No thread about her testimony today? So shocking.

yawn.

Not shocking at all. Seeing as how most citizens of this country are not paying any attention at all to the Kangaroo court proceedings, the fact that they think they have some bombshell 'evidence' of something by calling an aide to Meadows doesn't register at all. It's a non story, except to the libs and progs that infest the formerly "main stream" media, who are breathlessly pushing it like it is really important.

We're tired of liberal B.S., including sham hearings of a political body that is only trying to build a narrative. Folks saw through that even before their 'hearings' began. Nobody watched. Nobody cares about liberal B.S. except those pushing it or repeating dim talking points.

literally who?

Is there evidence or more hearsay

(06-28-2022 01:09 PM)gdunn Wrote:  Is there evidence or more hearsay

She was party to the conversations so not hearsay.

(06-28-2022 01:10 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote:  

(06-28-2022 01:09 PM)gdunn Wrote:  Is there evidence or more hearsay

She was party to the conversations so not hearsay.

OH.. So she has recordings, photos, videos, you know.. Evidence.

(06-28-2022 01:11 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(06-28-2022 01:10 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote:  

(06-28-2022 01:09 PM)gdunn Wrote:  Is there evidence or more hearsay

She was party to the conversations so not hearsay.

OH.. So she has recordings, photos, videos, you know.. Evidence.

Or at least meetings' minutes logs...right? Otherwise, it's hearsay, which should be deemed inadmissible.

(06-28-2022 01:11 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(06-28-2022 01:10 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote:  

(06-28-2022 01:09 PM)gdunn Wrote:  Is there evidence or more hearsay

She was party to the conversations so not hearsay.

OH.. So she has recordings, photos, videos, you know.. Evidence.

https://twitter.com/steve_vladeck/status...3059508224
It's not hearsay.

Knew the ******* numbnuts wouldn't understand **** about hearsay.

(06-28-2022 01:14 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote:  

(06-28-2022 01:11 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(06-28-2022 01:10 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote:  

(06-28-2022 01:09 PM)gdunn Wrote:  Is there evidence or more hearsay

She was party to the conversations so not hearsay.

OH.. So she has recordings, photos, videos, you know.. Evidence.

https://twitter.com/steve_vladeck/status...3059508224
It's not hearsay.

*sees that he works for CNN* Well, that's all I need to know.

Next.

Literally nobody but people who will always vote Demoncrat gives a damn. Either send agents to perp walk the former President of the United States or STFU and enjoy your political porn.

(06-28-2022 01:16 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote:  Knew the ******* numbnuts wouldn't understand **** about hearsay.

What this dumb*** Steve Vladeck doesn't quite grasp is that this is not a trial. It is a political show for idiots. Like yourself.

It's fitting that Steve 'works' for such a reputable outfit as CNN.

(06-28-2022 01:14 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote:  

(06-28-2022 01:11 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(06-28-2022 01:10 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote:  

(06-28-2022 01:09 PM)gdunn Wrote:  Is there evidence or more hearsay

She was party to the conversations so not hearsay.

OH.. So she has recordings, photos, videos, you know.. Evidence.

https://twitter.com/steve_vladeck/status...3059508224
It's not hearsay.

She’s testifying on completely partisan committee [all Dems and two Dem-appointed Republican hacks). She doesn’t have to worry about perjury as these investigators wouldn’t test her testimony

Until they have a couple of people on the committee from the other side and are allowed to cross examine, this is nothing more than worthless political theater.

oh geez, add Tennis guy to Tom's hoodwinked circlejerk.

(06-28-2022 01:14 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote:  

(06-28-2022 01:11 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(06-28-2022 01:10 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote:  

(06-28-2022 01:09 PM)gdunn Wrote:  Is there evidence or more hearsay

She was party to the conversations so not hearsay.

OH.. So she has recordings, photos, videos, you know.. Evidence.

https://twitter.com/steve_vladeck/status...3059508224
It's not hearsay.

So she has evidence? See how this works. I mean by your logic I can take you to court and sue you for millions based on the fact that you slandered me. I don't need proof or evidence, my word is good enough.

https://twitter.com/mchalfant16/status/1...9597868032

Tweets from leftist do not constitute them as law scholars..

Geez.

(06-28-2022 01:20 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  Until they have a couple of people on the committee from the other side and are allowed to cross examine, this is nothing more than worthless political theater.

Here's the testimony so far:

She heard from someone that Trump, sitting in the back of his motorcade car, tried to grab the steering wheel of the car.

Let me go ahead and put this out as a Level 3 Hoodwink alert for those who are low iq, and a level 5 alert for the few of you who are low iq and low T.


Yea, we really needed another thread on this today, to go along with the other one out there that Tennis couldnt find.