(03-06-2018 01:59 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  You pointed out nothing. You have zero idea what information committee uses rely on to formulate their opinions. You simply declared that you do, then made the leap that this means the results are 'circular'.

Nonsensical, so I called you on it.

Seriously Quo do you ever read anything or do you just snipe and ignore what is easily known?

But, of course, it's not that simple. There's discussion between each round. Large television monitors placed in front of committee members around the room display data from SportSource Analytics with everything from detailed offensive and defensive stats to various strength of schedule measurements. Teams can be viewed individually or in side-by-side comparisons.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kristidosh/...e-works/2/

First, the committee was briefed on the data platform that is used by the College Football Playoff, which allows the committee to compare 2-4 teams at a time by using many different metrics. As a college football computer pollster, strength of schedule always interests me, and the CFP has a variety of ways a voter can look at quality of schedule along with other metrics such as offensive, defensive and special team statistics.
https://www.theathletic.com/113415/2017/...selection/