, like there is for women (the 16-team WBI).
|