Always thought the ACC SEC rivalry week was cool or the Big 12 SEC basketball challenge and was wondering what a AAC SBU football one would look like.

UTSA/Texas State - already a thing - The I-35 Rivalry, stupid because UTSA main campus is off 1604 - UTSA leads 4-0

Tulane/LA - arguably the 2 coolest mascots - i dub thee The Bayou Bowl - Tulane leads 23-4

Memphis/ASU - already a thing - Paint Bucket Bowl - Memphis leads 31-23

UAB/Troy - regional pairing - I dub thee The Bama Bowl - Troy leads 7-5

USF/ Georgia State - regional pairing - I dub thee The Florida/Georgia Line Bowl A

FAU/Georgia Southern - regional pairing - I dub thee The Florida/Georgia Line Bowl B - Tied 1-1

ECU/Coastal Carolina - Regional Pairing - I dub thee The Brah Brouhaha

Charlotte/App State - Regional Pairing - I dub thee The City/Country Clash - App leads 3-0

SMU/Marshall - most recognizable brands - I dub thee The Brand Brawl - tied 2-2

Temple/ODU - regional pairing - I dub thee The ???

North Texas/ LA Monroe - eew pairing - eww scrimmage - LA Monroe leads 16-13 hahahaha

Navy/Southern Miss - Proudest Programs and Navy is always trying to recruit southern kids - i dub thee The Heritage Clash - Southern Miss leads 1-0

Rice/Southern Alabama - meh - meh melee

Tulsa/James Madison - great color combinations - ???

word of advice, the majority of posters here will take this as an insult

absolutely no one here will have interest in this

(02-10-2022 12:48 PM)pesik Wrote:  word of advice, the majority of posters here will take this as an insult

absolutely no one here will have interest in this

Which part is insulting?

I'm not the kind of person that needs affirmation by likes or responses. I'll live.

(02-10-2022 12:49 PM)UTSA_Alum Wrote:  

(02-10-2022 12:48 PM)pesik Wrote:  word of advice, the majority of posters here will take this as an insult

absolutely no one here will have interest in this

Which part is insulting?

I'm not the kind of person that needs affirmation by likes or responses. I'll live.

you are aware of the whole p6 thing?
0% chance the aac will do a challenge with the sunbelt.. that's basically an acknowledgement that you consider them an equal peer

the aac refused mwc/a10 challenges ..they wouldn't do a sunbelt challenge

Nope not interested.

(02-10-2022 12:49 PM)UTSA_Alum Wrote:  

(02-10-2022 12:48 PM)pesik Wrote:  word of advice, the majority of posters here will take this as an insult

absolutely no one here will have interest in this

Which part is insulting?

I'm not the kind of person that needs affirmation by likes or responses. I'll live.

It's bad enough that Charlotte, UTSA, FAU, and UNT are joining the conference. You want to lower it further by making the SBC our direct competition??? I hope SMU gets a lifeline fast!

(02-10-2022 12:49 PM)UTSA_Alum Wrote:  

(02-10-2022 12:48 PM)pesik Wrote:  word of advice, the majority of posters here will take this as an insult

absolutely no one here will have interest in this

Which part is insulting?

I'm not the kind of person that needs affirmation by likes or responses. I'll live.

The part where a P6 conference would stoop to a sanctioned competition with a G4

Nevertheless… no offense taken and solid creative post. Youve got several “gems in the rough”. Even though as Pesik alluded to, it would likely never happen in the real world, probably in any sport.

The SEC had the SEC-SoCon challenge and it was more of a cupcake weekend. It's concerning how misplaced most of you are about how others view the remaining schools in the AAC. Cindy and UFC were P6, Houston lucked out. If the rest of the schools were P6 they would have been offered by another conference in every round of realignment.

It's kinda sad that most of you are pretentious to the point that you think being "associated" with another conference will bring the AAC down. The SEC never had that issue because they back up their reputation with their performance on the field. You guys barely win but your concerned about reputation, attendance, and facilities.

