Wake has the worst alltime winning percentage of all 117 div.IA football programs, and one final four from 40 years ago, it really has done nothing for the ACC and in fact taken money from the schools that earned it. College basketball changed completely in mid 80s with shot clock, 3 pointers, and 64 team NCAA field, before that there were final scores like 7-6 and huge underdogs like Villanova or NCSU having a chance in NCAA, but no more. NCSU benefitted tremendously from having first 13 ACC tourneys in Raleigh in Reynolds Coliseum, enrolling 400 SAT bball morons, and cheating with Valvano, but haven't done squat with 1 NCAA bid in over 10 years, plus it has second worst football history in NC. Clemson had to fire their titlewinning coach for cheating, and still has 15 NCAA violations every year and bad basketball.
Those 3 can't measure up to Syracuse with 15 straight winning seasons and counting in football plus national title and ESPN's best player ever Jim Brown, biggest basketball stadium in world, and best lacrosse national champs, and NY market, BC with all of New England to itself as well as good football and basketball, best hockey national champs, and great potential, Miami with 5 football national titles and baseball too, and Penn State which also has multiple football titles and biggest school and stadium in east and great overall sports and TV market.
Even if NCSU, Wake, and Clemson, were just as good or even better than Syracuse, Miami, BC, and PSU, and of course they're not, the new locations and TV markets would be far more profitable for UMD, UVA, Duke, UNC, GT, and FSU.
Wouldn't the Atlantic League be better in football, basketball, overall sports, rivalries, exposure, revenue, etc. compared to ACC, Big East, Big 10, as well as best in the nation instead of 2nd of 2 in southeast?
<small>[ July 17, 2002, 03:40 PM: Message edited by: BlueDevil ]</small>
|