+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: Lounge (/forum-564.html)
+---- Forum: The Sports Bar (/forum-531.html)
+---- Thread: The Sugar Bowl (/thread-338064.html)
The Sugar Bowl - ETSUfan1 - 01-02-2009 08:25 PM
I know its early, but that looked easy enough.
7-0 Utah.
RE: The Sugar Bowl - ETSUfan1 - 01-02-2009 08:33 PM
14-0 Utah
8 mins left 1st quarter
RE: The Sugar Bowl - ETSUfan1 - 01-02-2009 08:52 PM
21-0 Utah
1st Quarter
RE: The Sugar Bowl - Rebel - 01-02-2009 09:21 PM
I would love a rematch with Alabama. Doubt it would turn out the same.
RE: The Sugar Bowl - ETSUfan1 - 01-02-2009 09:22 PM
So what happens if this holds up? I'd say Utah finishes #2.
RE: The Sugar Bowl - Rebel - 01-02-2009 09:31 PM
(01-02-2009 09:22 PM)ETSUfan1 Wrote: So what happens if this holds up? I'd say Utah finishes #2.
It won't hold up. Saban is calculating. He needed a feel for Utah and he now has it. Utah will not win this game.
RE: The Sugar Bowl - Terpy - 01-02-2009 10:18 PM
(01-02-2009 09:31 PM)Rebel Wrote:(01-02-2009 09:22 PM)ETSUfan1 Wrote: So what happens if this holds up? I'd say Utah finishes #2.
It won't hold up. Saban is calculating. He needed a feel for Utah and he now has it. Utah will not win this game.
you are the most predictable poster on this board.
RE: The Sugar Bowl - Rebel - 01-02-2009 10:28 PM
(01-02-2009 10:18 PM)Terpy Wrote:(01-02-2009 09:31 PM)Rebel Wrote:(01-02-2009 09:22 PM)ETSUfan1 Wrote: So what happens if this holds up? I'd say Utah finishes #2.
It won't hold up. Saban is calculating. He needed a feel for Utah and he now has it. Utah will not win this game.
you are the most predictable poster on this board.
You think I'm a homer? I called wins for ECU (Kentucky), BC (Vanderbilt), and GT (LSU).
I lost points on all.
Fact is, Saban is a winner. He knows how to win.
RE: The Sugar Bowl - ETSUfan1 - 01-02-2009 10:30 PM
So youre saying youre not that good at picking games?!
28-17 Utes
RE: The Sugar Bowl - Rebel - 01-02-2009 10:34 PM
(01-02-2009 10:30 PM)ETSUfan1 Wrote: So youre saying youre not that good at picking games?!
28-17 Utes
I picked Ole Miss. BTW, I didn't see ETSU in any bowls. Did I miss it?
RE: The Sugar Bowl - ETSUfan1 - 01-02-2009 10:40 PM
You must have. We've been undefeated since 2003.
RE: The Sugar Bowl - Terpy - 01-02-2009 10:49 PM
(01-02-2009 10:28 PM)Rebel Wrote:(01-02-2009 10:18 PM)Terpy Wrote:(01-02-2009 09:31 PM)Rebel Wrote:(01-02-2009 09:22 PM)ETSUfan1 Wrote: So what happens if this holds up? I'd say Utah finishes #2.
It won't hold up. Saban is calculating. He needed a feel for Utah and he now has it. Utah will not win this game.
you are the most predictable poster on this board.
You think I'm a homer? I called wins for ECU (Kentucky), BC (Vanderbilt), and GT (LSU).
I lost points on all.
Fact is, Saban is a winner. He knows how to win.
I knew exactly what you were going to post when I saw you were the last poster to post on this thread.
This is a classic trap game. Utah has everything to play for and Alabama has virtually nothing.
If Saban was really as much of a "winner" as you say he is he would have found a way to beat a Florida team which was basically a one man team.
RE: The Sugar Bowl - ETSUfan1 - 01-02-2009 10:56 PM
After watching the 3rd quarter, nothing leads me to believe Bammer can win this game. Utah wins this one and the BCS looks about as dumb as it gets AGAIN.
RE: The Sugar Bowl - Rebel - 01-02-2009 10:58 PM
(01-02-2009 10:49 PM)Terpy Wrote: If Saban was really as much of a "winner" as you say he is he would have found a way to beat a Florida team which was basically a one man team.
Yeah, Harvin, Ingram, Rainey, and Murphy are such non-issues. Shall I now move on to defensive guys?
My God, Tebow's good, but he isn't friggin' superman.