You're revalent because your commissioner was smart to broker a deal with ESPN. Without that you would have been surpassed by conference USA and the sun belt but that's a hypothetical road i won't go down.

Clearly it was meant to be a silly hypothetical post but people being offended is s testament to the aforementioned pretentiousness

Navy is the only University to have any actual appeal. USF, SMU yeah ok

Disclaimer: fully aware of the grammatical errors and the incorrect use of contractions. Didn't care enough to fix them but this is the kind of argument where that will be eventually brought up.

(02-10-2022 12:21 PM)UTSA_Alum Wrote:  Always thought the ACC SEC rivalry week was cool or the Big 12 SEC basketball challenge and was wondering what a AAC SBU football one would look like.

UTSA/Texas State - already a thing - The I-35 Rivalry, stupid because UTSA main campus is off 1604 - UTSA leads 4-0

Tulane/LA - arguably the 2 coolest mascots - i dub thee The Bayou Bowl - Tulane leads 23-4

Memphis/ASU - already a thing - Paint Bucket Bowl - Memphis leads 31-23

UAB/Troy - regional pairing - I dub thee The Bama Bowl - Troy leads 7-5

USF/ Georgia State - regional pairing - I dub thee The Florida/Georgia Line Bowl A

FAU/Georgia Southern - regional pairing - I dub thee The Florida/Georgia Line Bowl B - Tied 1-1

ECU/Coastal Carolina - Regional Pairing - I dub thee The Brah Brouhaha

Charlotte/App State - Regional Pairing - I dub thee The City/Country Clash - App leads 3-0

SMU/Marshall - most recognizable brands - I dub thee The Brand Brawl - tied 2-2

Temple/ODU - regional pairing - I dub thee The ???

North Texas/ LA Monroe - eew pairing - eww scrimmage - LA Monroe leads 16-13 hahahaha

Navy/Southern Miss - Proudest Programs and Navy is always trying to recruit southern kids - i dub thee The Heritage Clash - Southern Miss leads 1-0

Rice/Southern Alabama - meh - meh melee

Tulsa/James Madison - great color combinations - ???

A for effort. Most of your AAC buds won't be interested. We'll have enough regional opportunities.

App has H/H scheduled with ECU and UNCC, which is the vast majority of our interest. I wouldn't mind scheduling a series with Navy if the opportunity presented itself.

I'm sure UTSA and TXST will play each other frequently. Hopefully TXST gets its ish together.

(02-10-2022 01:56 PM)UTSA_Alum Wrote:  The SEC had the SEC-SoCon challenge and it was more of a cupcake weekend. It's concerning how misplaced most of you are about how others view the remaining schools in the AAC. Cindy and UFC were P6, Houston lucked out. If the rest of the schools were P6 they would have been offered by another conference in every round of realignment.

It's kinda sad that most of you are pretentious to the point that you think being "associated" with another conference will bring the AAC down. The SEC never had that issue because they back up their reputation with their performance in the field. You guys barely win but your concerned about reputation, attendance, and facilities.

The only your revalent is because your commissioner was smart to broker a deal with ESPN. Without that you would have been surpassed by conference USA and the sun belt but that's a hypothetical road i won't go down.

Navy is the only University to have any actual appeal. USF, SMU yeah ok

Since you decided to take a pot shot at USF. Let me be clear for you.
USF’s nonconference schedule is booked until 2028, we are scheduled to play Florida,Miami, Note Dame, Alabama, Louisville, Boise,BYU, NCST in those years so no we are not interested or have rooms for SBC games.
Also you are showing ignorance regarding both USF and SMU to say they have no appeal.
Not a good way for you to start on this board.

(02-10-2022 01:56 PM)UTSA_Alum Wrote:  Houston lucked out.

LOL! Says the little meep meep after 1 fluke darling season.
You better hope UTSA hasn't shot its wad and suddenly sucks again or you'll be drawing even more wrath from the rest of the AAC teams that you inexplicably think you're suddenly superior to now because you lucked into an invite as a supposed "peer".

