(01-26-2022 04:04 PM)Seahawk Nation 08 Wrote: (01-26-2022 03:48 PM)B_Hawk06 Wrote: I could buy all of this...
until they put David Ortiz (had a positive test) in on his first ballot.
I don't think he should have been a 1st ballot guy either due to the PEDs, but I certainly don't think his resume was "borderline". 541 HR (17th all-time), career slash line of .286/.380/.552 over a 20-year career, 10x All-Star, 7x Silver Slugger, 2x Hank Aaron Award, 1x Babe Ruth Award and 1 WS MVP, plus a Roberto Clemente Award to boot. That's a locked in HOF resume.
Ortiz is a lock and Sosa is borderline. Let's take a look:
Ortiz:
541 HR (17th all-time), career slash line of .286/.380/.552 over a 20-year career, 10x All-Star, 7x Silver Slugger, 2x Hank Aaron Award, 1x Babe Ruth Award and 1 WS MVP
Sammy Sosa
609 HR (9th all-time), career slash of .273/.344/.534 over a 19-year career, 7x All-Star, 6x Silver Slugger, Hank Aaron Award along with Roberto Clemente Award and
NL MVP (he finished 2nd to Bonds during the 2001 season too.
Ortiz has slightly better numbers other than HR, and obviously he has post-season success. Watching Sammy carry Chicago to the playoffs in 1998 was arguably more impressive than any of Ortiz's post-season hits. I'm kidding, mostly, but he made a bad team relevant. Sammy never had a chance to hit in front of Manny Ramirez in a playoff series either.
Sosa also played a baseball position, 234 career SB, and has a higher career WAR (58>55). Things ended poorly for Sammy, in Chicago, and in general. I'm biased and I don't know how the corked bat effects things, but his resume is not borderline.