RE: The Sugar Bowl - Terpy - 01-02-2009 11:00 PM
(01-02-2009 10:58 PM)Rebel Wrote:(01-02-2009 10:49 PM)Terpy Wrote: If Saban was really as much of a "winner" as you say he is he would have found a way to beat a Florida team which was basically a one man team.
Yeah, Harvin, Ingram, Rainey, and Murphy are such non-issues. Shall I now move on to defensive guys?
My God, Tebow's good, but he isn't friggin' superman.
HARVIN DIDNT PLAY IN THE SEC CHAMPIONSHIP GAME MORON
RE: The Sugar Bowl - Rebel - 01-02-2009 11:09 PM
(01-02-2009 11:00 PM)Terpy Wrote:(01-02-2009 10:58 PM)Rebel Wrote:(01-02-2009 10:49 PM)Terpy Wrote: If Saban was really as much of a "winner" as you say he is he would have found a way to beat a Florida team which was basically a one man team.
Yeah, Harvin, Ingram, Rainey, and Murphy are such non-issues. Shall I now move on to defensive guys?
My God, Tebow's good, but he isn't friggin' superman.
HARVIN DIDNT PLAY IN THE SEC CHAMPIONSHIP GAME MORON
Damn, such harsh language. Hey "Moron", Jeremy Shockey didn't play in the Super Bowl last year either, gonna say he didn't matter to their season?
RE: The Sugar Bowl - ETSUfan1 - 01-02-2009 11:13 PM
If Utah wins this game, the definitely should feel cheated.
RE: The Sugar Bowl - SouthGAEagle - 01-02-2009 11:16 PM
(01-02-2009 10:28 PM)Rebel Wrote:(01-02-2009 10:18 PM)Terpy Wrote:(01-02-2009 09:31 PM)Rebel Wrote:(01-02-2009 09:22 PM)ETSUfan1 Wrote: So what happens if this holds up? I'd say Utah finishes #2.
It won't hold up. Saban is calculating. He needed a feel for Utah and he now has it. Utah will not win this game.
you are the most predictable poster on this board.
You think I'm a homer? I called wins for ECU (Kentucky), BC (Vanderbilt), and GT (LSU).
I lost points on all.
Fact is, Saban is a winner. He knows how to win.
He must know something I don't know, because I thought the last place you'd want to be is to be on defense, down by 11, with less than 9 minutes to play if you're planning to win.... ;-)
RE: The Sugar Bowl - flyingswoosh - 01-02-2009 11:16 PM
(01-02-2009 11:09 PM)Rebel Wrote:(01-02-2009 11:00 PM)Terpy Wrote:(01-02-2009 10:58 PM)Rebel Wrote:(01-02-2009 10:49 PM)Terpy Wrote: If Saban was really as much of a "winner" as you say he is he would have found a way to beat a Florida team which was basically a one man team.
Yeah, Harvin, Ingram, Rainey, and Murphy are such non-issues. Shall I now move on to defensive guys?
My God, Tebow's good, but he isn't friggin' superman.
HARVIN DIDNT PLAY IN THE SEC CHAMPIONSHIP GAME MORON
Damn, such harsh language. Hey "Moron", Jeremy Shockey didn't play in the Super Bowl last year either, gonna say he didn't matter to their season?
umm, he didnt. he was one of the most overrated TE's in football. He had a bad attitude, ran poor routes and doesn't have very good hands. I would say one of the reasons this team won was because shockey got hurt.
RE: The Sugar Bowl - Terpy - 01-02-2009 11:17 PM
(01-02-2009 11:09 PM)Rebel Wrote:(01-02-2009 11:00 PM)Terpy Wrote:(01-02-2009 10:58 PM)Rebel Wrote:(01-02-2009 10:49 PM)Terpy Wrote: If Saban was really as much of a "winner" as you say he is he would have found a way to beat a Florida team which was basically a one man team.
Yeah, Harvin, Ingram, Rainey, and Murphy are such non-issues. Shall I now move on to defensive guys?
My God, Tebow's good, but he isn't friggin' superman.
HARVIN DIDNT PLAY IN THE SEC CHAMPIONSHIP GAME MORON
Damn, such harsh language. Hey "Moron", Jeremy Shockey didn't play in the Super Bowl last year either, gonna say he didn't matter to their season?
Jeremy Shockey was and is a team cancer they were 100% better off without him.
BUT THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS.
I was talking about the SEC CHAMPIONSHIP GAME, nothing else.
That should have been very clear in my post.