(10-16-2016 04:33 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  

(10-16-2016 04:26 PM)acc4life Wrote:  

(10-16-2016 04:17 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  

(10-16-2016 02:47 AM)Savacool Wrote:  Did you mean Boise State? We do not want them in the AAC in my humble opinion. Their program has gone downhill fast. I cannot watch a game on a blue playing field! Bring on BYU,Army,Air Force or even Colorado State.

Yeah bsu has gone downhill lol. They turned down this conference because of TooLame taking sdsu with them. Umass, niu etc will be the pool of teams added to the AAC if anyone. It's a shame the AAC couldn't add any more mwc teams and settled on more cusa schools. It killed the perception of a best of the rest conference.

No, it didn't; every talking head on TV agrees that the AAC is the best G5 conference. We already have a scheduling agreement with BYU and if Aresco can get a network to guarantee, let's say 10 million, if two of the four aforementioned schools come aboard, it could happen.

You think a scheduling agreement with byu is special lol. Byu is a de facto member of the mwc with how many games they play against mwc. And how did bsu get the access bowl out in 2014? Why are the tv deals so similar? The mwc has been the best G5 leage for so long it's nice to have some competition. This leage ain't getting 10 million a year or 5. Why would they?

You're freaking nutso, if you think the MWC is better than the AAC team for team. All you have is Boise and Air Force, that's it (and occasionally SDSU); we normally have 5 decent teams in football and basketball every year.