Everyone already has you figured out as a ****-stirring mini-troll.

(02-10-2022 01:56 PM)UTSA_Alum Wrote:  The SEC had the SEC-SoCon challenge and it was more of a cupcake weekend. It's concerning how misplaced most of you are about how others view the remaining schools in the AAC. Cindy and UFC were P6, Houston lucked out. If the rest of the schools were P6 they would have been offered by another conference in every round of realignment.

It's kinda sad that most of you are pretentious to the point that you think being "associated" with another conference will bring the AAC down. The SEC never had that issue because they back up their reputation with their performance in the field. You guys barely win but your concerned about reputation, attendance, and facilities.

The only your revalent is because your commissioner was smart to broker a deal with ESPN. Without that you would have been surpassed by conference USA and the sun belt but that's a hypothetical road i won't go down.

Navy is the only University to have any actual appeal. USF, SMU yeah ok

most of your take is ridiculous

sec-socon challeng was played at SEC stadiums ONLY... the sunbelt wouldn't Volunteer to be buy games for the aac ..and the aac wouldn't do a home and home with the sunbelt ..so that point is meaningless....

and yes, the AAC would do challenges with the swac before doing one with the sunbelt..there would be no confusion that we acknowledge them as equals..

a sunbelt/aac challenge is a vocal statement that we see them as equals especially with the g5 grouping.. it would make the p6 campaign make no sense at all.. the whole point is to group the aac with the p5

the aac without its espn deal would still have programs with double or triple the budgets of c-usa and sunbelt...another ridiculous point

uconn wasnt invited into any major conference and had more money than the majority of the p5.. they had o abandon football to get into the big eat.. realignment doesn't work on "who is worthy"

ps i remember you now, you're that weird utsa fan that kept making threads trying to justify Utsa Having a horrific basketball facilities

R1 research universities shouldn't put themselves on a peer level with four-year junior colleges.

Some of those matchups seem fun.

(02-10-2022 12:21 PM)UTSA_Alum Wrote:  Always thought the ACC SEC rivalry week was cool or the Big 12 SEC basketball challenge and was wondering what a AAC SBU football one would look like.

UTSA/Texas State - already a thing - The I-35 Rivalry, stupid because UTSA main campus is off 1604 - UTSA leads 4-0

Tulane/LA - arguably the 2 coolest mascots - i dub thee The Bayou Bowl - Tulane leads 23-4

Memphis/ASU - already a thing - Paint Bucket Bowl - Memphis leads 31-23

UAB/Troy - regional pairing - I dub thee The Bama Bowl - Troy leads 7-5

USF/ Georgia State - regional pairing - I dub thee The Florida/Georgia Line Bowl A

FAU/Georgia Southern - regional pairing - I dub thee The Florida/Georgia Line Bowl B - Tied 1-1

ECU/Coastal Carolina - Regional Pairing - I dub thee The Brah Brouhaha

Charlotte/App State - Regional Pairing - I dub thee The City/Country Clash - App leads 3-0

SMU/Marshall - most recognizable brands - I dub thee The Brand Brawl - tied 2-2

Temple/ODU - regional pairing - I dub thee The ???

North Texas/ LA Monroe - eew pairing - eww scrimmage - LA Monroe leads 16-13 hahahaha

Navy/Southern Miss - Proudest Programs and Navy is always trying to recruit southern kids - i dub thee The Heritage Clash - Southern Miss leads 1-0

Rice/Southern Alabama - meh - meh melee

Tulsa/James Madison - great color combinations - ???

Tulane should be paired with USM - that is a trophy game.

Memphis vs. Louisiana is actually a good SOS game that isn't SEC.

A lot of these are nondescript games.

I am not used to this new AAC. We added six and that tells me that more of us will be leaving at some point so I'm not going to get attached until we get the FINAL lineup in place.

AAC is in the business of distancing itself from G4. Not creating a long-term scheduling agreement with them.

What was Aresco's most recent statement... "much closer to the five than the four."

