C2__
Caltex2
Posts: 23,652
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 561
I Root For: Houston, PVAMU
Location: Zamunda
|
Those of you touting San Antonio as a leader to land an MLB franchise, think again
https://www.sacurrent.com/news/is-san-an...RI6UQsG4WM
What really stood out to me was that more than 18% of the city's residents live at or below the poverty line. Because of this 1/5 not owning many TV's (or almost for certain, cable/satellite) it doesn't even have an MLS franchise, which is almost unthinkable given how soccer mad the city is.
I think the MLB would work in SA if not now then eventually because the city is growing by leaps and bounds (almost as much as Houston and DFW), has a directly adjacent metro area without a team to draw fans from that's connected via freeway and is very Hispanic, which means many of them can relate to numerous MLB players and may play the game themselves or follow closely.
(This post was last modified: 03-09-2024 08:58 AM by C2__.)
|
|
03-09-2024 07:51 AM |
|
chargeradio
Vamos Morados
Posts: 7,505
Joined: Mar 2007
Reputation: 128
I Root For: ALA, KY, USA
Location: Louisville, KY
|
RE: Those of you touting San Antonio as a leader to land an MLB franchise, think again
The poverty rate isn't actually as high as some existing MLB cities. Where San Antonio (and Austin) lose out is that all of Texas is spoken for by the Rangers' and Astros' TV territories. As that model fades out, that may allow a third MLB team in Texas.
Austin is doing better in terms of attracting high net worth individuals and companies capable of corporate sponsorships.
Both San Antonio and Austin will likely be passed over this round. Nashville and Salt Lake have made the most moves in terms of securing land, funding, etc. Even Portland is ahead of them in that regard.
|
|
03-10-2024 08:04 AM |
|
C2__
Caltex2
Posts: 23,652
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 561
I Root For: Houston, PVAMU
Location: Zamunda
|
RE: Those of you touting San Antonio as a leader to land an MLB franchise, think again
(03-10-2024 08:04 AM)chargeradio Wrote: The poverty rate isn't actually as high as some existing MLB cities. Where San Antonio (and Austin) lose out is that all of Texas is spoken for by the Rangers' and Astros' TV territories. As that model fades out, that may allow a third MLB team in Texas.
Austin is doing better in terms of attracting high net worth individuals and companies capable of corporate sponsorships.
Both San Antonio and Austin will likely be passed over this round. Nashville and Salt Lake have made the most moves in terms of securing land, funding, etc. Even Portland is ahead of them in that regard.
I would assume those cities' suburbs are much richer, old money suburbs.
|
|
03-10-2024 05:00 PM |
|
Renandpat
1st String
Posts: 1,157
Joined: May 2017
Reputation: 35
I Root For: Central State
Location:
|
RE: Those of you touting San Antonio as a leader to land an MLB franchise, think again
How long as San Antonio and Bexar County balked on even building a AA or AAA Park? Ten to 12 years?
The small local TV revenue is a true matter to overcome as @chargerradio eluded to.
|
|
03-10-2024 08:28 PM |
|
C2__
Caltex2
Posts: 23,652
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 561
I Root For: Houston, PVAMU
Location: Zamunda
|
RE: Those of you touting San Antonio as a leader to land an MLB franchise, think again
And with the RSN cable model going belly up FTMP, just how much revenue could you make in San Antonio alone? Now maybe if the ballpark is in the North of San Antonio or it's northern suburbs (where most of the wealth in the city is), they may be able to partner with Austin a little bit and expand their market.
But with just San Antonio alone, they have little chance because they wouldn't be able to make enough TV money.
|
|
03-11-2024 01:12 AM |
|