Why did Big Ten payouts vary so much? - Printable Version +- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com) +-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html) +--- Forum: Big10bbs (/forum-259.html) +---- Forum: Big 10 Conference Talk (/forum-167.html) +---- Thread: Why did Big Ten payouts vary so much? (/thread-850651.html) |
Why did Big Ten payouts vary so much? - Hokie Mark - 05-26-2018 09:36 AM From NJ.com: Here's a look at the school-by-school distribution from the Big Ten in 2016-17: Wisconsin: $44.3 million Maryland: $37.3 million Illinois: $36.3 million Michigan: $35.2 million Indiana: $35 million Purdue: $34.7 million Minnesota: $33.9 million Iowa: $33.5 million Ohio State: $33.1 million Michigan State: $32.9 million Penn State: $31.5 million Nebraska: $24.7 million Rutgers: $16.1 million Q: Why the huge differences (other than Rutgers - I get that one)? Is this due to that ticket revenue sharing thing I've heard about? Can anyone explain it? http://www.nj.com/rutgersfootball/index.ssf/2018/04/michigan_and_ohio_state_rake_in_185m_which_big_ten.html RE: Why did Big Ten payouts vary so much? - TerpsNPhoenix - 05-27-2018 06:12 AM (05-26-2018 09:36 AM)Hokie Mark Wrote: From NJ.com: Here's a look at the school-by-school distribution from the Big Ten in 2016-17: Rutgers, Maryland, Nebraska still buying in. I believe this is Nebraska's last year as a partial. Maryland (even though they have the 2nd highest disbursement) is still buying in but front loaded their contract. I don't have the answers for the others. Eleven Warriors forum asking the same thing. One of the best responses from there : BrutusB - "Big Ten does equal distribution of TV and bowl money, then each school gets to keep most of its own gate receipts and merchandise money. I'm guessing the article conflated a few things as "Big Ten" money." |