(02-10-2022 02:09 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(02-10-2022 01:56 PM)UTSA_Alum Wrote:  The SEC had the SEC-SoCon challenge and it was more of a cupcake weekend. It's concerning how misplaced most of you are about how others view the remaining schools in the AAC. Cindy and UFC were P6, Houston lucked out. If the rest of the schools were P6 they would have been offered by another conference in every round of realignment.

It's kinda sad that most of you are pretentious to the point that you think being "associated" with another conference will bring the AAC down. The SEC never had that issue because they back up their reputation with their performance in the field. You guys barely win but your concerned about reputation, attendance, and facilities.

The only your revalent is because your commissioner was smart to broker a deal with ESPN. Without that you would have been surpassed by conference USA and the sun belt but that's a hypothetical road i won't go down.

Navy is the only University to have any actual appeal. USF, SMU yeah ok

most of your take is ridiculous

sec-socon challenge and it was played at SEC stadiums ONLY... the sunbelt wouldnt voluntary to buy games for the aac ..and the aac wouldn't do a home and home with the sunbelt ..so that point is meaningless....

and yes, the AAC would do challenge with the swac before doing one with the sunbelt..there would be no confusion that we acknowledge them as equals..

a sunbelt/aac challenge is a vocal statement that we see them as equals especially with the g5 grouping.. it would make the p6 campaign make no sense at all.. the whole point is to group the aac with the p5

the aac without its espn deal would still have programs with double or triple the budgets of c-usa and sunbelt...another ridiculous point

uconn wasnt invited into any major conference and had more money than the majority of the p5.. they had o abandon football to get into the big eat.. realignment doesn't work on "who is worthy"

ps i remember you now, you're that weird utsa fan that kept making threads trying to justify Utsa Having a horrific basketball facilities

I love how you barely acknowledged anything i said but instead referenced budgets hahahahahaha yeah budgets equate to wins. I honestly couldn't care less if UTSA lost every game until the end of time. Why cant you guys understand that people can have opinions regardless of how their team is doing. Kinda hoping UH starts being bad so you arent allow to voice any opinions.

(02-10-2022 02:41 PM)UTSA_Alum Wrote:  Kinda hoping UH starts being bad so you arent allow to voice any opinions.

You want us to listen to your opinion, then get feelings hurt when we give ours? LOL

Hey, hope all you want. That and $5 will get you a nice starbucks latte.

Enjoy!

(02-10-2022 02:04 PM)Cubanbull1 Wrote:  

(02-10-2022 01:56 PM)UTSA_Alum Wrote:  The SEC had the SEC-SoCon challenge and it was more of a cupcake weekend. It's concerning how misplaced most of you are about how others view the remaining schools in the AAC. Cindy and UFC were P6, Houston lucked out. If the rest of the schools were P6 they would have been offered by another conference in every round of realignment.

It's kinda sad that most of you are pretentious to the point that you think being "associated" with another conference will bring the AAC down. The SEC never had that issue because they back up their reputation with their performance in the field. You guys barely win but your concerned about reputation, attendance, and facilities.

The only your revalent is because your commissioner was smart to broker a deal with ESPN. Without that you would have been surpassed by conference USA and the sun belt but that's a hypothetical road i won't go down.

Navy is the only University to have any actual appeal. USF, SMU yeah ok

Since you decided to take a pot shot at USF. Let me be clear for you.
USF’s nonconference schedule is booked until 2028, we are scheduled to play Florida,Miami, Note Dame, Alabama, Louisville, Boise,BYU, NCST in those years so no we are not interested or have rooms for SBC games.
Also you are showing ignorance regarding both USF and SMU to say they have no appeal.
Not a good way for you to start on this board.

I'm aware of non conference games being set 10+ years in advance, it was a hypothetical post snow flake, or should i say jeff scott or michael kelly...

(02-10-2022 12:21 PM)UTSA_Alum Wrote:  Always thought the ACC SEC rivalry week was cool or the Big 12 SEC basketball challenge and was wondering what a AAC SBU football one would look like.