(12-24-2013 11:33 AM)BJUnklFkr Wrote:  

(12-23-2013 11:12 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  

(12-23-2013 01:10 PM)Lou_C Wrote:  

(12-23-2013 11:31 AM)BJUnklFkr Wrote:  I apologize if this was already posted here (I didn't see it), but I thought this BC post was freaking hilarious

http://www.bcinterruption.com/acc-expans...t-proposal

That's good stuff.

What's precious is the moronic BC poster comments thinking it was legit.

Tex, the whole thing looked sarcastic to me, but just my opinion.

The real funny thing is this: Keep in mind, there are a lot of Cincy supporters who are paranoid/overly hopeful about realignment these days. This "article" was linked on another Cincy board (which is pretty much how I "found" it), and the guy who posted it actually did think it was legit.

Then he started complaining like, "oh no, now UL is going to play in PBS and pee in our pool." No. I doubt UL is going to move ACC home games to Nashville, Indy and Cincinnati

Perhaps they were under the impression that UL still played football in the old baseball stadium/cracker-jack box? I can see ND moving a game with Louisville to Indianapolis, Cincinnati, St. Louis, or Chicago, and calling it a Shamrock Game.

It's unfortunate for Syracuse that their AD spoke out of turn and via email on the subject. The likelihood of the ACC making a change to satisfy Syracuse in football is probably less than one percent. And as far as the "urban" exposure issue goes I don't think anyone south of Pittsburg PA cares much about Syracuse football, with the possible exception of NY expats in the Miami area.

Very little happens in the ACC unless you quietly align your votes before the fact, once things become public, inertia sets in.