bill dazzle
Craft beer and urban living enthusiast
Posts: 10,710
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 979
I Root For: Vandy/Memphis/DePaul/UNC
Location: Nashville
|
RE: The immediate realignment pivot points
(04-17-2024 09:41 AM)8993 Wrote: (04-17-2024 09:10 AM)bill dazzle Wrote: (04-17-2024 06:23 AM)GreenBison Wrote: (04-16-2024 01:40 PM)andybible1995 Wrote: (04-16-2024 12:00 PM)bill dazzle Wrote: As a member of the Nashville media with some indirect connections to WKU sports, I have heard nothing about talks between WKU and the MAC. That's not to say such talks are not happening.
WKU is better suited overall (culturally, geographically and rivalries, in particular) for C-USA than the MAC.
I don't anticipate WKU leaving. But who knows?
I agree on the C-USA being the better fit for WKU than the MAC. I would take it a step further and say why settle for the MAC when you can pair up with MTSU for a possible move the AAC in the future if that conference gets raided again.
WKU doesn't fit the Market model that the AAC covets, so I doubt they get in. It's not impossible, but just like Marshall and App State, WKU doesn't fit the AAC market first approach (sorry you're the odd man out ECU). And there's nothing wrong with that.
Depending on how many (if any) members the AAC loses, the league may have no choice but to abandon its previous approach of focusing on schools located in large cities. Of course, if the AAC loses, say, four members, it will have been so wounded that it might not be very attractive to those schools with a chance to join the league — thus making any AAC model rather moot.
This might be a hot take, but I see jumping to the MAC or staying in CUSA as a better option than jumping to the AAC for WKU.
I know money is the biggest factor in any and all conversations regarding college athletics, but one of the primary things I heard frequently from CUSA 3.0 members (Southern Miss, Louisiana Tech, Marshall, Rice, UTEP, FIU, FAU, MTSU, WKU, UNT, ODU, UTSA, UAB, Charlotte) was that the conference lacked an identity and traditional rivalries. Why jump back into a conference with those very programs?
This isn't a knock on any of those programs in particular, but the AAC is now CUSA 3.5 and it still doesn't have the identity and traditional rivalries. If I were in WKU's shoes, I'd either stick it out in CUSA and develop those rivalries and hope for more money, jump ship to the MAC to try a new culture altogether, or wait to see if a spot opens up in the SBC where you can build those traditional rivalries back up. At the end of the day, the money of the AAC would be too nice to say no to, but still, I'm just not sure I see what the other upside is here for WKU. Additionally, they don't fit the AAC culture, so that's just an odd next step.
The AAC "identity" (if it has one) is derived from the league's members offering urban locations and a balance of football and men's basketball. But that "AAC identity" is modest at best (and, yes, the rivalries are lacking, notwithstanding Army vs. Navy in football).
The reason WKU would be interested in joining the AAC is to share a league (for the first time in school history) with "basketball-first schools" Wichita, Tulsa, Memphis and Temple and to be aligned in football with Army and Navy. Western offers a strong men's hoops history. And though C-USA has some programs with very solid traditions (like New Mexico State and UTEP), I would think WKU would prefer the AAC for basketball purposes. Maybe I'm wrong.
|
|