+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: CUSAbbs (/forum-514.html)
+---- Forum: CUSA Conference Talk (/forum-439.html)
+---- Thread: NCAA's First RPI Ranking (/thread-836143.html)
NCAA's First RPI Ranking - MT FAN - 12-04-2017 04:10 PM
MT 6
LA Tech 16
Western KY 34
Old Dominion 65
FAU 175
UTEP 232
NT 243
UTSA 257
Marshall 263
UAB 268
FIU 292
Rice 301
Southern Miss 308
Charlotte 310
Charlotte has been a big disappointment in basketball since the conference formed. Why are you guys so bad with your decent history?
RE: NCAA's First RPI Ranking - Niner National - 12-04-2017 04:56 PM
(12-04-2017 04:10 PM)MT FAN Wrote: MT 6
LA Tech 16
Western KY 34
Old Dominion 65
FAU 175
UTEP 232
NT 243
UTSA 257
Marshall 263
UAB 268
FIU 292
Rice 301
Southern Miss 308
Charlotte 310
Charlotte has been a big disappointment in basketball since the conference formed. Why are you guys so bad with your decent history?
Judy rose keeps hiring bad coaches.
RE: NCAA's First RPI Ranking - TribeNiner - 12-04-2017 05:07 PM
(12-04-2017 04:56 PM)Niner National Wrote:(12-04-2017 04:10 PM)MT FAN Wrote: MT 6
LA Tech 16
Western KY 34
Old Dominion 65
FAU 175
UTEP 232
NT 243
UTSA 257
Marshall 263
UAB 268
FIU 292
Rice 301
Southern Miss 308
Charlotte 310
Charlotte has been a big disappointment in basketball since the conference formed. Why are you guys so bad with your decent history?
Judy rose keeps hiring bad coaches.
And gives them no institutional support.
RE: NCAA's First RPI Ranking - TribeNiner - 12-04-2017 05:10 PM
(12-04-2017 05:07 PM)TribeNiner Wrote:(12-04-2017 04:56 PM)Niner National Wrote:(12-04-2017 04:10 PM)MT FAN Wrote: MT 6
LA Tech 16
Western KY 34
Old Dominion 65
FAU 175
UTEP 232
NT 243
UTSA 257
Marshall 263
UAB 268
FIU 292
Rice 301
Southern Miss 308
Charlotte 310
Charlotte has been a big disappointment in basketball since the conference formed. Why are you guys so bad with your decent history?
Judy rose keeps hiring bad coaches.
And gives them no institutional support.
How far we've fallen:
![[Image: 6yf6DmL.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/6yf6DmL.jpg)
RE: NCAA's First RPI Ranking - usm99 - 12-04-2017 05:23 PM
(12-04-2017 04:10 PM)MT FAN Wrote: MT 6
LA Tech 16
Western KY 34
Old Dominion 65
FAU 175
UTEP 232
NT 243
UTSA 257
Marshall 263
UAB 268
FIU 292
Rice 301
Southern Miss 308
Charlotte 310
Charlotte has been a big disappointment in basketball since the conference formed. Why are you guys so bad with your decent history?
Hopefully, but that's a big hopeful, USM can slowly start to improve now that the Tyndall sanctions are in the final stage I believe with the scholarship reductions. If I am correct we should be back to full amounts next year but at least the post season bans are in the past (yes, we were eligible last year but that was first year after the 2 year ban). I'm not expecting much this year but with only 1 senior on the roster who averages about 4 points in his 23 minutes or so a game things should get better we hope along with getting some more scholarship bodies instead of the 6-1 power forward walk-on
RE: NCAA's First RPI Ranking - freshtop - 12-04-2017 10:37 PM
(12-04-2017 05:10 PM)TribeNiner Wrote:(12-04-2017 05:07 PM)TribeNiner Wrote:(12-04-2017 04:56 PM)Niner National Wrote:(12-04-2017 04:10 PM)MT FAN Wrote: MT 6
LA Tech 16
Western KY 34
Old Dominion 65
FAU 175
UTEP 232
NT 243
UTSA 257
Marshall 263
UAB 268
FIU 292
Rice 301
Southern Miss 308
Charlotte 310
Charlotte has been a big disappointment in basketball since the conference formed. Why are you guys so bad with your decent history?
Judy rose keeps hiring bad coaches.
And gives them no institutional support.
How far we've fallen:
Your post got me thinking about our RPI over the years. I found this site that has the data for each season/team.
http://www.collegerpi.com/subs/cgi/tmrpihist.cgi?T272
Man we were on a roll from Felton to Horn (from 00-01 to 08-09 we finished with an RPI over 100 once during a coaching transition). Then McDonald put us in dumpster and Harper couldn't get us out of it (still finished with RPI ratings better than 200, but we were the definition of mediocre). Hopefully we can maintain this hot start we have had to the season.
RE: NCAA's First RPI Ranking - MonarchManiac - 12-04-2017 11:25 PM
Well looks like everyone will be 150+ once conference play starts. Joy.
Sent from my SM-G930V using CSNbbs mobile app
RE: NCAA's First RPI Ranking - beefcake0520 - 12-05-2017 03:35 PM
(12-04-2017 05:10 PM)TribeNiner Wrote:(12-04-2017 05:07 PM)TribeNiner Wrote:(12-04-2017 04:56 PM)Niner National Wrote:(12-04-2017 04:10 PM)MT FAN Wrote: MT 6
LA Tech 16
Western KY 34
Old Dominion 65
FAU 175
UTEP 232
NT 243
UTSA 257
Marshall 263
UAB 268
FIU 292
Rice 301
Southern Miss 308
Charlotte 310
Charlotte has been a big disappointment in basketball since the conference formed. Why are you guys so bad with your decent history?
Judy rose keeps hiring bad coaches.
And gives them no institutional support.
How far we've fallen:
I remember watching the CUSA 1.0 games, you guys had quite the rivalry with Cincy, very well respected program yall had at that time.