Cincinnati Bearcats

Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
UC vs. San Francisco
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
Bear Catlett Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,976
Joined: Jan 2020
Reputation: 1544
I Root For: UC
Location:
Post: #221
RE: UC vs. San Francisco
(03-22-2024 03:16 PM)Captain Bearcat Wrote:  
(03-21-2024 10:19 PM)ZCat Wrote:  
(03-21-2024 04:22 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  I think it was 9 games that we lost by 5 points or less.

So if just two of the multitude of missed 3's in each of those games go in, we would have been 27-4.

Twenty seven... and... four. We're probably at least a 2 seed. THIS team.

And we're a spoiled fan for being frustrated???? Come on, man.
I respectfully disagree. If we are playing a little bit better, the other team clamps down and also focuses better. We were inferior than several of those teams so I could see us winning two of them but the other ones it would be a crapshoot.

It's not just that. It's also that his statistics are ignoring the close games we won.

In regular season games that were within one possession (3 points) at the end of regulation, we went 5-3.

Howard - won in OT
Texas - lost by 1
Baylor - lost by 3
TCU - won in OT
Texas Tech - won by 3
UCF - won by 2
Kansas State - won by 2
Oklahoma - lost in OT

OK...

Make two more three pointers in EVERY game and we don't go to OT with Howard and TCU and beat everybody else by six more points.

We're not talking about a lot here. It's a mere two shots a game that would have drastically changed our season.
 
03-22-2024 03:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UCBearcatlawjd2 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,460
Joined: Nov 2014
Reputation: 46
I Root For: UC
Location:
Post: #222
RE: UC vs. San Francisco
A lot of the game UC played that were close had no business being close. Howard, @WVU, @UCF, @OU, and Oklahoma State, and San Francisco were all games that needed to be closed out without things hectic at the end. Two games WVU in KC and home vs TCU the Cats has no business winning considering how much they were down at times. The rest pretty much were true coin flip type games that I don’t feel UC or the opponent were clearly the better team that day.
 
03-22-2024 03:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Captain Bearcat Offline
All-American in Everything
*

Posts: 9,509
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 768
I Root For: UC
Location: IL & Cincinnati, USA
Post: #223
RE: UC vs. San Francisco
(03-22-2024 03:29 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  
(03-22-2024 03:16 PM)Captain Bearcat Wrote:  
(03-21-2024 10:19 PM)ZCat Wrote:  
(03-21-2024 04:22 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  I think it was 9 games that we lost by 5 points or less.

So if just two of the multitude of missed 3's in each of those games go in, we would have been 27-4.

Twenty seven... and... four. We're probably at least a 2 seed. THIS team.

And we're a spoiled fan for being frustrated???? Come on, man.
I respectfully disagree. If we are playing a little bit better, the other team clamps down and also focuses better. We were inferior than several of those teams so I could see us winning two of them but the other ones it would be a crapshoot.

It's not just that. It's also that his statistics are ignoring the close games we won.

In regular season games that were within one possession (3 points) at the end of regulation, we went 5-3.

Howard - won in OT
Texas - lost by 1
Baylor - lost by 3
TCU - won in OT
Texas Tech - won by 3
UCF - won by 2
Kansas State - won by 2
Oklahoma - lost in OT

OK...

Make two more three pointers in EVERY game and we don't go to OT with Howard and TCU and beat everybody else by six more points.

We're not talking about a lot here. It's a mere two shots a game that would have drastically changed our season.

Two shots a game is huge.

We averaged 7.32 for 22.62 on 3-pointers per game, which is 32.4%. 2 more made shots would be 41.2%.

Only three teams in the country shot better than 40% from 3: Kentucky, Purdue, and Dayton.

You're saying that if we were #1 in the country rather than #264 in 3-point shooting, we would have won more games.

Well yeah, I guess that's true. But you're acting as if that's just a small tweak. In reality, it would require a fundamental change in the quality of any team's roster to make such a huge change.
 
03-22-2024 05:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ZCat Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,020
Joined: Sep 2018
Reputation: 31
I Root For: UC
Location:
Post: #224
RE: UC vs. San Francisco
(03-22-2024 08:56 AM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  
(03-21-2024 10:19 PM)ZCat Wrote:  
(03-21-2024 04:22 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  I think it was 9 games that we lost by 5 points or less.

So if just two of the multitude of missed 3's in each of those games go in, we would have been 27-4.

Twenty seven... and... four. We're probably at least a 2 seed. THIS team.

And we're a spoiled fan for being frustrated???? Come on, man.
I respectfully disagree. If we are playing a little bit better, the other team clamps down and also focuses better. We were inferior than several of those teams so I could see us winning two of them but the other ones it would be a crapshoot.

Wait, ...what??

Isn't that what they already did???

Are you the guy who once said that missed free throws don't affect the outcome of a game because it would change the flow of the game from there on if you made them???

Of course not. That’s ridiculous. What I said was accurate. People Oversimplify it. Oh if we could’ve just scored four more baskets. Well same goes for both teams.
 
