(02-27-2018 10:01 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  Yet you think the exclusion of the G5 alone would render the P5 irrelevant when the P5 is totally dominant despite not including D2 and D3 and FCS for football bowls?

Have to agree with you quo. If UGA leaves for some hypothetical P5 league folks aren't gonna flock to Georgia Southern/State just because "they're NCAA".

I also agree with the notion that if NCAA wanted a "fair" tournament then, yes, all conferences should be represented, but NCAA doesn't have a need for a "fair" tournament or any "official" postseason at all in FBS. The bowls have been in place for much, much longer than even the most popular NCAA postseason tournament (March Madness started in 1938-39 season).

While I understand that SEC doesn't want to associate themselves with the Sun Belt in postseason or otherwise, if Troy or App got into the Top 25 I think they'd deserve at least a 12 seed in an expanded 12 team playoff (which is the same ratio the NIT has 32:351 compared to 12:130). I'd like CFP to expand to include representation from all conferences with members ranked in the top 25 as a compromise for representation AND competition.

Also, can y'all stop this stupid debate? You two clearly aren't going to resolve this between yourselves and this has nothing to do with marketing.