Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
NCAA at-large bids
Author Message
Cajunman02 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,445
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 38
I Root For: Louisiana
Location:

CrappiesCrappies
Post: #1
 
This is something I ran across on the ESPN college basketball site. They give you a team's resume, but not a team's name. They ask you the simple question, If this team doesn't win their respective conference tourney, should they still be invited to the NCAA tourney? The results are amazing!

My answers 1) Y 2) N 3) Y 4) N 5) Y 6) N 7) Y 8) N 9) Y 10) Y 11) N 12) Y

<a href='http://proxy.espn.go.com/chat/sportsnation/polling?event_id=1184' target='_blank'>Go vote!</a>
02-16-2005 03:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


DrTorch Offline
Proved mach and GTS to be liars
*

Posts: 35,887
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 201
I Root For: ASU, BGSU
Location:

CrappiesDonatorsBalance of Power Contest
Post: #2
 
I love it!

My answers were:
1) Y
2) N
3) Y
4) Y
5) Y
6) N
7) Y
8) N
9) N
10) Y
11) N
12) Y
02-16-2005 04:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
blah Offline
Just doing the splits
*

Posts: 11,539
Joined: May 2004
Reputation: 164
I Root For: Stretching
Location: Just outside Uranus

CrappiesBlazerTalk AwardDonatorsSkunkworksSurvivor Runner-up
Post: #3
 
That was really cool....

I think my answers matched up pretty well even after I saw the names. The only 2 I differed on after seeing the names was Stanford, who I would have said no to on name alone and GT, who I would have said yes to on name alone. I think the GT one is deceiving though, as they have been without their floor leader, which I think should also be taken into consideration.
02-16-2005 05:11 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


georgia_tech_swagger Offline
Res publica non dominetur
*

Posts: 51,458
Joined: Feb 2002
Reputation: 2027
I Root For: GT, USCU, FU, WYO
Location: Upstate, SC

SkunkworksFolding@NCAAbbsNCAAbbs LUGCrappies
Post: #4
 
blah Wrote:That was really cool....

I think my answers matched up pretty well even after I saw the names. The only 2 I differed on after seeing the names was Stanford, who I would have said no to on name alone and GT, who I would have said yes to on name alone. I think the GT one is deceiving though, as they have been without their floor leader, which I think should also be taken into consideration.
They have been without their biggest perimeter player (BJ Elder) and biggest post player (Jeremis Smith). Yes, I consider Smith, even as a frosh, a much more important defensive player than Schenscher.
02-16-2005 06:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WazzuCoug82 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,430
Joined: Jul 2002
Reputation: 0
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #5
 
I am going to have to get into this competition..
02-22-2005 02:32 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.