03-22-2024 08:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bww Offline
McCuse
*

Posts: 5,014
Joined: Mar 2005
Reputation: 153
I Root For: Bearcats
Location: Cincinnati
Post: #225
RE: UC vs. San Francisco
Like run an efficient alley oop? They were better in the last couple of weeks, but just wasting good possessions up until
 
03-22-2024 09:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bearcatmark Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 30,837
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation: 806
I Root For: the Deliverator
Location:
Post: #226
RE: UC vs. San Francisco
(03-22-2024 09:45 PM)bww Wrote:  Like run an efficient alley oop? They were better in the last couple of weeks, but just wasting good possessions up until

I've seen three major issues that have missed up our oops, two we can control.

1. Inaccurate passes. For example, day Day sailed at least one, jizzle threw one that barely got above the rim and was right by the rim).

2. Sometimes when the throw isn't great Aziz tries to make the difficult finish instead of just landing and jumping. The back ward tip late in the last game is probably the most extreme example but there have been so many times this year where the throw is off for whatever reason but close enough that he could just land and go back up and he tries a near impossible finish.

3. Refs have let land shove Aziz in mid air far too many times. Feels like that's a back they make so often but aziz almost never gets and it happens all the time.
 
03-22-2024 09:55 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UCGrad1992 Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 31,915
Joined: Sep 2013
Reputation: 2297
I Root For: Bearcats U
Location: North Carolina
Post: #227
RE: UC vs. San Francisco
I don't know if anyone has mentioned this but we have to get better at taking care of the ball from the PG position. Day Day is currently ranked 252nd in NCAA assist/turnover ratio. 116 assists. 74 turnovers. 1.57. Some of his lazy passes and losing the ball in traffic is mind numbing. Give me a point guard who scores a bit less but takes care of the ball and gets the ball where it needs to be consistently. I hope this kid is kept locked in the gym during the offseason and works on this part of his game.

Simas is even worse ranked 273rd. 99 assists. 66 turnovers. 1.50

As a team, Cincinnati is ranked 125th. Not a surprise from what we've witnessed this season.
 
03-22-2024 10:55 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UCBearcatlawjd2 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,460
Joined: Nov 2014
Reputation: 46
I Root For: UC
Location:
Post: #228
RE: UC vs. San Francisco
(03-22-2024 10:55 PM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  I don't know if anyone has mentioned this but we have to get better at taking care of the ball from the PG position. Day Day is currently ranked 252nd in NCAA assist/turnover ratio. 116 assists. 74 turnovers. 1.57. Some of his lazy passes and losing the ball in traffic is mind numbing. Give me a point guard who scores a bit less but takes care of the ball and gets the ball where it needs to be consistently. I hope this kid is kept locked in the gym during the offseason and works on this part of his game.

Simas is even worse ranked 273rd. 99 assists. 66 turnovers. 1.50

As a team, Cincinnati is ranked 125th. Not a surprise from what we've witnessed this season.

That seems like a both a reflection of the players and Wes. This team needed better ball handling but also a coach the micromanages the game. For Wes to be very successful he is going to need a true floor general out there. A coach on the court type of player that can take care of the ball and play smart.

Since Wes isn’t going to become Mick Cronin and basically call the game from the sidelines the need for talented high basketball IQ player becomes even more necessary. I would say only Simas and Newman come close to that in your main rotation. Jizzle might get there but the rest of your core roster while talented lacks the experience and basketball savvy needed to lead this team next season.
 
03-23-2024 07:42 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
OKIcat Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,673
Joined: Sep 2015
Reputation: 191
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location:
Post: #229
RE: UC vs. San Francisco
(03-23-2024 07:42 AM)UCBearcatlawjd2 Wrote:  
(03-22-2024 10:55 PM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  I don't know if anyone has mentioned this but we have to get better at taking care of the ball from the PG position. Day Day is currently ranked 252nd in NCAA assist/turnover ratio. 116 assists. 74 turnovers. 1.57. Some of his lazy passes and losing the ball in traffic is mind numbing. Give me a point guard who scores a bit less but takes care of the ball and gets the ball where it needs to be consistently. I hope this kid is kept locked in the gym during the offseason and works on this part of his game.

Simas is even worse ranked 273rd. 99 assists. 66 turnovers. 1.50

As a team, Cincinnati is ranked 125th. Not a surprise from what we've witnessed this season.

That seems like a both a reflection of the players and Wes. This team needed better ball handling but also a coach the micromanages the game. For Wes to be very successful he is going to need a true floor general out there. A coach on the court type of player that can take care of the ball and play smart.

Since Wes isn’t going to become Mick Cronin and basically call the game from the sidelines the need for talented high basketball IQ player becomes even more necessary. I would say only Simas and Newman come close to that in your main rotation. Jizzle might get there but the rest of your core roster while talented lacks the experience and basketball savvy needed to lead this team next season.

Bolded, this is far more important than making a couple more baskets each game in determining if next year's team will advance from good to great. DayDay brings some excellent skills and most here believe Jizzle possesses incredible upside. But will either be ready eight short months from now to be the floor general?

If Newman can't score again today and if Vik doesn't log some minutes and get a couple baskets I don't see a win over Bradley today.
 
03-23-2024 08:55 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.