(04-03-2018 11:04 AM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-03-2018 08:44 AM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(04-03-2018 12:36 AM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-02-2018 09:11 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(04-02-2018 08:53 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  Exactly, you cut and paste but don’t see the contradiction you pasted. A sheep.

Okay, I'll play. What's contradictory about first investigate, then dismantle?

You said hownthey could conclude something in advance. I am asking why investigate if you have already concluded it should be dismantled?

Okay, I think I'm seeing the problem here. You're having trouble with those big words and taking this to a logical conclusion. Lemme help. And while what I'm saying represents my own opinion, I suspect I'm not far off from the author's opinion as well.

The first assumption that is made is that something is broken, or wrong at the FBI. That's called a conclusion. Here's the definition of the word:

Quote:the end or finish of an event or process. a judgment or decision reached by reasoning

Based on events over the last year, using reasoning, many people have concluded that the FBI has become politicized. Many also believe that a politicized FBI, like a politicized IRS, or politicized DOJ, is not good for America, not good for any American, ever. Those are powerful institutions, and when they become politicized, they are even more powerful weapons against one's political enemies.......banana republic type stuff.

So, a problem has been identified and the first step to solving a problem is typically to identiify the nature of the problem. That typically involves an investigation. Here's a formal definition of the word in case you're still struggling with the concept:

Quote:carry out a systematic or formal inquiry to discover and examine the facts of (an incident, allegation, etc.) so as to establish the truth. carry out research or study into (a subject, typically one in a scientific or academic field) so as to discover facts or information. make inquiries as to the character, activities, or background of (someone)

Okay, that part's behind us, try to stay with me here.

Once the investigation is completed, and the problem or problems identified, dismantle the organization. Here's the definition of dismantle:

Quote:take (a machine or structure) to pieces

Now, no one is suggesting that the FBI be dismantled (see definition above) only to be left in pieces, in a non-functioning state. Quite the contrary, and this is where we've been going with this difficult concept all along. Everyone, in the end, I believe wants to see the FBI functioning even better.

So, once the investigation is completed, the problem or problems identified, dismantle the organization and rebuild or restructure it in such a way that no president, not even His Orangeness, can use the institution to torment his political enemies, ever again.

I'm sorry for using so many big words to make my case, but it was unaviodable. If you need any further help, I, or any number of other adults will be more than happy to walk you through these confusing concepts. We're here to help. We want to do it.......for the children.

Who are this people? What are their qualifications and what are their political backgrounds. So forgive me if I feel your argument is crap. You and these “many people have already come to a conclusion prior to any investigation. Let Huber do his job.

We're not prosecutors or investigators, so we're allowed to reach a conclusion long before all the facts are in. We're working with a body of evidence that so far has become public knowledge.......call it the court of public opinion.

Now if we were prosecutors or investigators, we couldn't be writing the guilty verdicts of those involved before all the evidence is in, until all the interviews are done, right?

That's the sort of thing only guys like Comey are allowed to do......writing an exoneration memo of Cankles months before she and 16 others were even interviewed.