(02-28-2024 03:56 PM)XLance Wrote: I keep scratching my head as to why you got rid of Chan. He got an awful lot out of not much to work with.
It's a great question, and I have some memories of it.
Chan was given a bad hand to start, and it only got worse in the first year. O'Leary kept up with the players' academic progress pretty well and Chan handed that off to administrative personnel at the GTAA and a year later that ended up costing us a lot of good talent that O'Leary had recruited. GT was down to like 64 or 65 scholarship players at the start of the 2003 season, the returning quarterbacks were mediocre at best, and the schedule was daunting. Chan went all in a true-freshman quarterback and it kinda worked in 2003. A 7-6 record including a nice bowl win wasn't expected at the start of the season.
2004 had a lot of ups and downs but we got a new receiver who just tore up everything he faced. Some guy who ended up in the NFL and did well. Some good wins and some head scratching losses.
2005 was another year with some ups and downs. Toward the end of the year the NCAA lowered the hammer and hit the institute with sanctions. The year still ended okay, a massive upset of Miami in Miami knocked Larry Coker down a lot that he never recovered.
2006 was the peak. Senior quarterback, all-world wide receiver, NFL-caliber running back, and a 9-2 start had everything looking great. ...and then came crashing down in Athens in a loss against a struggling UGA in full rebuilding mode. A highly disappointing loss in Jacksonville to Wake Forest the following week (a 9-6 score that still stands as a serious WTF? moment) and an entertaining but ultimately a bowl loss to West Virginia left GT with a 9-5 record.
I will say that Gailey turned up recruiting very well during that 2006 season. Yes I remember who did a lot of the work of this class, along with others. That 2007 signing day was one of GT's best.
The 2007 season felt... mediocre at best. Relying on the quarterback who couldn't beat out Reggie Ball in practice left us with little offense to work with. A 27-3 loss to VT on a Thursday night in Atlanta earned him boos when his PSA came on the jumbotron. Another loss to UGA basically felt like we never going to beat them with Gailey at the helm. A 7-5 record got him sent packing.
Chan's record at GT? 7-6, 7-6, 7-5, 7-5, 9-5, 7-5 (before the bowl game). 0-6 against UGA with some god-awful blowouts and a few close calls. But it felt like he was going to have five losses a year no matter what he did. Chan was an offensive guy and his defenses were what kept GT competitive. I'll give him credit for putting the better players on defense and letting the DC (Jon Tenuta) run that side without much interference.
Now a great "What if?" question would concern how GT would have done with Chan at the helm in 2008. There was a lot of talent on that team on both sides of the ball. But would it have been enough to win in Athens? Could he have gotten GT to the upper levels of the ACC like we were consistently under O'Leary? I mean, if we're going to compare him to coach Clown Shoes then sure, I'd take Gailey in a heartbeat. But it did feel like we could do better than 5 losses a year and that was Chan's ceiling.