random asian guy
All American
Posts: 3,271
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation: 342
I Root For: VT, Georgetown
Location:
|
RE: Your final P2 predicted configurations
(07-22-2022 05:16 PM)Fighting Muskie Wrote: (07-21-2022 12:24 PM)random asian guy Wrote: (07-20-2022 10:54 PM)Big 12 fan too Wrote: (07-20-2022 02:39 PM)random asian guy Wrote: SEC: Same 16 teams. It’s already a super conference with UT and OU.
BIG: 20 teams including
Rutgers, Maryland, Penn State, Ohio State, Michigan, MSU, Notre Dame, Indiana, Purdue, Illinois, Northwestern, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Nebraska, USC, UCLA, Stanford, FSU, GT
What is the rationale for FSU (and GT) getting to the BIG without the SEC getting anything and the ACC not losing anymore despite now being less valuable?
like, how does that get executed? Or is this a 2037 forecast?
The SEC is complete with 16 because there is no one out there that can increase the SEC’s payout.
The next target schools have to generate more viewers/revenue than the average SEC school. That would be A&M/Tenn in terms of football viewership. (Bama, GA, FL, LSU, Auburn, UT and OU are ahead of them and the others are behind them).
Let’s see which ACC/Pac/B12 schools are clearly better than A&M and Tenn? I don’t see any. Clemson and FSU may be similar but not clearly better. Why would the ESPN/SEC need to add two more average schools (for the SEC standard) that are located in their territory?
The BIG is different. They are clearly more market driven than the SEC. The ESPN is a nationwide network but the BTN is not. It’s beneficial for the BIG if the BIG adds a team in a major markek and local cable companies in that major market start carrying the BTN.
From another posting of mine (https://csnbbs.com/thread-950295.html):
Below is the media market ranking.
(https://newsgeneration.com/broadcast-res...o-markets/)
1 New York, NY
2 Los Angeles, CA
3 Chicago, IL
4 Philadelphia, PA
5 Dallas-Ft. Worth, TX
6 San Francisco-Oak-San Jose
7 Atlanta
8 Houston, TX
9 Washington (Hagerstown), DC-MD
10 Boston (Manchester)
11 Phoenix (Prescott)
12 Seattle-Tacoma
13 Tampa-St. Pete (Sarasota)
14 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN
15 Detroit, MI
16 Denver, CO
17 Orlando-Daytona Beach-Melbourne, FL
18 Miami-Ft. Lauderdale, FL
19 Cleveland-Akron (Canton), OH
20 Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA
21 Portland, OR
22 Charlotte, NC
23 St. Louis, MO
24 Raleigh-Durham (Fayetteville), NC
25 Indianapolis, IN
With USC/UCLA on board, the BIG will have foothold in #1,#2, #3, #4 and #9. They could have gotten #5 and #8 if UT headed to the BIG. If ND decides to join, then Stanford would be the obvious media pick for #6 market.
If the ACC schools are available, UNC, UVa, and Duke are not good candidates at least for the BTN cable. The BIG already has the cable provider for the Washington DC area, which is the UVa’s biggest market. UVa/Duke’s market would be #22 and #24 and it was reported that #12 seattle market might not be enough for the BIG to invite UW.
I would say the better candidates are actually GT with #7 Atlanta market and Florida school for #13, #17, and #18 media market
There’s a lot of rationale behind that strategy.
ND, FSU, Miami, and GT make a lot of sense and I think having a foot in those 3 big FL markets (plus Jacksonville) is better than adding Stanford, who doesn’t actually own the Bay market.
Miami might be better than FSU.
ND may be able to get out of the ACC before other ACC schools. If BIG wants to add ND right away and Stanford is available, I don’t think the BIG would wait for other ACC schools.
|
|